The Department of School Education & Literacy (DoSE&L), Ministry of Education, announced the introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Computational Thinking (CT) in all schools from Class 3 onwards. 

Key Highlights

• Aim:  to prepare students for an AI-driven future by integrating technology learning into the mainstream curriculum.
• Core Objective: Promote “AI for Public Good” and integrate AI learning with “The World Around Us (TWAU).”
• Alignment: With the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE) 2023 and the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
• Implementation Timeline: From the academic session 2026–27.

Need for AI in School Education

• Building 21st-Century Skills: AI literacy fosters computational thinking, problem-solving, creativity, and ethical reasoning, essential skills in an increasingly automated and data-driven economy.  Early exposure allows students to adapt seamlessly to emerging technologies.
  • Example: Atal Tinkering Labs under NITI Aayog have introduced AI and STEM modules in 10 000 + schools, nurturing design thinking and innovation.
• Bridging the Digital Divide: AI in schools aims to democratise access to technology and digital learning, ensuring that children from rural and underprivileged backgrounds gain exposure to digital tools, narrowing socio-economic disparities in learning.
  • Example: Intel’s “AI For Youth” and CBSE skill modules have shown measurable improvements in student digital skills since 2019.
• Workforce Preparedness: Introducing AI early builds a resilient, adaptable workforce ready for new-age industries. 
  • Example: A NITI Aayog report projects that while AI could displace about 2 million jobs in India’s tech sector by 2030, it may create 4 million new roles demanding advanced digital competencies. 
• Pedagogical Innovation: AI enables personalised learning through adaptive platforms that track performance and provide instant feedback.
  • Useful for multilingual and differently-abled learners, complementing the DIKSHA and PM eVidya digital initiatives.

Government Initiatives & Policy Framework

• National Education Policy (NEP) 2020: Calls for inclusion of contemporary subjects like AI, Design Thinking, and Data Science in school curricula.
  • Promotes experiential learning, skill integration, and flexible curriculum frameworks.
• National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE) 2023: The NCF-SE 2023 operationalises the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 for school education.
  • It aims to reimagine the curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment system to promote competency-based, flexible, and inclusive learning.
  • Provides the curricular backbone for integrating AI and Computational Thinking (CT) from Class 3 onwards.
  • Anchored in the principle of “AI for Public Good” and “The World Around Us (TWAU)”, ensuring contextual and ethical grounding.
  • Aims to treat AI education as a universal literacy, not a specialised stream.
• CBSE & NCERT Initiatives: CBSE introduced AI as a skill subject for Class IX in 2019–20 and extended it to Class XI from 2020–21.
  • Constituted an expert committee to design AI curriculum for primary and secondary levels.
  • NCERT and CBSE jointly develop learning materials, handbooks, and digital content.
  • Intel–CBSE “AI For All” (2021) aimed to reach 1 million learners with a 4-hour AI literacy course in 11 Indian languages.
• Teacher Training through NISHTHA: Massive upskilling drive under NISHTHA 2.0 and video-based training modules to prepare teachers for AI pedagogy.
  • Karnataka’s Shiksha Copilot (Microsoft + Sikshana) helps teachers generate lesson plans and integrate AI.
• SOAR Programme (MSDE, 2025)
  • Skilling for AI Readiness focuses on Classes 6–12 and teachers.
  • Offers 15-hour AI literacy modules for students and 45-hour teacher training programmes.
  • Supported by a ₹500 crore budget to establish a Centre of Excellence in AI for Education, developing multilingual AI learning tools.
  • Aligned with Skill India Mission, Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) 4.0, National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme (NAPS), and Skill India Digital Hub (SIDH).

Opportunities

• Empowering Teachers: AI can automate repetitive tasks — attendance, grading, progress tracking — allowing teachers to focus on creative engagement. 
  • AI tools can also assist teachers in designing data-informed lesson plans.
• Bridging Skill Gaps: Early AI exposure aligns school education with industry 4.0 skill demands, bridging the traditional gap between schooling and employability.
• Generative AI for Engagement: Generative AI tools can produce custom quizzes, study materials, and chatbots for interactive learning, reducing learning disparities and enhancing curiosity-driven exploration.
• Personalised and Inclusive Learning:  AI enables adaptive learning systems that tailor content to each learner’s pace and comprehension. 
  • It supports multilingual and special-needs education, enhancing inclusivity in a diverse country like India.
• Fostering Innovation and Research Mindset: Hands-on AI projects and modules on AI for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) nurture innovation, encouraging students to connect technology with social problem-solving.

Challenges

• Curriculum Design and Overload:  Without clarity, “AI in schools” risks becoming a buzzword encompassing everything from coding to chatbot use. 
  • Distinguishing between AI literacy, AI-assisted learning, and AI as a subject is vital.

• Teacher Preparedness: Large-scale training and attitudinal readiness of educators remain uneven.
  • 9% of schools have only one teacher; 35% have <50 students and two teachers.
  • Many teachers lack formal qualifications; some schools lack electricity or computers.
• Digital Divide: A large proportion of students and teachers lack access to basic digital tools, making the goal appear contradictory or unrealistic.
  • For instance, 34% of Indian schools had the internet (UDISE+ 2021–22); many lacked functional computers.
  • ​​Introducing AI without addressing foundational ICT access and teacher readiness may widen existing inequalities.
• Pedagogic Mismatch: The cognitive and psychological readiness of 10–13-year-olds to comprehend complex AI systems is questionable.
  • Teaching such concepts requires specialised pedagogy, currently lacking in most schools.
  • Without contextual examples and practical relevance, these lessons may become rote exercises devoid of critical understanding.
• Equity in Implementation: Ensuring that rural and under-resourced schools benefit equally from the AI revolution.
• Data Privacy & Ethics: Need for robust frameworks to protect student data and regulate AI use in classrooms.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

Educational and Ethical Dimensions

• The Purpose of AI Education: Should AI in schools mean learning how AI works, or how to use AI responsibly?
  • True AI education must focus on:
    • Critical understanding of AI’s impact on society.
    • Ethical reasoning, data privacy, and bias awareness.
    • Responsible digital citizenship, not just coding or algorithms.
• Developmental Appropriateness: The psychology of learning demands that complex concepts like system mapping, machine learning, or neural networks be introduced after foundational scientific and mathematical maturity is built.
  • Early exposure, if done superficially, risks turning AI learning into jargon-heavy tokenism.

Psychological Impacts of AI in School Education

• Over-Reliance and ‘Dis-Education’: Psychologists warn that excessive dependence on AI tools (e.g., chatbots, content generators) can lead to “dis-education”—a gradual erosion of intrinsic motivation to learn.
  • When AI provides instant solutions, students may stop engaging in the cognitive struggle essential for creativity and problem-solving.
• Reduced Attention Span and Deep Learning: Constant exposure to AI-driven instant feedback can shorten attention spans and discourage deep reading or analytical thinking.
  • It encourages surface-level learning rather than conceptual understanding.
• Decline in Creativity and Original Thought: Algorithmically curated responses may narrow students’ imaginative capacities.
  • Overuse of generative AI tools could produce homogenised thinking, where students imitate outputs instead of experimenting and innovating.
• Social and Emotional Displacement: Surveys (e.g., Youth Pulse Survey 2025) reveal that ~57% of students use AI chatbots for emotional conversations.
  • This can reduce human interaction, empathy, and interpersonal bonding, critical for social development during childhood and adolescence.
• Risk of Technological Addiction: AI-driven platforms are designed for engagement; younger learners can develop technology dependency, manifesting as compulsive use, anxiety, or reduced patience with offline tasks.
• Data and Privacy Anxiety: Awareness that AI systems collect and analyse personal data can induce surveillance-related anxiety or mistrust among students as they grow more digitally aware.

Way Forward

• Define Clear Objectives: Clarify whether the aim is AI literacy, responsible use, or technical skill development.
• Strengthen Foundational Digital Learning: Prioritise digital access, basic coding, and computational thinking before introducing advanced AI concepts.
  • Focus on AI literacy in Classes 3–8 and AI skills (coding, NLP, data science) in higher classes.
  • Align pedagogy with cognitive stages — foundational, preparatory, and secondary.
• Teacher Capacity Building: 
  • Develop comprehensive teacher training modules and create a national cadre of AI-competent educators.
  • Encourage teachers as innovators, not just transmitters, integrating AI tools creatively.
• Curriculum Redesign:  Make AI modules contextual, age-appropriate, and ethically grounded.
  • Replace rote tests with project-based, experiential assessments.
• Ensure Ethical Safeguards: Establish AI ethics and child data protection guidelines.
  • Promote safe and responsible technology use from early grades.
• Foster Critical Thinking: Encourage inquiry-based learning,  how AI impacts society, fairness, and sustainability.
• Global Learning and Collaboration: Learn from global models — Singapore’s “AI for All”, UK’s computing curriculum, but adapt them to India’s scale and diversity.
• Equitable Infrastructure Development: Bridge the rural–urban digital gap via public–private partnerships, Skill India Digital Hub, and PM eVidya; develop offline AI modules for low-connectivity areas.

Conclusion

India’s move to integrate AI into primary education is ambitious and forward-looking, but its success hinges on readiness, clarity, and restraint. AI in classrooms should enrich human learning, not overwhelm it. Introducing complex technology too early, without pedagogic and ethical grounding, risks creating a generation fluent in tools but shallow in understanding.

DOWNLOAD PDF