India’s draft Climate Finance Taxonomy framework fails to address the country’s unique climate challenges. 

What is Climate Finance Taxonomy?

• A climate finance taxonomy is a system that classifies which parts of the economy may be marketed as sustainable investments. 
• It refers to a set of standardised regulations and guidelines to inform companies and investors on making impactful investments towards environmental conservation and combating the climate crisis.
• Countries that have developed taxonomies include South Africa, Colombia, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and the European Union. 

India’s Climate Finance Taxonomy

• Released by : The Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance
• It aims to define and streamline what qualifies as ‘green’ or climate-aligned economic activity, to mobilise climate finance and prevent greenwashing.
• Objective: To guide policymakers, investors, and financial institutions on identifying and financing climate-relevant sectors and technologies.
• Applies to: Technologies, measures, projects, and activities aligned with India’s Net Zero and climate resilience goals.
• Built as a “living document”, subject to periodic updates to remain aligned with evolving national priorities.

Key Features of the Framework

Sectoral Coverage and Climate Action Areas

• Divides climate action into three pillars:
  • Mitigation
  • Adaptation
  • Transition (focused on hard-to-abate sectors)
• Sectors identified:
• • Power, mobility, buildings
  • Agriculture, food, and water security
  • Hard-to-abate industries (e.g., cement, iron, steel)

Classification of Activities

• Climate Supportive Activities:
• • Tier 1: Activities that avoid emissions absolutely or reduce emissions beyond a threshold.
  • Tier 2: Activities that lower emission intensity or support efficiency in cases where full avoidance isn’t feasible. May still have some emissions but show clear improvement pathways.
• Transition Supportive Activities: Focus on sectors where absolute emission cuts are not yet viable.

Key Issues with the Draft Framework

• Lack of Indigenous Perspective: The draft appears borrowed from international models like the EU taxonomy, without adequate adaptation to India’s context.
• Misplaced Sectoral Focus:
  • Inclusion of Low-Emission Sectors: Sectors like agriculture, food, and water security are prioritised without justification.
  • Neglect of High-Emission Sectors: High-emission sectors like energy generation, transport, chemicals, cement, plastics, manufacturing, and real estate are not adequately prioritised.
• Absence of Clear Criteria and Metrics: No scientific or data-backed rationale for choosing focus sectors.
• Vague Concepts: Undefined terms like “climate-friendly technologies” and “public consultation.”
• Weak Governance and Institutional Design: No governance mechanism defined despite India’s federal structure.
• No Cross-Sectoral Integration: Omits links between sectors and impact of consumer behavior.
• Inappropriate Hybrid Approach: Misuse of qualitative and quantitative methods without metrics.
• Ignoring Equity and Justice Principles: No integration of social aspects like labour rights, human rights, or impact on vulnerable communities.
• Lack of Measurable Metrics: No system for impact assessment or third-party verification.
• Overemphasis on Modernisation: Promotes climate resilience in agriculture using high-tech solutions while ignoring native knowledge, varieties, and traditional practices.

Recommendations for Overhaul

• Re-centre on high-emission sectors for climate finance.
• Exclude low-emission and vulnerable sectors like agriculture from transition burdens.
• Define metrics and principles rooted in science, indigenous systems and third-party verifiability.
• Establish a governance structure that includes state governments and local stakeholders.
• Incorporate ESG and social equity considerations to protect vulnerable populations.
• Recognise behavioural change and cross-sectoral linkages as strategic levers for emission reduction.

DOWNLOAD PDF