Answer

Introduction

Student suicides in India, particularly among young adults, are a pressing ethical and social concern. The Mental Healthcare Act (2017) and National Suicide Prevention Policy (2021) provide legal and policy frameworks for prevention, yet gaps in awareness, infrastructure, and enforcement necessitate a critical evaluation and reform-focused approach.

Body

Efficacy of Existing Legal and Policy Frameworks (Strengths and Limitations): 

A. Mental Healthcare Act (2017)

Strengths

• Decriminalization of Suicide Attempts: Section 115 ensures individuals who attempt suicide are treated with care rather than punished.
  Eg: Karnataka and Kerala reported improved reporting of suicide attempts among students post-2017.
• Right to Mental Healthcare: Guarantees access to mental health services for all students.
  Eg: University mental health cells in Delhi and Bengaluru provide free counseling services.
• Mandatory Awareness: Schools and colleges are expected to conduct awareness programs.
  Eg: Some CBSE-affiliated schools introduced peer-counseling programs under the Act.

Limitations

• Lack of Trained Counselors: Many institutions still lack qualified psychologists.
  Eg: Survey by AIIMS (2023) revealed 70% of Indian colleges have no on-campus mental health professionals.
• Enforcement Gaps: Poor monitoring in rural and remote areas reduces effectiveness.
  Eg: States like Bihar and Jharkhand report delayed implementation due to administrative constraints.
  

B. National Suicide Prevention Policy (2021)

Strengths

• Preventive Focus: Emphasizes early detection, awareness, and intervention for high-risk groups, including students.
  Eg: Pilot training programs for teachers in Maharashtra schools to identify warning signs.
• Cross-Sector Collaboration: Promotes coordination between education, health, and social welfare departments.
  Eg: Kerala’s state-level task force integrates education and health officials for proactive interventions.
• Community-Based Programs: Encourage engagement of parents, NGOs, and peer networks.
  Eg: NGOs like iCall and Vandrevala Foundation run helplines and peer-support programs.

Limitations

• Implementation Gaps: Many districts have not yet operationalized Suicide Prevention Cells.
  Eg: As of 2024, over 40% of districts in Uttar Pradesh lack active monitoring cells.
• Insufficient Funding and Data: Lack of consistent funding and centralized data hampers effective planning.
  Eg: National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data often underreports student suicides, affecting policy evaluation.
  

Reforms and Additional Measures

• Strengthening Counseling Infrastructure: Establish trained mental health professionals in all schools and colleges.
  Eg: AIIMS and NIMHANS-supported tele-counseling networks for students in rural regions.
• Mandatory Mental Health Curriculum: Integrate mental health education in school syllabi to promote awareness.
  Eg: Delhi Government pilot project on life skills and emotional resilience in secondary schools.
• Digital Helplines and AI-Based Monitoring: Use technology to provide 24×7 support and detect at-risk students.
  Eg: Vandrevala Foundation and iCall using AI chatbots to track distress patterns.
• Community and Parental Engagement: Conduct workshops and sensitization programs for families.
  Eg: Maharashtra district programs train parents to recognize behavioral warning signs.
• Robust Data Collection and Evaluation: Implement centralized reporting systems and periodic policy audits.
  Eg: NCRB collaboration with state education departments to track interventions and outcomes.

Conclusion

While existing frameworks offer a foundation, strengthening counseling, mental health education, technology-based support, community engagement, and robust monitoring is essential for ethical, inclusive, and effective prevention, ensuring student well-being and public trust.

DOWNLOAD PDF