Recently the Supreme Court ruled that both Centre and States can levy separate taxes on broadcasting services without legal or constitutional conflict.

Key Highlight SC Ruiling

• No Overlap: The Court held that there is no factual or legal overlap as each authority taxes a distinct component of the activity.
  • Broadcasting services involve two taxable aspects, service provision (Centre) and entertainment delivery (State).
• Legislative Competence: The Centre taxes broadcasting under the Finance Act, 1994 (service tax), while States tax entertainment under respective State laws.
• Interpretation of ‘Entertainment’: The term ‘entertainment’ was interpreted broadly, including digital and home-based services delivered via smart devices.

Constitutional Provisions

• Union Power: Under  Entry 97 of Union List, Parliament’s residuary power allows it to impose service tax on broadcasting.
• State Power: Under Entry 62, State List, States have exclusive power to levy entertainment tax on content consumed by subscribers.
• Seventh Schedule Scope: The Seventh Schedule ensures division of tax powers between Centre and States, and this ruling affirms its harmonious interpretation.
• Article 246A: It empowers both Parliament and State Legislatures to make laws regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST)
• • It grants concurrent powers to the Centre and States for GST on intra-State supplies and exclusive power to Parliament for inter-State supplies, ensuring a unified indirect tax framework while respecting the federal structure

Significance of the Ruiling

• Clarity in Taxation: This judgment provides constitutional clarity on how multiple aspects of a single activity may be taxed without conflict.
• GST Rationalisation: Further streamlining under GST may be required to subsume remaining entertainment taxes and reduce taxpayer confusion.
• Judicial Guidance: This ruling sets a precedent on federal taxation powers, aiding in future interpretation of Concurrent and Separate taxation domains.

DOWNLOAD PDF