In a world-first, US researchers successfully used CRISPR-based gene editing to treat a baby named KJ with CPS-1 deficiency, a life-threatening genetic disorder.
About CPS-1 Deficiency
- Carbamoyl Phosphate Synthetase 1 (CPS-1) deficiency is a rare urea cycle disorder that impairs the liver’s ability to eliminate ammonia, with nearly 50% infant mortality.
- Symptoms: The following signs are seen in patients namely: lethargy and respiratory distress due to ammonia build-up in the body.
- Limitations of Conventional Treatment: Liver transplant is often the only long-term treatment, but infants typically aren’t ready for the procedure early in life.
- Therapeutic Breakthrough: Doctors used customised CRISPR-based gene-editing therapy called “k-abe” to correct the mutation in KJ’s genome.
- Targeted Delivery: The gene-editing tool was encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles for safe delivery to the liver.
- Outcomes: After three infusions, the baby could tolerate protein, needed lower medication doses, and began gaining weight without showing any severe side effects.
- FDA Approval: The U.S. FDA granted emergency approval for this personalized therapy, highlighting the growing acceptance of gene-editing in rare disease management.
Significance of the Success
- Clinical success of In-vivo Editing : This was the first individualized in-vivo gene-editing treatment conducted directly inside a human body.
- Customised Therapy: It paves the way for targeted treatments of thousands of rare genetic diseases where organ transplant or lifelong drug use are currently the only options.
- Precise Treatment: The use of lipid nanoparticles ensured safe and precise delivery to the liver without triggering immune complications.
What is Gene Editing Therapy?

- Gene editing therapy is a form of treatment where DNA is altered to correct defective genes responsible for disease development.
- It differs from gene therapy, which generally adds a normal gene without altering the existing one.
- Tool Used: The most common tool is CRISPR-Cas9, which acts as molecular scissors to cut and replace faulty DNA sequences.
Types of Gene Therapy
Types based on Cell Targeted
Aspect |
Somatic Gene Therapy |
Germline Gene Therapy |
Target Cells |
Somatic gene therapy targets the body’s non-reproductive cells, such as liver or blood cells. |
Germline gene therapy targets the reproductive (germ) cells, including sperm or egg cells. |
Heritability |
The genetic changes made in somatic cells are not passed onto future generations. |
The genetic modifications are heritable and can be transmitted to offspring. |
Therapeutic Scope |
It is used to treat existing patients suffering from genetic disorders or diseases. |
It aims to prevent genetic disorders from being inherited by future generations. |
Ethical Acceptability |
Somatic gene therapy is widely accepted and used in clinical practice globally. |
Germline gene therapy is ethically controversial and is currently restricted or banned in many countries. |
Risk Level |
It has a lower risk of unintended long-term consequences, as changes affect only the treated individual. |
It involves a higher risk, as unintended genetic changes can affect future generations permanently. |
Examples |
Treatment of sickle cell anemia, hemophilia, and leukemia using gene addition. |
Potential future correction of Tay-Sachs, cystic fibrosis, or Huntington’s disease at embryo stage. |
Types Based on site of Procedure: In-Vivo and Ex-Vivo Therapy
Aspect |
In-Vivo Gene Therapy |
Ex-Vivo Gene Therapy |
Definition |
Gene editing is performed directly inside the patient’s body. |
Gene editing is performed outside the body on cells extracted from the patient. |
Procedure |
Therapeutic genes or gene-editing tools are delivered to targeted tissues in the body. |
Cells are modified in a laboratory and then reintroduced into the patient’s body. |
Time and Complexity |
It reduces the overall time and complexity by avoiding cell extraction and reinfusion. |
It is more complex due to the need for cell isolation, culture, and reinfusion. |
Delivery Method |
Uses viral vectors or nanoparticles (e.g., lipids) for targeted tissue delivery. |
Uses electroporation or viral vectors in controlled lab settings for gene insertion. |
Tissue Access |
Best suited for tissues that are hard to access or modify outside the body. |
More suitable for blood or immune cells that are easily extracted and reinfused. |
Example |
CRISPR was used directly in the liver to treat CPS-1 deficiency in infant KJ. |
CAR-T cell therapy for cancer involves ex-vivo modification of T-cells. |
Applications
- Current Use: Treatment for sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, hemophilia, leukemia, and now CPS-1 deficiency.
India’s Preparedness in Gene Therapies
- Policy Framework: India has released Draft Guidelines on Gene Therapy Product Development and Clinical Trials.
- Infrastructure:Emerging biotechnology hubs such as the CSIR – Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), and National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded laboratories are conducting cutting-edge research in areas like gene editing, molecular diagnostics, and therapeutic innovation.
- Way forward: India needs to expand public investment, accelerate trial approvals, and develop affordable indigenous gene therapies for rare diseases.
- The current Outcome of Genome India Project is a welcome step in this direction.
|
- Potential Use: Could treat diseases like Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, heart disease, and other metabolic or neurodegenerative disorders.
- Emerging Use: In cancer immunotherapy, where edited cells target and kill tumor cells.
Ethical and Regulatory Roadblocks
- Ethical Concerns: Gene editing poses risks of unintended genetic mutations, long-term health consequences, and controversies around germline modifications that affect future generations.
- Informed consent becomes complex, especially in infants.
- Chances of Misuse: There’s growing fear around the potential misuse of technology for non-therapeutic enhancements, such as creating “designer babies” with selected traits, raising socio-ethical and justice concerns.
- Regulatory Oversight: The field demands strict regulatory frameworks to ensure safety, efficacy, and accountability, especially when used in vulnerable populations like newborns.
- Global Divergence: While nations like the US and China lead in trials and approvals, many countries remain cautious, citing lack of long-term safety data and unresolved ethical questions.
- Cost and Accessibility: Gene therapies are highly expensive, limiting access to affluent populations and widening healthcare inequality. Ensuring affordability remains a significant policy challenge.
Conclusion
The success of gene-editing therapy in saving an infant with CPS-1 deficiency marks a transformative leap in precision medicine. With ethical caution and regulatory clarity, such personalized genomic interventions can revolutionize the future of healthcare, including in countries like India.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.