Supreme Court’s Verdict on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004

6 Nov 2024

Supreme Court’s Verdict on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004

A three bench Chief Justice of India upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004 with exceptions regarding higher education provisions.

Key Highlights of the Judgement

  • Validation with Limitations : The Act was upheld for primary and secondary madrasa education but declared unconstitutional for higher education provisions at Fazil (undergraduate) and Kamil (postgraduate) levels.
  • Conflict with UGC Act: These levels intrude on Entry 66 of the Union List, which exclusively grants the Central Government control over higher education standards.
  • UP Madarsa Act, 2004 : It was introduced to regulate madarsa education in UP, covering subjects like Islamic studies, Tibb, and Urdu.
    • It established the UP Board of Madarsa Education, which oversees curricula, exams, and degrees Kamil and Fazil.
  • Allahabad High Court Ruling: It Quashed the UP Madarsa Act, citing violations of Articles 14, 15, and 21-A, and a lack of secular education.
    • The High court ordered the integration of madarsa students into regular UP schools.
  • Response to Allahabad High Court’s Secularism Argument: The Court clarified that constitutional validity cannot be challenged solely on grounds of Basic Structure violations.
    • For a law to be invalidated, it must clearly violate constitutional provisions related to secularism.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

State’s Right to Regulate Education

  • The State can regulate madrasa education to ensure competency standards for students, allowing them to participate in society effectively.
  • The Act allows the Madrasa Board to set curricula, teacher qualifications, and infrastructure standards without interfering in daily administration.

Minority Rights under Article 30

  • Article 30 provides minorities with the right to establish and manage educational institutions, but this right is not absolute.
  • The State can impose regulations to ensure educational standards while balancing minority rights.

Interpretation of Education under Entry 25

  • The term “education” in Entry 25 of the Concurrent List has a broad meaning, covering institutions that offer both secular and religious education.
  • Recognised madrasas primarily aim to educate, and thus fall under Entry 25’s scope.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Secular Standards as per different Constitutional Provisions

  • Article 21A (right to education) aligns with minority rights to administer educational institutions.
  • Secular Standards: The Madrasa Board can set secular education standards without affecting the institution’s minority status.
  • Religious Instruction (Article 28(3)): Article 28(3) protects students in minority institutions from being forced into religious instruction or worship if the institution is state-recognised or publicly funded.

Archive Calendar

Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

by month

SRIJAN MAINS

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.