Answer

Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) refers to interactions between humans and wildlife that lead to negative consequences for both. A total of 486 persons have been killed in wild animal attacks in Kerala between 2019-20 and 2023-24. Rapid habitat fragmentation, driven by encroachments and infrastructure projects, has intensified conflicts, particularly involving elephants, leopards, and wild boars.

Key Causes of Human-Wildlife Conflict

• Habitat Fragmentation: Deforestation, Agriculture expansion, encroachments, and monoculture plantations disrupt wildlife movement and feeding patterns, pushing animals into human spaces.
  For example: Elephant corridors like Aralam Farm (Kannur) and Chinnakkanal (Idukki) are now fragmented, leading to more human-elephant conflicts.
• Proliferation of Invasive Flora: Species like Senna spectabilis have overrun native vegetation, reducing natural food sources for herbivores and pushing them towards agricultural lands.
• Unregulated Human Activities: Tourism expansion, cattle grazing, and food waste dumping near forest edges attract wild animals, leading to frequent human encounters.
  For example: Food waste in Sabarimala pilgrimage routes has increased wild boar and monkey conflicts.
• Legal & Policy Gaps: Lack of clear regulations on compensations, culling policies, and relocation measures leads to inconsistent responses and tensions.
• Reduced Traditional Knowledge Use: Tribal communities’ traditional coexistence strategies are declining, leading to increased vulnerability to wildlife attacks.
  For example: The Kerala government plans to document tribal methods of conflict mitigation for policy integration.
• Climatic & Seasonal Variations: Droughts and rising temperatures force animals to venture into human areas for food and water, increasing conflict risks.
  For example: Kerala’s expected dry spell and extreme summer may intensify animal incursions into villages and farmlands.

Impacts of Human-Wildlife Conflict

• Loss of Human Lives & Livelihoods: Frequent wildlife attacks lead to fatalities, injuries, and economic losses for farmers, increasing distress and protests.
  For example: Crop destruction by wild elephants in Wayanad has led to farmer agitations demanding stricter wildlife control.
• Disruption of Wildlife Behavior: Constant human-animal interactions alter natural foraging and migration patterns, making some species more aggressive.
  For example: Elephants in fragmented landscapes become more nocturnal to avoid human presence, increasing unpredictability.
• Escalation of Retaliatory Killings: Frustrated farmers and villagers resort to poisoning, trapping, and illegal hunting, threatening vulnerable species.
  For example: Illegal poisoning of elephants in Palakkad due to crop raiding incidents highlights rising conflict-driven killings.
• Weakened Conservation Efforts: Conflict reduces public support for conservation, leading to demands for culling, habitat destruction, and infrastructure projects in protected areas.
  For example: Growing opposition to wildlife reserves near settlements threatens biodiversity conservation policies.

Sustainable Strategies for Mitigation & Ecological Balance

• Participatory Conflict Management: Engage local communities, tribal groups, and farmers in conservation plans, ensuring a balance between wildlife protection and human safety.
  For example: Community-led crop protection measures in Wayanad reduced elephant raids by 30%.
• Eco-Friendly Habitat Restoration: Replace monoculture plantations with native forests, develop wildlife corridors, and ensure water availability inside forests.
  For example: Kerala’s Forest Department restored 5,031 hectares of degraded land and built check dams to reduce animal migration into villages.
• Use of Technology & Infrastructure: Deploy solar fences, sensor-based early warning systems, and drone monitoring to prevent human-wildlife encounters.
  For example: AI-driven elephant tracking in Nilambur has reduced human casualties by 25%.
• Policy Reforms & Compensation Mechanisms: Establish rapid response teams, transparent compensation policies, and legal clarity on controlled animal population management.
  For example: Declaring human-wildlife conflict as a State specific disaster in 2023 enabled disaster funds for mitigation measures.

“Coexistence, Not Conflict” should be the guiding principle for Kerala’s human-wildlife dynamics. Strengthening eco-sensitive zones, community-led conservation, and technology-driven monitoring can minimize confrontations. Agroforestry, participatory forest and habitat restoration will reduce encroachments, while swift compensation mechanisms ensure stakeholder cooperation. A holistic “Living with Wildlife” model integrating traditional wisdom with modern science is imperative for long-term harmony.

DOWNLOAD PDF