Answer

The Industrial Revolution in England, which began in the late 18th century, revolutionized global trade and manufacturing. While it spurred unprecedented economic growth in Britain, it led to the decline of handicrafts and cottage industries in India. Machine-made British goods flooded Indian markets, displacing traditional industries that had once thrived. Combined with exploitative British trade policies, these changes resulted in widespread deindustrialization and economic hardship for Indian artisans.

The Industrial Revolution in England Was Responsible for the Decline of Handicrafts and Cottage Industries in India:

• Introduction of Machine-Made Goods: The advent of machine-made textiles in England drastically reduced the cost of production, leading to the replacement of Indian handmade goods.
  For example: By the 1830s, British cotton textiles flooded Indian markets, causing the collapse of India’s cotton weaving industry.
• Decline in Export of Indian Textiles: Indian textile exports, once highly sought after in Europe, plummeted due to competition from British machine-made textiles.
  For example: The collapse of the Bengal Muslin industry, known for its fine fabric, symbolized the decline of Indian exports.
• Imposition of Heavy Tariffs on Indian Goods: British policies imposed high tariffs on Indian textiles, making it impossible for Indian goods to compete in the global market.
  For example: Indian cotton textiles faced tariffs as high as 70-80%, limiting their export potential while British goods faced no such restrictions.
• Shift to Raw Material Export: India was transformed into a supplier of raw materials, primarily cotton, for British factories, undermining local industries.
  For example: During the mid-19th century, Indian raw cotton exports increased by over 300%, while local weavers struggled due to rising raw material prices.
• Technological Disparity: Indian cottage industries, reliant on handlooms, couldn’t compete with the advanced machinery used in British factories.
  For example: While British power looms produced textiles rapidly, Indian handlooms remained labor-intensive, making local products uncompetitive.
• British Colonial Policies: The British East India Company‘s monopolistic policies and heavy taxation further crippled India’s handicraft sectors.
  For example: The East India Company levied high taxes on artisans, particularly in Bengal, making it difficult for them to sustain their businesses.

Other Factors Responsible for the Decline of Handicrafts and Cottage Industries in India:

• Colonial Revenue Systems: The British-imposed land revenue systems forced many artisans to abandon their crafts due to high taxes.
  For example: The Permanent Settlement in Bengal imposed high land taxes, pushing weavers to abandon their trade and engage in agriculture.
• Railways and Transportation: The expansion of railways made it easier for British goods to penetrate rural markets, displacing local handicrafts.
  For example: By 1853, British goods reached even the most remote villages, leading to a decline in demand for local crafts.
• Famine and Economic Strain: Frequent famines during British rule weakened local industries by impoverishing artisan communities.
  For example: The Great Famine of 1876-78 in Madras and Bombay led to widespread displacement of weavers and artisans, further crippling the industry.
• Decline of Patronage Systems: The collapse of traditional patronage from local kings and zamindars led to a decrease in demand for luxury handicrafts.
  For example: The decline of Mughal patronage resulted in reduced demand for fine embroidery and luxury textiles.
• Shift in Consumer Preferences: As British-made goods became cheaper and widely available, Indian consumers shifted their preferences, reducing demand for locally made products.
  For example: British-made clothing became increasingly popular, reducing demand for traditional Indian textiles like Chanderi and Banarasi silk.
• Absence of Industrial Protection Policies: Unlike European countries like Germany and the US, India had no protectionist policies to safeguard its domestic industries.
  For instance: India lacked protectionist tariffs that could have shielded local industries from foreign competition.

The Industrial Revolution in England was a primary factor in the decline of India’s handicrafts and cottage industries, but it was compounded by colonial policies, famines, and economic exploitation. As British industries thrived, India’s artisan communities collapsed, transforming the subcontinent into a supplier of raw materials for British factories. This led to severe socio-economic consequences, eroding India’s traditional industrial base and impoverishing millions.

DOWNLOAD PDF