Answer:

Introduction:

Secularism promotes the separation of religion from the state. In the Indian context, secularism means equal respect for all religions, with the state actively intervening to ensure religious harmony. For example, India celebrates diverse religious festivals officially. In contrast, Western secularism, such as in France, involves a strict separation between religion and state, ensuring that the state remains neutral towards all religions, exemplified by France’s prohibition of religious symbols in public institutions.

Body:

Difference between the Indian  and the Western Concept of Secularism 

• Definition and Philosophy:
  • Indian Secularism: Emphasizes equal respect and support for all religions. The state actively supports various religious practices.
    For example: India’s funding of pilgrimages like the Haj subsidy (discontinued in 2018) and the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra.
  • Western Secularism: Advocates for strict separation between religion and state, ensuring state neutrality.
    For example: The US First Amendment, which prohibits the establishment of religion by the government.
• Historical Context:
  • Indian Context: Emerged from the need to manage a pluralistic society with diverse religious communities, influenced by historical practices of religious tolerance.
    For example: Emperor Ashoka’s edicts promoting religious harmony and coexistence.
  • Western Context: Rooted in the Enlightenment, reacting against religious dominance over state affairs.
    For example: The French Revolution, which established secularism as a response to the Church’s influence on the state.
• Role of the State:
  • Indian Model: The state can intervene in religious matters to ensure equality and prevent discrimination.
    For example: The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, which reformed Hindu personal laws.
  • Western Model: The state generally refrains from intervening in religious affairs, maintaining a clear boundary.
    For example:  The US Supreme Court rulings on the separation of church and state in public schools.
• Legal Framework:
  • Indian Constitution: Articles 25-28 guarantee freedom of religion while allowing state intervention in secular aspects of religious practices.
    For example:  The regulation of temple finances by the state.
  • Western Constitutions: Prohibits the establishment of religion and protects the free exercise of religion.
    For example:  The French Law of 1905 on the Separation of the Churches and State, which emphasizes state neutrality.
• Social Integration:
  • Indian Secularism: Aims for social integration by accommodating religious diversity within the public sphere.
    For example:  Public holidays for various religious festivals like Diwali, Eid, and Christmas.
  • Western Secularism: Seeks social cohesion by minimizing religious identity in the public domain.
    For example:  France’s ban on wearing religious symbols in public schools (2004 law).
• Implementation and Challenges:
  • Indian Scenario: Faces challenges like communalism and politicization of religion.
    For example:  The communal riots in Gujarat in 2002 highlighted the vulnerabilities in India’s secular fabric.
  • Western Scenario: Deals with issues like secular intolerance and debates over religious freedoms.
    For example:  The controversy over the burkini ban in France reflects ongoing tensions between secularism and religious expression.

Conclusion:

Indian secularism uniquely manages religious diversity by promoting equal respect and occasional state intervention, contrasting with Western secularism’s strict separation of religion and state. Future efforts in India should focus on fostering inclusive policies and addressing communal tensions to strengthen its secular fabric and ensure harmonious coexistence.