Answer:

Introduction:

The case study presents a scenario where a manager of Company A, during a critical deal negotiation with the manager of Company B, becomes an eyewitness to a road accident caused by the manager of Company B.

The manager faces dilemmas regarding whether to provide an honest account of the incident, which could jeopardize the deal and potentially lead to legal consequences for the manager of Company B.

Body:

In the given scenario, the manager faces several dilemmas with significant consequences. Here is a more detailed view of the dilemmas faced and potential responses:

Dilemmas Faced:

1.  Ethical Dilemma: The manager is torn between the ethical obligation to tell the truth about the accident and the potential negative impact on their company’s critical deal. They must weigh the value of honesty and justice against the potential harm to their company and its employees.
2.  Legal Dilemma: The manager is aware of the strict laws governing road accidents and the legal obligation to provide an honest account of the incident. However, doing so could lead to the prosecution of the manager of company B and potentially jeopardize the deal.
3.  Professional Dilemma: The manager faces a conflict between their professional duty to act in the best interests of their company and the moral obligation to uphold truth and justice. They must consider the long-term consequences for their own reputation and credibility.

Potential Responses:

1.  Prioritize Truth and Justice: The manager can choose to prioritize truth and justice by providing an honest and accurate account of the incident to the law enforcement officer. This decision reflects a commitment to ethical conduct and upholding the law, even if it may jeopardize the deal and have serious consequences for the manager of company B.
2.  Mitigate the Consequences: The manager can provide a factual account of the accident that minimizes the manager of company B’s culpability without completely absolving them. By striking a balance between truth and protecting their company’s interests, the manager may hope to mitigate the consequences for both parties involved.
3.  Seek Legal Advice: The manager can consult with legal experts to understand the potential legal ramifications and explore alternative solutions. This approach involves seeking guidance on how to navigate the situation while adhering to legal obligations and protecting their company’s interests.
4.  Negotiate a Settlement: The manager can consider negotiating a settlement with the injured motorcyclist, compensating them for the injuries and damages caused. This approach aims to address the immediate consequences of the accident while potentially mitigating the need for legal prosecution.
5.  Maintain Open Communication: The manager can maintain open communication with the manager of company B, discussing the situation and exploring mutually agreeable solutions. This approach involves transparently discussing the incident’s consequences and working towards a resolution that considers the interests of both parties.

Conclusion:

Ultimately, the manager must carefully evaluate the potential risks, legal obligations, and moral considerations in order to make an informed decision. Balancing the principles of truth, justice, and the interests of their company will require careful thought and consideration of the potential long-term consequences.