The Supreme Court of India recently upheld a Madras High Court judgment denying a Scheduled Caste (SC) certificate to a woman born Christian but claiming to be Hindu for availing reservation benefits in employment.
Supreme Court’s Key Observations
- Conversion Without Belief as Fraud: The court ruled that religious conversion solely to claim SC benefits without genuine belief in the adopted religion constitutes a “fraud on the Constitution.”
Key Highlights of 2007 report by Justice Ranganath Mishra Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities
- Equality of Status: Suggested extending Scheduled Caste (SC) reservations to Dalits who convert to Christianity or Islam, asserting that caste-based discrimination persists regardless of religion.
- Non-discrimination Principle: Emphasized that religion should not determine access to affirmative action if caste discrimination exists.
- Recognition of Dalit Muslims and Christians: Recommended recognizing Dalit converts as SCs to ensure equitable opportunities in education, employment, and politics.
- Amendment Proposal: Suggested amending the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, which restricts SC status to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists.
- Upliftment Focus: Advocated for social justice measures to address socio-economic disparities among Dalit converts.
|
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
- Constitutional Principle and Secularism: Court emphasized India’s secular ethos, where citizens have the freedom to practice and profess their chosen religion under Article 25 of the Constitution.
- Conversion must stem from genuine inspiration and belief, not for ulterior motives like availing reservation benefits.
- Appellant’s Claim: C. Selvarani claimed to profess Hinduism and belong to the Valluvan caste, which falls under the SC category per the Constitution (Pondicherry) Scheduled Castes Order, 1964.
-
- She argued her affinity to Hindu practices, temple visits, and familial lineage in the SC community.
- No Reconversion Evidence: The appellant’s claim of Hindu identity lacked supporting evidence, as neither her baptism registration was canceled nor any declaratory suit filed.
- Family’s Christian Identity: The field verification confirmed the appellant’s family continued to practice Christianity without any attempt at reconversion.
- Fraudulent Claims Rejected:The court held that Selvarani’s claims were a deliberate attempt to exploit the reservation system without genuine conversion or belief.
Legal and Social Implications
- Impact on Reservation Policies: The judgment highlights the need for authenticity in claiming benefits reserved for specific communities.
- The misuse of reservation benefits erodes the intended social justice goals and deprives genuine beneficiaries.
- Pending Constitutional Questions: The broader issue of extending SC benefits to Dalit converts to Christianity and Islam remains unresolved.
- The 1950 Presidential Order currently limits SC status to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, but petitions challenging this are under consideration by the Supreme Court.
- Conversion Procedures: The Court underlined the necessity of clear and positive acts to signify religious conversion, such as through Arya Samaj ceremonies or public declarations.
Constitutional Provisions for Reservation
- Article 15(4): This provision empowers the state to make special provisions for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for SCs and STs.
- Article 16(4): This article allows the state to make reservations in matters of public employment for SCs and STs.
Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store
Guidelines under the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) Brochure 1993
- SC/ST Status: A person is considered a member of an SC or ST if they belong to a caste or tribe officially recognized as such.
- A person who professes a religion different from Hinduism or Sikhism is not considered an SC.
- Conversion and SC/ST Status: A person who converts to Hinduism or Sikhism may be recognized as an SC if they are accepted back into their original caste or tribe.
- Conversion to other religions generally results in the loss of SC status.
- Inter-Caste Marriages and Child’s Caste:
- In general, the child’s caste is determined by the father’s caste.
- However, the Supreme Court has recognized that social and cultural factors can influence a child’s upbringing and identity.
- In certain cases, courts may consider the child’s upbringing and environment to determine their caste.
- ST Conversion and Reservation: Unlike SCs, the ST status of an individual is not tied to their religious affiliation. A person belonging to a Scheduled Tribe retains their ST status regardless of their religious beliefs.
Affirmative Actions to Avoid misuse of Conversion
Genuine belief: The conversion must be based on a genuine belief in the new religion, not solely for the purpose of availing reservation benefits.
Substantial evidence of reconversion: If an individual reconverts to their original religion to claim reservation benefits, they must provide substantial evidence of their reconversion, such as public declarations, religious ceremonies, or documentation.
Acceptance by the original caste community: The individual must be accepted back into their original caste community after reconversion.
Preservation of caste identity: Conversion to another religion generally severs the individual’s caste identity. To claim reservation benefits, they must provide evidence of their continued association with their original caste. |
Enroll now for UPSC Online Classes
Way Forward
- Call for Genuine Affirmative Action: The judgment underscores the importance of preserving the integrity of reservation policies to achieve true social equity. Need for Policy Review: The pending deliberation on SC benefits for Dalit Christians and Muslims could redefine the contours of reservation policy.
- The 2007 Ranganath Mishra Commission report’s recommendations for extending SC benefits to Dalit converts could serve as a pivotal reference.
- Enforcement and Vigilance: Authorities must ensure stricter scrutiny and enforcement mechanisms to curb fraudulent claims.
November 28, 2024
