Answer

India aspires to be a global science and innovation hub. However, growing dependence on contractual researchers in premier R&D institutions like CSIR, DRDO, and ICAR reflects deeper structural flaws in talent retention, funding, and institutional planning. This over-reliance threatens both research continuity and scientific morale.

Reasons behind growing Dependence on contractual scientific staff in India

• Inadequate Public Investment in R&D: India’s low spending on research limits the creation of permanent scientific positions.
  For example: India spends only 0.64% of GDP on R&D, compared to 2.4% in China and 3.2% in South Korea.
• Project-Based Funding Structure: Many scientific roles are tied to short-duration, externally funded projects rather than institutional budgets.
• Rigid and Delayed Recruitment Processes: Lengthy hiring procedures for permanent posts force institutions to depend on temporary staff.
  For example: Faculty hiring at IITs and IISc may take over a year, prompting reliance on contractual researchers. 
• Lack of a National Tenure-Track System: The absence of structured career progression discourages long-term scientific engagement.
• Policy Focus on Output, Not Integration: Government schemes boost research numbers but don’t ensure secure post-award employment.
  

Implications of Growing Dependence on Contractual Staff

• Job Insecurity and Brain Drain: Short-term contracts discourage long-term commitment, pushing top talent abroad.
  For example: India has just 4 researchers per 10,000 workforce compared to 18 in China and 14 in Brazil. 
• Decline in Research Quality and Continuity: Frequent turnover affects long-term research, especially in frontier areas like space, AI, and climate tech.
  For example: DRDO faced delays in defence tech projects due to exits of project-based scientists. 
• Limited Access to Institutional Resources: Contractual staff are often excluded from grants, training, and mentorship opportunities.
  For example: CSIR project researchers lack access to publication funds or international conferences. 
• Administrative and Financial Delays: Delay in fellowship/stipend disbursement and lack of grievance redressal affect productivity.
• Loss of Institutional Memory: Lack of retention leads to erosion of domain-specific experience and weakens research culture.
  For example: In ICAR’s crop research stations, absence of continuity disrupted hybrid seed development efforts.

Sustainable Reforms to Strengthen the Scientific Workforce

• Introduce Tenure-Track Career Systems:  Create performance-linked transitions from contractual to permanent roles.
  For example: DAE introduced tenure-track programs in select labs post-2021 to retain talent.
• Increase R&D Expenditure: Scale up public investment in R&D to match global benchmarks.
• Encourage Industry-Academia Linkages:  Enable contractual researchers to work on applied projects with corporate partnerships.
  For example: IIT Madras Research Park links over 50 startups with academic researchers. 
• Expand Mentorship and Professional Development: Institutionalize training, proposal-writing workshops, and publication guidance for early-career researchers.
  For example: PM Research Fellowship provides guided mentorship by senior scientists. 
• Ensure Transparent Hiring and Evaluation Processes:
  Standardize hiring, promotion, and grant allocation through digital peer-reviewed platforms.
  For example: SERB’s online evaluation system has improved transparency in fellowships. 

India’s scientific potential cannot be unlocked through fragmented and insecure employment. A comprehensive workforce policy combining security, support, and opportunity is essential to fuel innovation, retain global talent, and position India as a leader in science and technology.