Answer

The bystander effect refers to the phenomenon where individuals are less likely to intervene in an emergency, assuming others will take action. In public administration, this can affect officials’ responsiveness during crises, leading to delays or inadequate responses. To counter this, fostering a culture of accountability, training, and leadership can encourage proactive behavior and ensure timely interventions in emergencies.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Impact of the Bystander Effect on Responsiveness of Officials During Emergencies

• Diffusion of Responsibility: When multiple officials are involved, each person may believe others will act, leading to delays and insufficient response during an emergency.
  For example: During the 1984 Bhopal gas leak disaster, numerous agencies delayed their actions, assuming others would handle the crisis, worsening the impact on residents.
• Fear of Judgment: Officials may hesitate to act due to the fear of being criticized if their actions are seen as wrong, especially in high-pressure situations.
  For example: In a fire emergency, local authorities delayed evacuation, worried that overreacting would lead to reputational damage, resulting in unnecessary injuries and fatalities.
• Lack of Accountability: Shared responsibility in a group setting can lead to a lack of individual accountability, causing inaction during emergencies when decisions need to be made promptly.
  For example: During the 2018 Kerala floods, no single agency took charge, and relief efforts were slow, exacerbating the suffering of affected communities.
• Over-reliance on Protocols: Officials may wait for predefined procedures to be followed or approval before taking action, leading to inaction in urgent situations requiring immediate decisions.
• Psychological Paralysis: Seeing other officials remain passive in an emergency can lead to psychological paralysis, where individuals hesitate to act, fearing they might make a mistake.
  For example: During a stampede in a crowded event, officials failed to control the crowd quickly, as they were uncertain whether others would step in or take charge.

Measures to Cultivate Proactive Behaviour

• Training in Crisis Management: Regular and thorough training in emergency scenarios can equip officials with the confidence to act quickly and effectively, minimizing hesitation in critical moments.
  For example: Japan’s regular earthquake preparedness drills have significantly improved the responsiveness of their emergency responders, enabling them to act quickly and save lives during disasters.
• Clear Accountability Mechanisms: Designating clear roles and responsibilities for officials ensures that individuals understand their duties, reducing the diffusion of responsibility and improving the speed of response.
  For example: In the United States, the Incident Command System (ICS) clearly assigns leadership during emergencies, ensuring that there is no confusion about who is in charge, speeding up responses.
• Incentivizing Initiative: Providing rewards or recognition for proactive behavior can motivate officials to take initiative and act decisively, even in uncertain or high-risk situations.
  For example: After the 2019 Odisha cyclone, officials who led timely evacuation efforts were recognized with national awards, encouraging others to adopt a proactive approach in future emergencies.
• Psychological Conditioning: Behavioral training programs can help officials overcome fears and the hesitation associated with judgment, promoting a mindset of confidence and quick decision-making during emergencies.
  For example: Mumbai police officers undergo training simulations that prepare them to make rapid decisions in terror attacks, helping to reduce hesitation when confronted with real threats.
• Real-time Communication Systems: Implementing efficient and real-time communication platforms allows officials to stay connected, coordinate efforts, and ensure timely actions, reducing delays and confusion in emergency situations.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

To combat the bystander effect in public administration, officials should be trained to take swift, independent actions during emergencies. Establishing clear accountability, fostering a culture of responsibility, and incentivizing proactive behavior can ensure timely responses. Leveraging technology for real-time monitoring and communication can further enhance officials’ quick decision-making capabilities.

DOWNLOAD PDF