The Supreme Court allowed a minor girl from Puducherry to obtain a Scheduled Caste (SC) certificate based on her mother’s  identity, even though her father was not from an SC community.

The CJI’s Question

• Judicial Observation: During the hearing, the Chief Justice asked, “With changing times, why should caste not follow the mother?”—the first time a CJI has raised the issue so directly.
• Significance: The order does not settle the law but adds to cases, shifting the debate away from fixed lineage and towards the social conditions in which a child is raised.

Legal Framework Governing Determination of SC/ST Status

• Constitutional Basis: Articles 15 and 16 permit special measures for SC/ST communities.
• Presidential Orders: Identification of SC/ST groups is fixed by Presidential Orders under Articles 341 and 342 and is state-specific.
• Conventional Practice: Governments have followed the rule that a child takes the father’s caste, based on old circulars and customary Hindu law.
• Reservation Law Not Personal Law: Reservation is tied to social disadvantage. 

Articles 39 and 46 emphasise that benefits exist to address structural barriers, not to recognise caste as a hereditary asset.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store

Judicial Evolution on Determining a Child’s Caste

• Punit Rai Reference (2003): The Supreme Court noted that caste usually follows the father in the absence of any statutory law.
  • The court, however, did not reject the mother’s caste.
• Rameshbhai Case (2012): The court examined Punit Rai and revisited the passage from Valsamma Paul (1996) about a woman taking the husband’s caste.
• • The court held that using that passage to decide a child’s caste is “wrong and incorrect.”
  • The real test is lived experience.
  • A candidate born in a forward caste but “transplanted” into a backward caste by adoption, marriage, or conversion cannot claim reservation due to an “advantageous start in life.”
  • A child of an inter-caste couple may claim the SC parent’s caste if the evidence shows that the SC parent brought up the child, lived within that community, and experienced its social conditions.
  • The court said caste benefits cannot be treated as an inheritance.

DOWNLOAD PDF