The Supreme Court of India has ruled that informing an accused of the grounds of arrest is not merely a formality but a mandatory constitutional requirement.
- The Supreme Court declared the arrest of Vihaan Kumar, an accused in a financial fraud case, as unconstitutional and ordered his immediate release.
- Failure to inform the accused of the reason for arrest amounts to a violation of fundamental rights under Article 22(1) of the Constitution.
Enroll now for UPSC Online Course
Grounds of Arrest Under Section 47 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
- Communication of Grounds for Arrest: Any police officer or authorized person making an arrest without a warrant must immediately inform the arrested person of the full particulars of the offence or other grounds for arrest.
- Right to Bail for Non-Bailable Offences: If a police officer arrests a person without a warrant for an offence that is not non-bailable, the arrested person must be informed about:
- Their right to be released on bail.
- The option to arrange for sureties on their behalf.
- Alignment with Previous Law: This provision is similar to Section 50 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), ensuring legal protection and transparency in the arrest process.
|
Supreme Court’s Emphasis
- Burden of Proof on Police: If an arrested person claims non-compliance with Article 22(1), the burden is on the police to prove compliance.
- The police must provide evidence that the requirement was met.
- Magistrate’s Duty: When an arrested person is produced before a judicial magistrate, it is the magistrate’s duty to verify compliance with Article 22(1).
- If a violation is found, the magistrate must order the accused’s release.
- Article 21 – Right to Life & Personal Liberty: The Supreme Court stated that failure to inform the accused of the grounds of arrest also violates Article 21.
- Such failure amounts to deprivation of liberty without due legal process.
- The court reaffirmed that no person can be deprived of personal liberty except through a fair and legal procedure.
Article 22 – Protection Against Arrest and Detention in Certain Cases:
- Article 22(1):
- No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as possible, of the grounds for such arrest.
- The arrested person shall not be denied the right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice.
- Article 22(2):
- Every arrested and detained person must be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours, excluding the time required for travel to the court.
- No person shall be detained beyond 24 hours without the magistrate’s authorization.
Previous Judicial Verdicts
- In Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and held that detention without a reasonable cause is unlawful.
- In Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India, the court ruled that preventive detention could only be used in exceptional circumstances and for a limited duration.
- In Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi), the court stressed the need for strict adherence to procedural safeguards in detention cases.
|
- Article 22(3):
- Clauses (1) and (2) do not apply in cases where:
- The person is an enemy alien.
- The person is detained under a law that provides for preventive detention.
- Article 22(5): A person under detention should be communicated the grounds of detention order and allowed to make a representation against detention.
Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store
Cases of Preventive Detention Law
- The detained person has the right to be informed of the grounds of detention.
- Exception: Grounds may not be disclosed if doing so is against public interest.
- The detained person has the right to make a representation against the detention order.
- The detained person must be released after three months unless the advisory board recommends continued detention.
Ready to boost your UPSC 2025 preparation? Join PW’s UPSC online courses today!