Answer:

Introduction:

Lowering the minimum age criteria for entering Parliament in India has sparked debates about the benefits and drawbacks of encouraging more youth participation in politics. Given that 65% of India’s population is under 35 years, the proposal could address the representation gap and invigorate the political landscape. However, concerns about maturity and experience must also be addressed.

Body:

Potential Advantages

• Fresh Perspectives: Young politicians can bring new ideas and contemporary approaches to the legislative process. They are often more attuned to current issues such as technology, climate change, and social justice​​.
• Greater Representation: With a significant portion of the population being under 35, lowering the age limit could provide a more proportional representation of youth interests in Parliament​.
• Global Trends: Several democracies have embraced younger candidates. For instance, the UK lowered its age limit to 18 in 2006. Similarly, France and other countries have reduced their age requirements, aligning with changing attitudes toward youth participation​​.
• Innovation and Adaptability: Young politicians can introduce innovative solutions to complex issues, drawing on their unique experiences and skills. Their inclusion can lead to a more dynamic and responsive political system​​.

Potential Disadvantages

• Lack of Experience: Critics argue that younger candidates may not possess the life experience or maturity to make informed decisions on complex political issues. The Election Commission has cited these reasons for opposing a reduction in the minimum age for candidacy​.
• Entrenched Norms: Traditional views on leadership often associate political competence with age, leading to resistance against younger candidates. This scepticism can make it difficult for young people to gain traction in the political arena​​.
• Balancing Expertise and Vigor: While youthful energy can drive change, it’s essential to balance this with the experience and wisdom required for effective governance​​.

Conclusion:

Lowering the minimum age criteria for entering Parliament has both potential benefits and risks. By embracing the energy and creativity of youth, India can achieve greater representation and introduce innovative ideas into its political landscape. However, striking a balance between youthful vigor and the experience required for governance remains crucial. Further dialogue and comprehensive evaluations are needed to determine the best approach​.