Prime Minister Modi recently launched the ₹44,605 crore Ken-Betwa river interlinking project to transfer water between the Ken and Betwa basins. However, it faces legal, environmental challenges, and its long-term viability is uncertain.
Objectives and Costs
- At a budgeted cost of ₹44,605 crore, the Ken-Betwa river (both tributaries of the Yamuna) interlinking project is one of the flagship initiatives under India’s National Perspective Plan for water management.
- The project seeks to transfer water from the relatively “water-surplus” Ken river basin to the “water-deficient” Betwa basin.
- Two Phases: The Ken-Betwa Link Project consists of two phases.
- Phase-I includes the construction of the Daudhan Dam complex, along with the Low Level Tunnel, High Level Tunnel, Ken-Betwa Link Canal, and powerhouses.
- Phase-II involves three components: the Lower Orr Dam, Bina Complex Project, and Kotha Barrage.
- The water will be used for irrigation, drinking water, and other purposes in the region, including the Bundelkhand area, which has long struggled with water scarcity.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
Legal and Environmental Concerns
- National Green Tribunal’s Pending Deliberations: The project’s approval by the Union Cabinet in 2021 came despite ongoing deliberations by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which was considering a legal challenge to the project’s environmental clearance.
- Bypassing Environmental Scrutiny: The proposed Daudhan Dam will be constructed inside the Panna Tiger Reserve, a critically sensitive ecological area. Experts have warned that this will result in the destruction of thousands of trees and the destabilization of fragile ecosystems.
- The government has ignored critical inputs from experts, including those from a Supreme Court-appointed empowered committee, and bypassed due process.
- Lack of Hydrological Data Transparency: The government has refused to release hydrological data on the Ken and Betwa river basins, citing sensitivity due to their location within the international Ganga basin.
- Same Drought Time: Various studies have highlighted that the Ken and the Betwa basins suffer floods and droughts together.
- The Betwa basin’s water deficiency is primarily due to extensive irrigation, and experts warn that diverting more water from the Ken basin could exacerbate the problem for both regions.
- Need for Water Storage: By maintaining environmental flow and focusing on natural storage can improve the situation in Betwa basin.
- Political Motives: Critics argue that the project is politically motivated, aimed at pacifying voters in the Bundelkhand region by promising immediate water relief.
Pros and Cons of River Linking Projects
| Pros |
Cons |
| Water Security: Improves water availability in water-scarce regions. |
Environmental Impact: Can disrupt ecosystems, alter river flows, and impact biodiversity. |
| Irrigation: Increases agricultural productivity in water-deficient areas. |
Social Displacement: Can lead to displacement of communities and loss of livelihoods. |
| Hydropower Generation: Potential to generate significant hydropower. |
Geological Instability: Can trigger earthquakes and other geological hazards. |
| Navigation: Can improve navigation and transportation. |
High Cost: Construction and maintenance costs can be substantial. |
Check Out UPSC Modules From PW Store
Conclusion
Like other large-scale projects, the burden of addressing the negative consequences of the Ken-Betwa project and others, like the Parbati-Kalisindh-Chambal link, is likely to fall on the public. This could manifest as ecological damage, resource mismanagement, or financial costs. The public may bear the long-term risks of projects that may not fulfill their promises.
27 Dec 2024
