Answer:
| Approach:
Introduction
- Introduce with a brief explanation of the terms ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes,’ highlighting their use in response to cross-border terrorist threats.
Body
- Discuss how these operations serve to deter hostile entities and state sponsors of terrorism by signaling a strong stance against terrorist activities.
- Highlight how these actions aim to damage terrorist infrastructure, thereby disrupting their operational capabilities.
- Explain how successful operations can bolster the morale of security forces and foster domestic support.
- Discuss the potential diplomatic implications of such actions, both positive and negative.
Conclusion
- Conclude by emphasizing that while these military responses can be effective, they need to be part of a broader strategy that balances military action with diplomatic initiatives and internal security measures for long-term peace and stability.
|
Introduction:
‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ are military strategies often employed in the face of cross-border terrorist threats. While ‘Hot Pursuit’ involves chasing a retreating enemy into its territory, ‘Surgical Strikes’ are precise, targeted operations intended to inflict damage with minimal collateral damage and escalation.
Body:
Strategic Impact of Hot Pursuit and Surgical Strikes:
- Deterrence:
- These actions send a strong message to adversarial entities and state sponsors of terrorism, deterring them from engaging in hostile activities.
- For instance, India’s surgical strike post the Uri attack in 2016 signaled its intolerance towards cross-border terrorism.
- Disruption of Terror Infrastructure:
- Such actions aim at damaging the terrorist infrastructure, thereby impeding their operational capabilities.
- Boost Morale:
- Demonstrating the ability to retaliate boosts the morale of security forces and bolsters domestic support.
- International Diplomacy:
- These actions can compel international attention towards the issue of terrorism, facilitating diplomatic pressure on countries harbouring terrorists.
- However, it might also escalate tension and potentially trigger an international dispute.
Conclusion:
While ‘Hot Pursuit’ and ‘Surgical Strikes’ can be effective military responses to terrorist threats, they must be part of a larger, comprehensive strategy. Balancing these actions with diplomatic initiatives and internal security measures is essential for long-term peace and stability.
GS Foundation
Crash Course
Combo
Optional Courses
Degree Program
