Global Plastics Treaty Draft

7 Aug 2025

Global Plastics Treaty Draft

The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2) for the Global Plastics Treaty is being held from August 5–14, 2025, in Geneva, Switzerland.

  • The first part of the fifth session (INC-5.1) took place in Busan, Republic of Korea, from November 25–December 1, 2024.

About the Global Plastics Treaty

  • Introduction: The Global Plastics Treaty is a proposed legally binding international agreement aimed at tackling plastic pollution across its entire lifecycle, from production to disposal.

Global Plastic Pollution

  • Scale of Production: Over 460 million metric tons of plastic are produced annually, with 20 million metric tons entering the environment each year, projected to rise sharply by 2040.
  • Ecological Impact: Plastic pollution harms land, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, driving biodiversity loss, degrading habitats, and accelerating ecosystem collapse.
  • Climate Change: Plastic production and degradation contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, linking plastic pollution directly to climate change challenges.

  • Initiated By: The process was initiated through a resolution adopted at the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) in 2022, mandating negotiations for a comprehensive treaty by 2025.The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) was established by the UNEA to finalise the treaty.
  • Members: Over 170 UN member states are participating in negotiations, including developed and developing countries, Small Island Developing States (SIDS), and regional blocs such as the African Group and Group of Latin American and Caribbean Countries (GRULAC).

Need for a Global Plastics Treaty

  • Escalating plastic pollution impacts ecosystems, human health, and economies, requiring coordinated global action.
  • Fragmented national policies lack the collective force to tackle marine litter and microplastics effectively.
  • Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and vulnerable regions face disproportionate impacts despite contributing minimally to the crisis.

Previous Attempts at Finalising a Treaty

  • Early negotiations under the UN Environment Assembly (UNEA) laid the groundwork but failed to agree on compliance structures.
  • Regional agreements such as  Basel Convention amendments addressed waste trade but did not cover production, consumption, and lifecycle issues comprehensively.
  • The INC (Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee) meetings since 2023 made progress on definitions and timelines but stalled over implementation mechanisms.

Different Articles and Roadblocks to the Treaty

Article Provision / Focus Area  Roadblocks 
Article 12: Capacity Building, Technical Assistance, and Technology Transfer Mandates financial, technical, and technological support to help developing nations implement treaty obligations.

Encourages mechanisms for technology transfer, including potential IP waivers and cooperation frameworks.

Disagreement on binding vs voluntary commitments between developed and developing countries.

Divergence on control of advanced technologies and terms of access.

Article 13: Implementation and Compliance Establishes a compliance committee to promote adherence to treaty obligations.

Envisions transparent, inclusive mechanisms to ensure equity and accountability in implementation.

Division over punitive vs nonpunitive approaches; some states reject enforcement tools.

Disagreement on committee structure, authority, and decision-making powers.

Article 14: National Plans Calls for national plans to operationalize treaty objectives and coordinate domestic action.

Links plans to global reporting and monitoring frameworks for consistent implementation.

Conflict over mandatory vs discretionary nature of plans. 

Concerns about imposing uniform timelines and ambition levels on diverse economies.

Article 15: Assessment of Effectiveness Provides for periodic reviews to assess treaty performance using scientific and policy indicators.

Integrates national reporting and global evaluation for data-driven decision-making.

Lack of clarity on evaluation methods and indicators.

Risk of delays due to disputes over who defines benchmarks and reporting standards.

Article 16: Treaty Effectiveness Evaluation Establishes COP-led periodic evaluations to measure how well the treaty meets its objectives.

Uses evidence-based, scientific, and policy-relevant data for continuous improvement.

Disagreements on scope, technical vs socioeconomic and traditional knowledge indicators.

Concerns from some states about evaluations becoming compliance tools.

Article 17: Information Exchange Creates systems for data and knowledge sharing to improve transparency and evidence-based action.

Aligns with monitoring and reporting to support global and national decision-making.

Divergences on confidentiality vs public access to environmental and health data.

Resistance to mandatory disclosures due to national security and sovereignty concerns.

Article 20: Conference of the Parties (COP) Serves as the treaty’s central governing body to review implementation, adopt rules, and coordinate global actions.

Can establish scientific and technical subsidiary bodies for evidence-based guidance.

Disagreement on scope of authority, expansive vs limited powers.

Contention over decision-making, with some favouring fallback voting while others insist on consensus.

Way Forward

  • Define Clear Obligations: Developed and developing countries must agree on binding yet flexible rules for capacity building and technology transfer to avoid disputes over commitments and access controls.
  • Balance Compliance Approaches: The compliance mechanism should blend facilitation and accountability, ensuring transparency without imposing punitive measures that undermine national sovereignty or discourage participation.
  • Harmonize National Plans: National plans should remain ambitious but allow differentiated timelines and flexibility, preventing uniform standards from burdening diverse economies while maintaining global consistency.
  • Standardize Evaluation Systems: Clear methodologies and indicators for assessing effectiveness must be agreed upon, with inclusive metrics that integrate scientific, socioeconomic, and traditional knowledge for credible evaluations.
  • Empower COP Effectively: The Conference of Parties (COP) must have a well-defined mandate with structured decision-making , combining consensus with fallback voting  to ensure adaptability and prevent institutional paralysis.
Additional Reading: INC 5.1

Explore Our Test Series

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.