State RTI Commissions Face Major Delays and Vacancies

13 Oct 2025

State RTI Commissions Face Major Delays and Vacancies

Recently, a report by Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) reveals that both Central and several State Information Commissions (CIC/SICs) are understaffed or defunct, leading to massive delays in hearing RTI appeals.

Key Highlights from the Report

  • Defunct Commissions: Six SICs — Jharkhand, Himachal Pradesh, Telangana, Goa, Tripura, and Madhya Pradesh — were non-functional between July 2024 and October 2025 due to lack of appointments.
  • Partial Functioning: Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, and Madhya Pradesh are operating without full strength.
  • Central Commission: The CIC currently has only two Commissioners with nine vacancies, including the post of Chief Information Commissioner.
  • Pending Appeals: Over 2.4 lakh appeals were recorded in 2024; total pending appeals exceed 4 lakh as of June 2025.
  • Disposal Rate: With a capacity to dispose of 1.8 lakh cases annually, it would take decades to clear backlogs.
  • States with Highest Backlog: Maharashtra (95,340), Karnataka (47,825), and Tamil Nadu (41,059).
  • Institutional Shortcomings:
    • Administrative Neglect: 20 of 29 Commissions have not published their 2023–24 annual reports.
    • Penalty Non-Enforcement: In 98% of cases where penalties were applicable, none were imposed on erring Public Information Officers (PIOs).

Implications

  • Erosion of Accountability: Long delays defeat the RTI Act’s purpose of ensuring time-bound transparency.
  • Citizens’ Right Compromised: Citizens are left waiting years for access to information on public decisions and spending.
  • Administrative Apathy: Lack of proactive oversight weakens the institutional framework of transparency and public trust.

Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005

Overview

  • Establishment: Enacted  by the Parliament in June 2005, effective from 12 October 2005.
  • Based on the principle of transparency and accountability in public administration.
  • Replaced the earlier Freedom of Information Act, 2002.
  • Derives its authority from Article 19(1)(a) (Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression).
  • Aims to promote transparency, accountability, and citizen empowerment by granting access to information held by public authorities.
  • Nodal Ministry: Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions 

Key Provisions

  • Applicability: All public authorities — Central, State, and local bodies, including ministries, PSUs, and constitutional institutions.
  • Exemptions (Section 8): National security, intelligence, and personal information unless linked to corruption or human rights violations.
  • Time Limits: 
    • Within 30 days of application.
    • Within 48 hours if it concerns life or liberty.
  • Public Information Officers (PIOs): Designated in every public office to process RTI applications.
  • Information Commissions (Sections 12–15)
    • Central Information Commission (CIC) — at the Union level.
    • State Information Commissions (SICs) — at the State level.
    • Chief Information Commissioner + up to 10 Information Commissioners.
  • Appeals: Can Appeal against the PIOs, if the requests were denied or not addressed satisfactorily.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books

Visit PW Store
online store 1

Level Appointing Authority Selection Committee
Central Information Commission President of India Prime Minister (Chairperson), Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Union Cabinet Minister nominated by PM
State Information Commission Governor of the State Chief Minister (Chairperson), Leader of Opposition in Legislative Assembly, State Cabinet Minister nominated by CM


  • Tenure and Conditions: 
    • Original RTI Act, 2005: 5-year term or till 65 years of age, whichever earlier.
    • RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019: Tenure, salary, and service conditions now decided by the Central Government.
    • Removal: By the President (for CIC/ICs) or Governor (for SCIC/SICs) on proved misbehavior or incapacity after Supreme Court inquiry.

PW Only IAS Extraedge:

Constitutional and Judicial Backing

  • Article 19(1)(a): The “right to know” is implicit in freedom of expression.
  • Landmark Cases:
    • State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain (1975): Established that citizens have a right to know about government activities.
    • Union of India v. ADR (2002): Recognised the public’s right to information on candidates’ assets and criminal background.
  • These judgments shaped the RTI Act as a pillar of democratic accountability

About Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS)

  • Establishment: Founded in 2003 as Satark Nagrik Sangathan (SNS) or Society for Citizens Vigilance Initiatives (SCVI), it is a non-partisan citizens’ group.
  • Objective: Promotes transparency and accountability in governance and ensures citizen participation in government functioning.
  • Focus: Raises awareness about the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005; Encourages citizens to use RTI to obtain government information.

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.