Despite ongoing reforms, the Banking, Financial services, and Insurance (BFSI) sector in India grapples with deep-rooted inefficiencies and trust deficits.

• There is a need for deeper structural corrections, particularly in corporate bond markets, retirement planning instruments, nomination processes across BFSI, and the growing menace of shadow banking.

Key Issues In BFSI Sector

• Nomination Confusion: Across BFSI verticals (banks, mutual funds, insurance), the rules governing nominees are inconsistent.
  • There is no harmonised nomination framework, with clarity on nominee rights versus legal heir claims.
• Corporate Bond Market Crisis: 
  • Shallow, Low Volume and Illiquid: Limited participation restricts market depth and efficient price discovery.
  • Opaque Trading: Lack of transparency deters investors and reduces confidence.
  • Neglected Secondary Market: RBI’s directive to develop the secondary bond market was ignored by the National Stock Exchange (NSE), as equity trading gives higher margins over bonds.
  • High Cost of Capital: Inefficiency in the bond market keeps borrowing costs 2–3% higher, hurting industry and jobs.
• Ownership Transparency and FATF: 
  • UBO Gaps: India, as an FATF member, is committed to transparency in capital flows, including identification of Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) but enforcement lags behind.
    • Ultimate Beneficial Owners (UBOs) refer to the natural persons who ultimately own or control a legal entity (usually 25% or more), even if the ownership is held indirectly through layers of intermediaries.
  • Opaque Foreign Investments: SEBI struggles to extract shareholder data from foreign investors (e.g., Elara, Vespera), hampering oversight and delaying regulatory action.
  • Loopholes in Disclosure Thresholds: India’s current UBO disclosure thresholds (10% for companies and 15% for partnerships as against 25% requirement of FATF) create loopholes that allow entities to structure investments just below these limits, thereby avoiding identification.
• Retirement Planning Problems: 
  • Domination Of Annuities: Most Indian retirement plans rely on annuities, which carry high intermediation fees (often ~2%) from insurance companies.
    • Even young professionals in the BFSI sector lack access to efficient retirement tools.
  • Zero-Coupon Government Bonds: The better alternative for annuities are Zero Coupon Government Bonds. These long-dated, stripped securities offer low-cost, predictable returns and are ideal for retirement goals.
    • Avoiding a 2% fee over 30 years results in substantial savings gains.
  • Government has not launched large scale retirement products.
• Shadow Banking Risks:  
  • Regulatory Blind Spot: Non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), margin lenders, repo traders, and brokers are offering bank-like services without being subject to full regulatory oversight.
  • High-Risk Lending Practices: Brokers extend margin funding at effective interest rates exceeding 20%, often without investor awareness.
  • Opaque Collateral Use: The broker holds the investor’s contribution as collateral, lends it back to them, and charges interest on the full amount — a classic shadow banking trick.

Suggested Measures

• Harmonised Nomination Framework: Create a harmonised nomination framework across banks, mutual funds, and insurance sectors with clarity on nominee rights versus legal heir claims to avoid legal ambiguities and protracted litigation.
• Structural Reform: Implement deeper structural reforms to develop the corporate bond market as a means to reduce the cost of capital and unlock industrial growth.
• Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) Disclosure: Lower disclosure thresholds and mandate granular shareholder data to plug loopholes and ensure compliance with FATF’s UBO 2022 guidelines on ownership transparency.
• Sovereign Instruments: Promote long-dated zero-coupon government securities as a retirement planning option, avoiding high intermediation margins of annuity-based products.
• Regulation of Shadow Banking: Launch a comprehensive data-gathering initiative to map activities of NBFCs, margin lenders, and brokers offering bank-like services without full oversight.
• Adopt Best Practices: India must follow the European Union’s approach by legislating for gathering comprehensive data on shadow banking activities.

Conclusion

India needs structural financial reforms to ensure transparency, investor trust, and long-term growth.