A Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance has reviewed the performance of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) after eight years and raised concerns over haircuts, valuation practices, delays, and post-resolution hurdles.
- This report was submitted by Lok Sabha’s Select Committee, which is examining the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendment Bill, 2025, which was introduced in Lok Sabha in August 2025.
| A haircut is the difference between the amount owed and the amount recovered during resolution. |
Key Concerns Identified
- Large Haircuts: The committee flagged high haircuts taken by creditors, often due to distressed sales and poor valuation standards.
- Valuation Challenges: Assets are often valued on liquidation potential rather than enterprise value, leading to undervaluation and reduced recovery.
- Limited Bidders: A restricted pool of quality resolution applicants reduces competition, lowering final bid values.
- Lack of Transparency: The Committee raised concerns over opaque valuation processes, insufficient accountability of valuers and liquidators, and the absence of uniform SOPs.
- Accountability Issues: The Committee noted gaps in Resolution Professionals’ accountability, affecting process quality and outcomes.
- Post-Resolution Challenges:
-
- Clean Slate Issues: Companies often struggle to restart operations due to delays in obtaining regulatory clearances.
- Financing Barriers: Banks hesitate to lend to resolved entities since they remain labelled as defaulters, limiting revival prospects.
- Regulatory Vacuum: The lack of a comprehensive cross-border insolvency mechanism under IBC causes losses in high-value cases, delays settlement, and weakens asset recovery.
Recommendations to Strengthen IBC
- Enterprise-Level Valuation: The panel recommends shifting valuation towards enterprise value to better reflect the debtor’s operational potential and reduce haircuts.
- Global Bidding: To enhance competition, the Committee recommends expanding the bidder pool through international outreach, encouraging global participation.
- Standard Operating Procedures: SOPs should clearly define the roles of liquidators, registered valuers, include audit trails, and provide for post-resolution valuation reviews.
- Transparent Mechanism: The panel suggests establishing a transparent online ‘no dues’ certificate system, for Companies emerging from resolution.
- The committee strongly supported the establishment of a Cross-Border Insolvency Framework, terming it critical for India’s globalised economy.
Key Provisions in the IBC Amendment Bill 2025
- Creditor-Initiated Insolvency Resolution Process (CIIRP):
- The CIIRP provides a mechanism for settling genuine business failures outside the NCLT, thereby easing the Tribunal’s overall workload.
- The process can be initiated when 51% of creditors consent to begin the out-of-court resolution.
- Group Insolvency Framework:
- The Bill introduces a coordinated mechanism for resolving insolvency cases of companies belonging to the same corporate group.
- It allows the appointment of common resolution professionals and the formation of joint Committees of Creditors (CoCs) to streamline decision-making.
- Cross-Border Insolvency Framework: The Bill enables recognition of Indian insolvency proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, facilitating recovery from overseas assets.
- CoC’s role during liquidation:
-
- The Bill empowers the Committee of Creditors (CoC)to supervise liquidation
- The CoC gains expanded authority to supervise the liquidation process and may replace the liquidator with a 66% voting share.
|