Answer:
Approach:
Introduction
- Briefly mention the EVM controversy and its implications on the trustworthiness of elections in India.
Body
- Discuss the challenges before the Election Commission of India in four categories:
- technical,
- transparency and auditability,
- perception and awareness, and
- legal challenges. Also, provide examples for each category.
Conclusion
- Summarize the importance of addressing these challenges to ensure the integrity of the electoral process and uphold the democratic values of India.
|
Introduction:
In recent years, the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in India’s electoral process has sparked debates and controversies, raising concerns about the trustworthiness and credibility of election outcomes. As the guardian of the electoral process, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has the responsibility to address these concerns and ensure that the democratic exercise of voting remains fair, transparent, and reliable.
Body:
These challenges can be broadly classified into the following categories:
- Technical Challenges:
- Security: Ensuring that EVMs are tamper-proof and resistant to hacking attempts is crucial. Example: In 2017, the ECI organized a hackathon, inviting experts to try and manipulate the EVMs, demonstrating the robustness of the machines.
- Malfunctioning: Instances of EVMs malfunctioning during elections have been reported, leading to doubts about their reliability. Example: During the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, there were reports of EVMs malfunctioning in some constituencies, which led to re-polling in specific booths.
- Transparency and Auditability:
- VVPAT: Voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) machines provide an additional layer of transparency by allowing voters to verify their vote on a printed paper slip. Example: In the 2019 general elections, VVPATs were used across all polling stations in India, but there are still concerns about the proper functioning and storage of VVPAT slips.
- Regular audits: Conducting regular audits of EVMs and VVPATs to ensure the integrity of the electoral process. Example: In the 2019 general elections, ECI increased the VVPAT slip counting rate from one to five randomly selected EVMs per assembly segment.
- Perception and Awareness:
- Public trust: Building public trust in the EVMs and the electoral process is essential to maintain the credibility of elections. Example: ECI has organized workshops and seminars to educate the public and political parties about EVMs and their security features.
- Misinformation: Tackling misinformation and fake news about EVMs is necessary to prevent the spread of mistrust. Example: ECI has set up a social media monitoring cell to track and counter fake news and misinformation about EVMs.
- Legal Challenges:
- Judicial scrutiny: Addressing legal challenges filed in courts regarding the use of EVMs and ensuring that judgements are implemented. Example: In response to a PIL filed in the Supreme Court in 2018, the ECI agreed to increase VVPAT slip counting in elections.
Conclusion:
To ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India, the Election Commission must work on addressing these challenges through technical improvements, increased transparency, raising awareness, and proactively tackling legal issues. Strengthening the electoral process and ensuring its integrity is vital to uphold the democratic values enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Latest Comments