The recent hooch tragedy in Bihar’s Siwan and Saran districts, which claimed 35 lives, has reignited a significant debate about the nature of behaviour change.

• Is it primarily a legal issue or an ethical one? 
  • This incident not only raises questions about the effectiveness of existing laws but also prompts a critical examination of the ethical implications surrounding personal freedoms and state intervention.
• Another central question arises is whether  the states should  impose restrictions on individual freedoms in the name of welfare?
  • Advocates for legal reform argue that strict laws are necessary to curb the illegal liquor trade and protect public health. 
  • On the other hand, ethical considerations suggest that any restrictions must carefully balance individual rights with the common good.

Ethical and Constitutional Basis 

• Moral Duties
  • The social contract theory posits that the government has a moral duty to protect the welfare of its citizens. 
  • In a male-dominated society like India, the negative consequences of alcohol consumption often affect vulnerable groups, especially women and children.
  • Thus, banning alcohol can be seen as a means to secure justice for these vulnerable populations.   
• Utilitarian Philosophy
  • The utilitarian approach suggests that prohibiting alcohol can achieve the greatest good for the greatest number. 
  • One intoxicated individual can negatively impact an entire family.
• Obligation Under the Constitution: 
  • Article 47 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the state outlaw the use of narcotics and alcoholic beverages. 
  • It states that the government must improve living conditions and nutrition to promote public health.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Factors Influencing the Success of a Law

• Stakeholder Engagement: Effective laws typically emerge from extensive consultations involving diverse stakeholders. 
  • For example, the prohibition of sati was enacted after persistent community advocacy, whereas hastily passed laws, such as certain anti-alcohol regulations, often fail to meet their objectives due to a lack of stakeholder engagement.
• Justification of Legislation: For example, Anti-slavery laws gained momentum through strong moral arguments against the practice, leading to its abolition. 
• Legal Feasibility: For instance, lockdown rules may be adopted more readily than complex anti-corruption measures, which often face legal hurdles and constraints.
• Implementation Strategy: Successful implementation relies on a clear strategy encompassing six critical requirements:
  • Consistency and Clarity in Goals: The law’s objectives must be clearly defined and communicated.
  • Validity of Motivation: The rationale behind the law should be sound and broadly accepted.
  • Structured Implementation Process: A systematic approach is essential for executing the law effectively.
  • Officials’ Commitment: Strong dedication from enforcement officials is crucial for the law’s success.
  • Support from Civil Society: Public backing is necessary for successful enforcement.
  • Persistence of Socioeconomic Conditions: The law must align with the prevailing socioeconomic context to be effective.

By addressing these factors, lawmakers can enhance the likelihood of successful legal reforms and their intended impact on society.