Informing Accused Grounds of Arrest: A Constitutional Requirement

Informing Accused Grounds of Arrest: A Constitutional Requirement

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that informing an accused of the grounds of arrest is not merely a formality but a mandatory constitutional requirement.

  • The Supreme Court declared the arrest of Vihaan Kumar, an accused in a financial fraud case, as unconstitutional and ordered his immediate release.
  • Failure to inform the accused of the reason for arrest amounts to a violation of fundamental rights under Article 22(1) of the Constitution.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Grounds of Arrest Under Section 47 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

  • Communication of Grounds for Arrest: Any police officer or authorized person making an arrest without a warrant must immediately inform the arrested person of the full particulars of the offence or other grounds for arrest.
  • Right to Bail for Non-Bailable Offences: If a police officer arrests a person without a warrant for an offence that is not non-bailable, the arrested person must be informed about:
    • Their right to be released on bail.
    • The option to arrange for sureties on their behalf.
  • Alignment with Previous Law: This provision is similar to Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), ensuring legal protection and transparency in the arrest process.

Supreme Court’s Emphasis

  • Burden of Proof on Police: If an arrested person claims non-compliance with Article 22(1), the burden is on the police to prove compliance.
    • The police must provide evidence that the requirement was met.
  • Magistrate’s Duty: When an arrested person is produced before a judicial magistrate, it is the magistrate’s duty to verify compliance with Article 22(1).
    • If a violation is found, the magistrate must order the accused’s release.
  • Article 21 – Right to Life & Personal Liberty: The Supreme Court stated that failure to inform the accused of the grounds of arrest also violates Article 21.
    • Such failure amounts to deprivation of liberty without due legal process.
    • The court reaffirmed that no person can be deprived of personal liberty except through a fair and legal procedure.

Constitutional Provisions for Informing Accused 

Article 22 – Protection Against Arrest and Detention in Certain Cases:

  • Article 22(1):
    • No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as possible, of the grounds for such arrest.
    • The arrested person shall not be denied the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice.
  • Article 22(2):
    • Every arrested and detained person must be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours, excluding the time required for travel to the court.
    • No person shall be detained beyond 24 hours without the magistrate’s authorization.

Previous Judicial Verdicts 

  • In Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and held that detention without a reasonable cause is unlawful. 
  • In Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, the court ruled that preventive detention could only be used in exceptional circumstances and for a limited duration
  • In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi), the court stressed the need for strict adherence to procedural safeguards in detention cases.

  • Article 22(3):
    • Clauses (1) and (2) do not apply in cases where:
      • The person is an enemy alien.
      • The person is detained under a law that provides for preventive detention.
  • Article 22(5): A person under detention should be communicated the grounds of detention order and allowed to make a representation against detention.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Cases of Preventive Detention Law

  • The detained person has the right to be informed of the grounds of detention.
    • Exception: Grounds may not be disclosed if doing so is against public interest.
  • The detained person has the right to make a representation against the detention order.
  • The detained person must be released after three months unless the advisory board recommends continued detention.

Ready to boost your UPSC 2025 preparation? Join PW’s UPSC online courses today!

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.