Core Demand of the Question
- Highlight the concerns due to delay in conducting India’s decadal population with respect to federal representation, and social equity.
- Discuss the implications of postponing the Census on welfare schemes and electoral delimitation.
|
Answer
The delay in India’s decadal population census, originally scheduled for 2021, now postponed to 2027, raises serious concerns. This postponement affects federal representation, social equity, welfare delivery, and electoral delimitation, threatening the accuracy and fairness of governance and resource distribution.
Concerns: Federal Representation & Social Equity
Federal Representation
- Skewed Seat Allocation: Census delay prevents timely delimitation, preserving outdated population-based seat distribution.
Eg: Southern states like Tamil Nadu risk losing seats, while northern states may gain, distorting rational balance.
- Malapportionment Intensifies: Continued use of 2011 data exacerbates disparities, inflating representation for slower-growing regions.
Eg: Projections show Uttar Pradesh gaining +21 seats, while Kerala and Tamil Nadu could lose up to –16 seats.
- Reserved Seats Distorted: Delay in census skews SC/ST quota, compromising representation of marginalized groups.
Eg: Redrawing based on 2011 figures affects the proportion of 18 SC/ST seats.
- Violation of Constitutional Mandate: The Constitution requires delimitation after each census; postponement undermines federal principles.
Eg: Historic freeze on delimitation expires in 2026, but with no new census there is no fresh data.
Social Equity
- Misallocation of Resources: Welfare schemes, linked to population data, may misdirect benefits, undermining social justice.
Eg: Delay could exclude nearly 100 million people from Public Distribution System benefits.
- Targeting Errors in Welfare Programs: Programs like NFSA-PDS rely on accurate census data; delay causes inefficiency.
- Houseless & Migrant Validation Issues: Timing misalignment disrupts housing and migration surveys, impacting urban planning.
- Digital Divide: Digital census execution risks excluding vulnerable groups lacking internet access.
Eg: Large-scale reliance on apps may overlook digitally disadvantaged communities.
Implications: Welfare Schemes & Electoral Delimitation
Welfare Schemes
- Subsidy Misdistribution: Outdated data leads to over- or under-inclusion in subsidy programs.
- Health and Education Planning: Lack of updated demographic insights hampers effective resource allocation.
Eg: Planning for health, education, and infrastructure relies on accurate population data.
- Women’s Reservation Delay: Implementation of one‑third quota in assembly becomes stalled without proper delimitation.
- Data-driven Policy Weakening: Policy design lacks strength without current caste, OBC data.
Electoral Delimitation
- Delayed Redistricting: Constituencies remain unbalanced, violating equality principles.
- Regional Power Shifts: Northern states poised to gain seats, southern states may lose influence.
Eg: Political leaders like MK Stalin protested over southern state marginalisation.
- Ethnic and Caste Misrepresentation: Outdated census data misaligns SC/ST reservation per population.
Eg: Approximately 18 reserved seats may shift away from southern states.
- Contestation and Political Unrest: Demographic resentment may fuel national tensions.
Eg: Southern state coalitions oppose delimitation plans, warning of north‑south divide.
The delay of India’s decadal census undermines federal representation, disrupts social equity, misdirects welfare schemes, and stalls electoral delimitation. Swift conduct in 2026–27, with digital execution and caste data, is vital to uphold equitable governance, resource allocation, and democratic representation.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments