Recently, a robot working for the Gumi City Council in South Korea was recently found unresponsive at the bottom of a two-meter staircase. Locals are labelling it country’s first robot “suicide”.
Relevancy for Mains: Robot Suicide- Ethics, AI machines and Rights, etc. |
- High Usage of Robots in South Korea: The International Federation of Robotics says that South Korea has one of the highest robot densities in the world, with one industrial robot for every ten human employees.
- Earlier Such Case: This is not the first time a robot has met an untimely end. In 2017, a security robot named Steve working in Washington, DC reportedly “died by suicide” by drowning in a fountain.
- However, on further investigation, it was found out that the robot had dived in the water body after skidding on a loose brick surface.
- Implications of this Robot Suicide: The robot’s sudden demise has stirred up a mix of emotions and opinions in local media and online forums.
- This incident raises questions about the robot’s workload and broader implications of robot integration.
- It may never fully understand the mechanical mind, one thing is certain – this incident has sparked an important conversation about the future of robots in our society.
- On Granting Rights:
- Eligible for Rights: Some experts believe “a robot should have consciousness, intentionality, rationality, personhood, autonomy, and sentience to be eligible for rights”.
- Eligible for Rites: Granting rights is not the only way to address the moral status of robots. Envisioning robots as rites bearers and not rights bearers could work better.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
Conclusion
- This debate is unlikely to die in a hurry, as AI-powered robots become more intelligent, and increasingly do more human-like tasks, there will be more clamor for them to be treated the same as humans. It’s our “emotional connect” that will dictate a lot of this reasoning.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.