Recently, WTO Director-General, stressed the need to maintain the WTO’s relevance amid challenges like the U.S. blocking Appellate Body appointments, with plurilateral agreements offering a potential solution to modernize global trade rules.

About World Trade Organisation (WTO)

• WTO is the only global international trade organisation which deals with rules of trade between nations. 
• The WTO commenced operation on 1st January 1995, under the Marrakesh Agreement, signed on 15 April 1994 by 124 nations.
• It has replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) which commenced in 1948.
• Created by: Uruguay Round negotiations (1986-94)
• Members: 166  members
• Headquarters: Geneva, Switzerland.

Organisational Structure Of WTO

• Ministerial Conference: It is the highest decision making body of the WTO, meeting at least every two years.
• General Council: It oversees the WTO’s day to day operation, and meets regularly at the Headquarters Geneva. 
  • It also acts as Trade Negotiations committee, the Dispute Settlement body, and the Trade policy review body.
• Dispute Settlement Panels: Established to examine specific trade disputes between WTO members and issue reports with findings and recommendations.
• Appellate Body: Reviews appeals from decisions by WTO dispute settlement panels. Its rulings play a vital role in interpreting and upholding WTO rules.

Relevance of WTO in the Present Time

• Foundation for Global Trade Rules: The WTO continues to provide a legal framework for global trade, ensuring rules are consistent and binding. 
  • The WTO’s role in the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) and its continued advocacy for trade liberalization in sectors like agriculture and services.

• Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM): Even with its current challenges, it provides a platform for resolving trade conflicts between members, promoting predictability and legal certainty in global trade.
  • India’s victory in the US anti-dumping duties case is a key example where the WTO DSM was instrumental in resolving a trade dispute.
• Multilateral Framework for Trade: The WTO facilitates multilateral negotiations, providing a platform where diverse countries, especially developing economies like India, can advocate for their trade interests.
  • The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) negotiated in the WTO framework, focusing on simplifying customs procedures, was a key achievement in making global trade more efficient.
• Global Trade in Goods and Services: The WTO continues to be pivotal in regulating global trade in goods and services, ensuring that countries comply with established trade standards.
  • The WTO’s agreements on services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) are key for countries like India, which is a global leader in IT services.
• Adaptation to Emerging Trade Issues: The WTO is attempting to adapt to new trade dynamics, such as digital trade, e-commerce, and environmental sustainability.
  • The WTO has initiated discussions on e-commerce and investment facilitation, areas that were previously underrepresented in the global trade framework.

Issues faced by the WTO as a Multilateral Agreement

• Consensus-Based Decision-Making is Ineffective: WTO’s reliance on consensus makes it hard to address complex trade issues, especially with 166 countries.
  • The Doha Development Agenda (DDA) faced deadlocks due to differing priorities between developed and developing countries.
  • Over 20 years, DDA progress stalled, highlighting the inefficiency of consensus-based decision-making.
• Stagnation in Multilateral Negotiations: The WTO struggles to make progress on key issues like agriculture and market access.
  • Agricultural subsidies remain contentious, with India opposing the WTO’s 10% subsidy cap.
  • The Doha Round has stalled, and market access talks have yielded little progress.
• Inability to Address Emerging Trade Issues: The WTO framework struggles with modern challenges like e-commerce and environmental regulations.
  • E-commerce is a growing issue, but the WTO lacks a comprehensive framework.
  • While plurilateral agreements on e-commerce exist, they are outside the WTO framework.
• Dysfunctional Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM): The Appellate Body has been non-functional since 2019, delaying dispute resolution.
  • The US blocked new appointments, preventing the DSM from operating effectively since 2017.
• Protectionist Policies and Trade Wars: Growing protectionism undermines the WTO’s core principles.
  • The US-China trade war escalated with tariffs, disrupting global markets.
  • Tariffs imposed by the US and others have caused significant market disruptions.
• Increasing Proliferation of Free Trade Agreements (FTAs): As WTO negotiations stall, countries turn to FTAs, bypassing the WTO framework.
  • India signed FTAs with the EU, Australia, and ASEAN, often conflicting with WTO rules.
  • In 2025, the number of FTAs surpassed 600, up from less than 100 in 2000.
• Limited Ability to Adapt to Global Economic Shifts: The WTO struggles to address global issues like climate change and technology-driven trade.
  • RCEP goes beyond the WTO’s scope, addressing investment and environmental sustainability.

Key Trends in Global Trade Dynamics

• Shift from Multilateralism to Regionalism: The growth of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) and Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) has overshadowed the traditional multilateral approach.
  • RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and EU Trade Agreements have become more prominent as multilateral negotiations like those within the WTO stagnate.
• Rise of Digital Trade and Technology: The expansion of digital trade is transforming global commerce, driven by advancements in e-commerce, data flows, and artificial intelligence.
• • The US-Japan Digital Trade Agreement addresses issues like data privacy, cross-border data flow, and digital taxation.
• Growing Protectionism: Protectionist policies are on the rise, as countries prioritize domestic industries and security concerns over global trade integration.
• • The US-China Trade War has seen both countries imposing tariffs and trade barriers, disrupting global supply chains.
• Global Supply Chain Shifts: The global supply chain is undergoing restructuring due to factors like the pandemic, geopolitical instability, and rising labor costs.
• • RCEP focuses on regional supply chains, which is reshaping trade patterns across Asia-Pacific.
• Environmental Sustainability in Trade: Environmental concerns are now a key driver in trade discussions, with countries and corporations emphasizing sustainability and green trade policies.
• • There is increasing integration of sustainability clauses in trade agreements, influencing the global flow of goods and services, especially in industries like energy and manufacturing.
• The Role of Developing Economies: Developing countries are increasingly asserting themselves in global trade negotiations, focusing on inclusive growth and fairer trade practices.
• • India’s push for more inclusive trade terms in agreements like the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) highlights the role of developing economies.
• Impact of Trade Wars and Geopolitical Tensions: Geopolitical tensions, particularly between major powers, are reshaping trade patterns and influencing countries to align with strategic partners.
• • The US-China trade war and Brexit have highlighted the link between geopolitics and trade policies.

Alternative Trade Mechanisms to the WTO

• Plurilateral Agreements (PAs): Trade agreements among a subset of WTO members focusing on specific issues like e-commerce, investment, or intellectual property.
  • The Information Technology Agreement (1996) eliminated tariffs on tech products, benefiting countries covering 90% of world trade in IT.
  • Offers flexibility and faster negotiations compared to WTO’s consensus-based approach.
• Bilateral and Regional Free Trade Agreements (FTAs): Trade agreements between two or more countries to liberalize trade and address specific sectors.
  • India has signed numerous FTAs with countries like the EU, Australia, and ASEAN, to secure trade benefits.
• Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): A mega-regional trade agreement between 15 Asia-Pacific countries, including China, Japan, Australia, and India.
  • Focuses on broader economic integration, including investment and environmental sustainability, going beyond WTO frameworks.
• Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA): A proposed agreement to establish a comprehensive trade area across the Americas, promoting regional integration.
  • Promotes liberalization and cooperation among member states without waiting for global consensus at the WTO.

Plurilateral Agreements (PAs)

• Plurilateral agreements are trade agreements between a subset of WTO members, focusing on specific issues or sectors. 
• Unlike multilateral agreements that require the participation of all WTO members, PAs involve a smaller group of countries that agree to specific commitments while allowing other WTO members to join at a later stage.
• Types of PAs:
• • Exclusive PAs: The benefits of the agreement are limited to the participating countries, and non-participants do not receive benefits unless they join.
    • Example: The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) or the Hague Code of Conduct.
  • Open (MFN-based) PAs: The benefits of the agreement are extended to all WTO members on a Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) basis, even if they are not participants. Non-participating countries can opt to join later.
    • Example: The Information Technology Agreement (ITA), which eliminated tariffs on IT products, benefiting countries accounting for over 90% of global trade in IT products.

Benefits of Plurilateral Agreements (PAs)

• Flexibility in Addressing Specific Issues: PAs allow countries to focus on particular sectors or issues that may not be possible in broader, multilateral negotiations.
• Faster Negotiations: PAs can proceed more quickly as they involve fewer countries and less complexity than multilateral negotiations, speeding up trade liberalization.
• Bypass Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations: When the WTO consensus proves difficult, PAs allow like-minded countries to address pressing issues without waiting for full global agreement.
• Potential for Expansion to Multilateralism: PAs can evolve from limited agreements to multilateral solutions as more countries join and benefit from the agreement.
• Promotes Regional Cooperation: PAs can promote regional cooperation among neighboring countries, strengthening economic ties and improving regional trade networks.

Way Forward for the WTO

• Adopt “Variable Geometry” for Plurilateral Negotiations: Allow countries to participate in plurilateral agreements based on issues of interest, without requiring full consensus.
  • This will reduce deadlocks and let like-minded countries address specific trade issues.
• Introduce Threshold Criteria for Participation: Set criteria, like a share of global trade, for countries initiating plurilateral discussions.
  • This ensures important economies lead negotiations and allows others to join later.
• Shift to Majority Rule: Use majority rule for deciding which issues should be addressed through plurilateral negotiations.
  • This will allow the WTO to address critical trade issues faster.
• Integrate Plurilateral Outcomes into the WTO Framework: Make plurilateral outcomes binding and integrate them into the WTO’s rules.
  • This ensures that plurilateral agreements become part of the global trade system.
• Reform Decision-Making Processes: Reform the WTO’s decision-making to be more flexible and responsive to global changes.
  • This will allow the WTO to address current trade challenges more quickly.
• Promote FTAs, PAs, and the WTO: Use FTAs and PAs as tools that complement the WTO framework.
  • FTAs and PAs drive trade liberalization, while the WTO ensures global coherence.
• Encourage Inclusivity in Plurilateral Agreements: Gradually expand plurilateral agreements to include more developing economies.
  • This promotes inclusive growth and gives developing countries a chance to influence global trade.

Conclusion

Plurilateral agreements offer a pragmatic solution to modernize WTO rules, addressing its challenges like consensus deadlocks and the non-functional Appellate Body. By integrating PAs and reforming decision-making, the WTO can remain relevant, ensuring inclusive and sustainable global trade, particularly for developing nations like India.

DOWNLOAD PDF