Answer:

 Introduction:

The case study highlights the trend of politicization of bureaucracy, where political considerations dominate over merit-based appointments and decision-making. This leads to consequences such as a decline in meritocracy, erosion of neutrality, loss of expertise, administrative inefficiency, weakened institutional autonomy, and public distrust.

Body:

The consequences of the ‘politicization of bureaucracy’ are as follows:

• Lack of Meritocracy: When political considerations dominate over merit-based appointments and promotions, the selection of bureaucrats is influenced by political affiliations rather than their competence and expertise. This leads to a decline in the quality of governance and hampers the efficient functioning of the bureaucracy.
• Erosion of Neutrality: Bureaucrats are expected to be neutral and impartial in their decision-making. However, when bureaucracy becomes politicized, bureaucrats may align themselves with the political executive and act in favor of political interests rather than serving the public interest. This compromises the neutrality and integrity of the bureaucracy.
• Loss of Expertise: The politicization of bureaucracy can discourage competent and experienced professionals from joining or remaining in the civil services. When bureaucratic positions are subject to political interference, individuals with the necessary expertise and knowledge may be overlooked in favor of politically connected individuals. This results in a loss of specialized knowledge and skills within the bureaucracy.
• Decline in Administrative Efficiency: When bureaucratic decisions are influenced by political considerations, the administrative process becomes slower and less efficient. Bureaucrats may face pressure to prioritize political interests over effective governance, leading to delays, inefficiencies, and compromised decision-making.
• Weakening of Institutional Autonomy: The politicization of bureaucracy undermines the autonomy of bureaucratic institutions. When bureaucrats are subjected to political pressures, their ability to act independently and provide objective advice and analysis is compromised. This weakens the checks and balances in the system and reduces the accountability of the bureaucracy.
• Public Distrust: When the bureaucracy is perceived as being politicized, it erodes public trust in the government and undermines the credibility of the administrative system. Citizens may view bureaucratic decisions as influenced by political motives rather than being based on merit and public welfare. This can lead to disillusionment and a lack of faith in the functioning of the government.

 Conclusion:

Overall, the politicization of bureaucracy has far-reaching consequences for governance, including a decline in meritocracy, erosion of neutrality, loss of expertise, administrative inefficiency, weakened institutional autonomy, and public distrust.

It is important to maintain the independence and professionalism of the bureaucracy to ensure effective and accountable governance.