Answer

The government recently allocated ₹28,000 crore to the Department of Science and Technology in the budget, marking a threefold increase from the previous year. However, India’s overall expenditure on R&D remains relatively low at around 0.65% of GDP, significantly trailing behind countries like South Korea (4.8%) and China (2.4%). While budgetary allocations for R&D have risen, translating these investments into meaningful research outcomes continues to be a challenge.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Research Output Remains Suboptimal Despite Substantial Budgetary Allocations

• Low Private Sector Investment: Private sector R&D investment remains only 36%, limiting innovation. Firms prefer applied research for quick returns rather than fundamental research, which has long gestation periods.
  For example: India’s pharmaceutical industry relies heavily on government-funded institutions like CSIR for drug discovery rather than investing in independent research.
• Lack of Skilled Workforce: There is a shortage of trained researchers, engineers, and scientists, reducing innovation capacity. Many talented individuals migrate due to limited funding, career growth, and infrastructure.
  For example: The brain drain phenomenon has led to top Indian AI researchers working for Google DeepMind, Meta, and OpenAI instead of contributing domestically.
• Weak Institutional Linkages: Poor collaboration between academia, industry, and government hampers research commercialization. Universities focus on theoretical knowledge, while industries lack access to cutting-edge research.
  For example: The National Innovation Survey highlights that only 27% of Indian startups have formal R&D collaborations with academic institutions.
• Limited IP Creation: India has a low patent filing rate, indicating weak intellectual property generation. Many patents filed are not commercially viable due to low industry participation.
  For example: In 2023, India filed 64,480 patents, whereas China filed over 1.64 million, demonstrating the gap in research-to-commercialization conversion.
• Inadequate Research Infrastructure: Despite budget increases, labs, semiconductor fabs, and testing facilities remain insufficient. Funding alone cannot compensate for missing critical infrastructure.
  For example: The Semiconductor Mission aims for self-reliance, but India still imports over 90% of its semiconductors due to lack of local fabs.

Structural Challenges in Transforming India into a Research Powerhouse

• Fragmented Policy Implementation: Multiple ministries oversee R&D, causing overlapping regulations and inefficiencies in fund allocation and project execution.
  For example: The Startup India initiative has R&D components under DPIIT, DST, and NITI Aayog, leading to fund disbursement delays.
• Weak Innovation Ecosystem: India lacks venture capital, incubation centers, and robust startup funding. Investors hesitate to fund high-risk R&D ventures due to unpredictable returns.
• Slow Technology Transfer Mechanisms: The transition from lab research to commercial products is inefficient, with limited incentives for research institutions to collaborate with industry.
  For example: ISRO’s NavIC satellite navigation system has potential for commercial use but is yet to be fully integrated into consumer electronics.
• Lack of Advanced R&D Facilities: Cutting-edge research requires high-end testing labs, AI computing clusters, and semiconductor fabs, which are lacking.
  For example: Indian AI research depends on foreign cloud computing infrastructure like Google TPU and NVIDIA GPUs due to local unavailability.
• Regulatory and Bureaucratic Delays: Obtaining grants, clearances, and patent approvals involves lengthy bureaucratic processes, discouraging researchers and entrepreneurs.
  For example: In India, patent approval takes more than 2-3 years, whereas in China and the U.S., it takes 1-2 years, delaying market entry.

Comprehensive Measures to Transform India into a Research Powerhouse

• Enhancing Private Sector Incentives: Provide tax breaks, subsidies, and co-funding models to encourage long-term private R&D investment and participation in high-risk, high-reward projects.
  For example: The PLI scheme for electronics has boosted manufacturing; a similar PLI for R&D can drive corporate innovation.
• Strengthening University-Industry Collaboration: Set up joint research labs, incentivize corporate-sponsored PhDs, and promote technology parks to facilitate knowledge exchange.
  For example: The IIT Madras Research Park enables startups and MNCs to work alongside academia, resulting in an increase in patent filings.
• Developing World-Class Infrastructure: Establish national research centers, semiconductor fabs, quantum labs, and biotech clusters to support advanced research.
  For example: China’s Shenzhen Science Park has fueled AI, biotech, and semiconductor advancements through government-backed facilities.
• Fast-Tracking Patent Approvals and Technology Transfer: Simplify patent registration, create industry-specific R&D grant schemes, and mandate universities to commercialize research outputs.
• Attracting and Retaining Talent: Increase research fellowships, international collaborations, and high-salary R&D roles to prevent brain drain and attract global researchers.
  For example: The Ramanujan Fellowship attracts global Indian researchers, but its impact can be expanded by offering higher incentives.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Innovate to Elevate must be India’s mantra to transform into a research powerhouse. Addressing bureaucratic bottlenecks, fostering industry-academia linkages, and incentivizing private sector R&D can revolutionize the innovation ecosystem. By embracing cutting-edge technologies, boosting startups, and nurturing global collaborations, India can pave the way for a self-reliant and sustainable innovation economy.

DOWNLOAD PDF