Answer

India has the third-largest startup ecosystem globally, with over 1,57,000 DPIIT-recognized startups and 100+ unicorns as of 2024. However, deep tech innovation, which involves breakthroughs in AI, biotech, and quantum computing, remains limited. The Global Innovation Index 2024 ranks India 39th, reflecting gaps in R&D expenditure, risk appetite, and indigenous technological advancements.

Challenges in Deep Technological Innovation

• Market Skimming Mindset: Indian startups prioritize quick scaling and market capture over fundamental technological breakthroughs due to high domestic demand and low innovation pressure.
• Short-Term Investment Horizon: Indian venture capitalists seek returns within 5-7 years, discouraging long-term deep tech projects that require extended R&D cycles.
  For example: Indian investors back fintech and e-commerce platforms over semiconductor R&D, unlike Taiwan.
• Weak Academia-Industry Linkage: Lack of structured collaboration between universities and industries prevents commercializing academic research into marketable deep tech products.
  For example: Unlike Israel, where military-civilian tech transfer drives deep tech innovation, India lacks a robust research commercialization ecosystem.
• Absence of Export-Driven Competition: Indian firms thrive in a large domestic market with limited global exposure, reducing the need for cutting-edge innovation.
  For example: Micromax, once India’s top smartphone brand, collapsed in global markets due to lack of proprietary R&D, unlike South Korean firms like Samsung.
• Low State Support for Deep Tech: Unlike China and South Korea, India lacks state-backed strategic investments in high-tech sectors such as AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing.
  For example: China’s government guidance funds (GGFs) provide billions in patient capital, driving firms like Huawei to global leadership.

Economic, Policy, and Socio-Cultural Factors Behind the Innovation Gap

Economic Factors

• Low R&D Investment: India’s R&D spending is ~0.7% of GDP, significantly lower than innovation leaders like South Korea (4.5%).
  For example: South Korea’s export-driven conglomerate (Samsung, LG) benefited from state-backed high R&D mandates, fostering cutting-edge innovation.
• Focus on Service-Led Growth: The Indian economy is dominated by IT services rather than hardware and deep tech, limiting foundational technological advancements.
  For example: Infosys and TCS generate high revenue through software outsourcing, unlike Taiwan’s TSMC, which built world-class semiconductor manufacturing.

Policy Factors

• Inadequate Technology Incubation Ecosystem: India lacks state-supported industrial research institutions that bridge academic research with commercial applications.
  For example: Germany’s Fraunhofer Institutes enable over 7,000 patents annually, while India’s CSIR laboratories struggle with funding and commercialization bottlenecks.
• Inconsistent Policy Support: India’s fragmented policies (PLI schemes, National Quantum Mission) lack long-term strategic commitment and inter-agency coordination.
  For example: Brazil’s Embraer became a global aerospace leader due to consistent military-commercial technology transfer, unlike India’s sporadic deep tech funding.

Socio-Cultural Factors

• Risk-Averse Entrepreneurial Culture: Unlike Silicon Valley, where deep tech failures are seen as learning experiences, Indian investors and founders prefer low-risk, high-return ventures.
  For example: Elon Musk’s SpaceX survived multiple failures due to patient capital, while Indian space-tech startups struggle with limited private sector funding.
• Lack of Role Models in Deep Tech: India’s startup success stories revolve around software and platform-based businesses, not scientific innovation.
  For example: Steve Jobs and Jensen Huang inspire global deep tech founders, but India glorifies fintech and e-commerce entrepreneurs. 

Multidimensional Strategies to Transform India into a Global Innovator

• Enhancing Patient Capital Availability: India must establish long-term deep tech venture funds, offering 10-15 year investment cycles to support emerging technologies.
  For example: China’s RMB 563 trillion AI and semiconductor fund enables startups to develop moonshot technologies without short-term profitability pressure.
• Strengthening Academia-Industry Collaboration: Create technology transfer offices within universities to bridge research and industrial commercialization, ensuring funding for applied R&D.
  
• Promoting Export-Oriented Innovation: Introduce export-linked incentives, compelling Indian firms to compete globally, driving investment in high-value R&D.
  For example: South Korea’s chaebol model transformed Samsung from a local trader into a global tech powerhouse through export performance-linked subsidies.
• Creating National Centers for Frontier Technologies: Establish state-backed Centers of Excellence (CoEs) in areas like AI, quantum computing, and aerospace, providing grants, labs, and mentorship.
• Promoting Culture of Scientific Risk-Taking: Elevate scientists and deep tech founders to national prominence through awards, media narratives, and funding competitions.

Transforming India from a “market skimmer” to a “global innovator” demands a synergistic approach of higher R&D investments, streamlined regulatory frameworks, and a risk-tolerant entrepreneurial culture. Strengthening industry-academia collaboration, leveraging AI, quantum computing, and biotech, and fostering deep-tech startups can position India as a global leader. Schemes like the National Research Foundation and Startup India must drive this vision forward.

DOWNLOAD PDF