| Provision |
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 |
Biological Diversity Amendment Bill 2021 |
- Approval/Intimation requirement for accessing biological resources or associated knowledge
|
Prior intimation required to SBB (for certain domestic entities)
- Entities: Indian citizens, and companies registered in India except those which require NBA approval.
- Activities: Obtaining biological resources occurring in India for commercial utilization.
- Exemptions: Use by local people and communities including growers and cultivators of biodiversity, and vaids and hakims practicing indigenous medicine.
|
Prior intimation to SBB
- Activities: Access to associated knowledge for commercial utilization will also require prior intimation
- Exemptions: Adds exemptions for:
- codified traditional knowledge,
- cultivated medicinal plants and their products,
- AYUSH practitioners; limits the exception to vaids and hakims, and AYUSH practitioners to use for sustenance and livelihood.
|
| Offenses & Penalties |
- Under the Act, failing to obtain approval or provide prior intimation for various activities are considered offenses punishable with imprisonment of up to five years, a fine, or both.
|
- The Bill decriminalizes the offenses and makes offenses punishable with a penalty between one lakh rupees and Rs 50 lakh.
|
|
|
- It allows domestic companies to use biodiversity without the permission from biodiversity boards.
|
- As per the amendments, only foreign controlled companies will require permission. This indicates companies with shares controlled by foreign companies would also be exempted.
|
- Codified Traditional Knowledge (CTK)
|
— |
- Users of codified traditional knowledge and AYUSH practitioners will be exempted from sharing benefits with local communities.
- The World Intellectual Property Organization defines CTK as “traditional knowledge, which is in some systematic and structured form, in which the knowledge is ordered, organized, classified and categorized in some manner.
|
- Sharing of Traditional Knowledge
|
– |
- As per the Bill, any person cannot share or transfer any research results on biological resources or associated traditional knowledge from India to an individual, whether for monetary gain or otherwise, without prior written approval from the National Biodiversity Authority.
- However, codified traditional knowledge can only be shared within India and does not require approval.
|
- Monitoring of Biological Resources from Foreign Countries
|
— |
- A new Section 36(A) has been added emphasizing on the monitoring of the Biological Resources obtained from foreign countries for use in India as per the provisions of the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing.
|
- Approval for Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
|
– |
- The Bill specifies distinct approval processes based on the origin of the entity. Foreign entities will require approval from the National Biodiversity Authority ( NBA ) whereas domestic entities will be required to register with NBA.
- However, domestic entities will need approval from the NBA at the time of commercialisation of IPR.
|
|
|
- The Act recognizes the rights of local communities to access biological resources and share the benefits arising from their use.
|
- The Bill removes research and bio-survey activities from the purview of benefit sharing requirements.
- Benefit sharing will be based on terms agreed between the user and the local management committee represented by the National Authority.
|