Explore Our Affordable Courses

Click Here

Sub Categorisation Within Castes: Background, Committee, Challenges, and Way Forward

Sub Categorisation Within Castes: Background, Committee, Challenges, and Way Forward

Context: 

This article is based on the news “How the legal debate over sub-categorisation among SCs has evolved over the years which was published in the Indian Express. The Union government has established a panel of secretaries led by the Union Cabinet Secretary to categorize Scheduled Castes (SCs) into A, B, C, and D groups.

Relevancy for Prelim: Sub Categorisation Of Scheduled Castes, National Commission For Scheduled Castes (NCSC), and Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

Relevancy for Mains:  Sub Categorisation Of Scheduled Caste: Why It Is Needed?, Background, Committee, Challenges, and Way Forward.

Sub Categorisation Within Castes: Background

  • This comes in the backdrop of Prime Minister’s promise to look into the demand for sub-categorisation of SCs as raised by the Madiga community.
  • States Demand for Separate Quota:  The Union government received representations from state governments, such as Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Karnataka, advocating for the sub categorisation of Scheduled Castes (SCs), including Madigas. 
Madiga Community:

  • The Madiga community constitutes at least 50% of the total Scheduled Castes in Telangana. 
  • According to the 2011 Census, SCs form a little over 15% of the State’s population. 
  • It has expressed concerns that the benefits, including that of reservation, meant for the SC category had been cornered by the Mala community, with the Madigas being left out. 
    • They demand a separate quota for some castes within the SC quota of 15% to ensure that the benefits are equitably distributed among all castes.
  • Hearing by Constitution Bench: The matter is at present under consideration of a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court.
    • Power of sub-classifications among SCs: The Supreme court will decide if states have the power to create these sub-classifications when providing reservations or if such power is vested only with the President.
    • Constitutionality of sub-categorization: It will focus on the constitutionality of sub-categorization among Scheduled Castes (SCs) to address the reservation in jobs and education designated for them. 
  • However, the government panel will explore alternative approaches to address their grievances.

About the Committee

  • Composition of Committee: The committee comprises secretaries of the Ministry of Home Affairs, Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Department of Legal Affairs and Department of Social Justice and Empowerment.
  • Chaired by: Union Cabinet Secretary
  • Mandate of Committee: 
    • To assess and devise a strategy for the fair distribution of benefits, schemes, and initiatives for the most marginalized communities among the 1,200 Scheduled Castes nationwide. 
    • To address the overshadowing of interests of SCs like Madigas and other such groups by relatively more forward and dominant ones.

What is Sub Categorisation within Caste?

  • About:  It refers to further classifying broader caste groups into sub-groups based on various criteria. 
  • Objective: It attempts to address the diversity within larger caste groups and provide targeted benefits to specific sub-groups that may be perceived as socially and economically disadvantaged.
  • Demand for Sub Categorisation of Caste: Over time, some castes and communities have sought recognition and specific privileges based on their unique characteristics, historical backgrounds, or socio-economic status. 

What is the Presidential List?

  • The Central List of Scheduled Castes and Tribes is notified by the President under Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution.
  • The consent of the Parliament is required to exclude or include castes in the List and the states cannot unilaterally add or pull out castes from the List.
  • As per Article 341, those castes notified by the President are called SCs and STs.
  • Variation Across States: A caste notified as SC in one state may not be a SC in another state. 
  • These vary from state to state to prevent disputes as to whether a particular caste is accorded reservation or not.
  • No community has been specified as SC in Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland, and Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep.

Need for Sub Categorisation within Castes

  • Unequal Opportunities: The policy of protective and compensatory discrimination leads to disproportional representation of sub-castes in employment, education, and legislature.
    • In Tamil Nadu, a 3% quota within the Scheduled Caste quota is accorded to the Arundhatiyar caste, after Justice M S Janarthanam report stated that despite being 16% of the SC population in the state, they held only 0-5% of the jobs.
  • Graded Inequalities: There have been graded inequalities among SC communities and even among the marginalized, some communities have less access to basic facilities. 
    • The relatively more forward communities among them have managed to avail benefits consistently while crowding the more backward ones out. 
  • Overcoming Hierarchy: The SCs category is not homogenous and comprises a wide range of communities with distinct cultural, social, and economic characteristics.
    • According to the annual report of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, there were 1,263 SCs in the country in 2018-19. 
    • Some SC communities may have made progress in education, employment, and socio-economic development, while others continue to face significant disadvantages.
  • Securing Social Mobility: The reservation policy is ineffective in providing benefits to every sub-caste group at a uniform level which resulted in competition and conflict between various sub-caste groups of Scheduled Castes. 
    • The acquisition of political power, educational improvement, and occupational change could become the major assets for Scheduled Castes’ upward mobility, which acts as a major factor for the demand for sub-categorization.
  • Ensuring Social Justice: Social justice emphasizes ensuring that historically marginalized communities receive fair and just treatment and that their specific concerns are adequately addressed. 
    • Sub-categorization allows for a more targeted approach in addressing the specific vulnerabilities and needs of particular SC sub-groups. 
  • Ensuring Equitable Distribution of Resources: Sub-categorization could help avoid the concentration of benefits in certain communities while others remain underserved. 
    • For this, States have tried to divide the scheduled caste quota on the grounds that caste is a form of graded inequality. 
    • Punjab created an order of preferences in 1975 within scheduled castes for recruitment.
  • 1975: Sub-Categorisation by Punjab Government
    • Punjab government divides its 25% SCs reservation into two categories:
      • Reserved for the Balmiki and Mazhbi Sikh communities (most economically and educationally backward communities).
      • Thus, they were to be given first preference for any reservations in education and public employment.
    • Rest of the SCs communities, which didn’t get this preferential treatment.
  • 1996: Formation of Justice Ramachandra Commission
    • The Andhra Pradesh government formed the Commission.
    • Recommendations: The commission proposes sub-categorisation of SCs in the State based on evidence that some communities were more backward and had less representation than others.
  • 2000: Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Castes (Rationalisation of Reservations) Act:
    • The Andhra Pradesh government introduced the Act.
    • The law contained an expansive list of scheduled caste communities identified in the state and the quota of reservation benefits provided to each of them.
  • 2004: E.V. Chinnaiah v State of Andhra Pradesh
    • In 2004, a five-judge constitution bench struck down the act for being violative of the right to equality. 
    • Arguments given by the Court: The Court held that the sub-classification would violate the right to equality by treating communities within this category differently and the SC list must be treated as a single, homogenous group.
  • Dr. Kishan Pal v. State of Punjab: In this case,  the Punjab & Haryana High Court struck down the 1975 notification.
  • 2006: Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act
    • The Punjab government attempted to bring back the law by passing this act.
  • 2010: Appeal to Supreme Court
    • The Punjab government subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court(SC) against the High Court’s decision, contending that the SC’s 2004 judgment had incorrectly concluded that sub-classification within the Scheduled Caste quota is not permissible.
  • 2014: Davinder Singh v State of Punjab. 
    • The SC referred the appeal to a five-judge constitution bench to determine if the E V Chinnaiah of 2004 required reconsideration since it needed an inquiry into the interplay of several constitutional provisions. 
      • Interpretation of the Constitution requires a bench of at least five-judges of the Supreme Court.
  • 2018: Jarnail Singh v Lachhmi Narain Gupta
    • In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the concept of “creamy layer” within SCs too. 
    • The ‘Creamy layer’ concept puts an income ceiling on those eligible for reservations
    • While this concept applies to Other Backward Castes (OBC), it was applied to promotions of SCs for the first time in 2018.
  • Matter is Pending Before 7 judges Bench: As both the Davinder Singh bench and the E V Chinnaiah bench consisted of five judges, the matter is now being heard by a larger seven-judge bench as the decision of a larger bench takes precedence over that of a smaller bench.
  • Identification and Criteria: Determining the criteria for sub-categorization can be challenging. Parameters such as socio-economic status, educational attainment, or regional factors may be considered, but reaching a consensus on these criteria can be difficult.
    • Supreme Court rulings in 1976 and 2005 empahsizes that ‘SCs are not castes, they are class’ and their protection is based on addressing untouchability, not other factors.
  • Data Accuracy and Availability: Concrete population numbers of each community and sub-community and their respective socio-economic data are necessary to decide how castes can be categorized, how much percentage should be given, etc. 
    • Obtaining accurate and up-to-date data on the socio-economic status of different Scheduled Caste communities is a challenge. 
  • Potential for Intra-group Disputes: Sub-categorization may lead to internal divisions and disputes among SC communities. 
    • Some groups may feel marginalized from the benefits, leading to social tensions within the broader  Scheduled Caste category. 
    • For instance, backwardness among  SCs  also draws from the practice of untouchability, and sub categorisation may sharpen differences within and bring in competitive affirmative action. 
  • Possibility of Fragmentation: There is a risk that sub-categorization might lead to the fragmentation of the SC community, diluting their political and social identity. 
    • This could weaken their collective strength in advocating for their rights.
  • Quota May Not be Enough: The National Commissions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes had opposed the move, arguing that just setting aside a quota within the quota would not be enough.
    • They have argued that given the disparity, even if posts were reserved at higher levels, these most backward SCs would not have enough candidates.
    • Thus, it needs to be made sure that the existing schemes and benefits reach them on a priority basis. 

Sub Categorisation Policy Being Practised Across India

  • Tamil Nadu: In 2009, it made a special reservation provision for employment and education for Arunthathiyars within the 18 per cent reservation for SCs in the state. 
  • Bihar:  In 2007, it created a group called ‘Mahadalits’ (most backward Dalits) which excluded the Chamar, Dhobi, Paswan and Dushad castes among 22 Scheduled Castes. 
    • Later in 2015, all castes were declared Mahadalit except Paswans. 
    • Bihar gave welfare scheme priority to Mahadalits and did not tamper with Constitutional reservations.
  • Haryana: In 2020, it split reservations in admissions through legislation by creating a new group of SCs called “Deprived Scheduled Castes”.
    • This group included 36 Scheduled Castes, leaving out the Chamar and Ravidasia communities.

Way Forward

  • Exploring Alternatives to Introduce Sub-Categorisation: The Union government needs to explore legal options for the same. 
    • For instance, the Attorney General of India (AGI) had opined that a constitutional amendment could be brought in to facilitate this.
    • The NCSC and NCST had opined that Article 16(4) of the Constitution already provided for States to create special laws for any backward classes it felt were under-represented.
    • The Justice Usha Mehra Committee in its 2008 report recommended the inclusion of Clause (3) in Article 341 through a constitutional amendment empowering state legislature to enact reclassification of the Scheduled Caste category subject to Presidential confirmation.
  • Data Collection and Analysis: According to legal experts, the Constitution does not  prohibit the Parliament from sub-categorising SCs or STs.
    • However, the government needs to ensure comprehensive and accurate data collection on the socio-economic conditions of different Scheduled Caste communities. 
    • This can be the only empirical basis to justify sub-categorisation of benefits and evaluating extra share of benefits required by each community.
  • Criteria Development: Develop transparent and inclusive criteria for sub-categorization, considering factors such as socio-economic status, educational attainment, and regional disparities.
    • The Andhra Pradesh government in 1996 formed a Commission of Justice Ramachandra Raju, which recommended sub categorisation of Scheduled Caste in the State based on evidence that some communities were more backward and had less representation than others. 
  • Following the Middle Path: Strike a balance between recognizing the diversity within the Scheduled Caste category and maintaining the overall unity of the community. 
    • Policies need to address the specific needs of sub-groups without causing fragmentation or weakening the collective strength of the SC community.

About NCSC and NCST

  • About: The NCSC is a constitutional body that was created to safeguard Scheduled Castes from exploitation and to advance and defend their interests in social, cultural, educational, and economic spheres.
  • Original Constitution: Article 338 of the constitution originally allowed for the appointment of a Special Officer. 
  • The special officer was designated as the Commissioner for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
  • Amendment to Article 338: The Constitution’s Article 338 was amended by the 65th Amendment Act of 1990, which  created a multi-member National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Scheduled Castes (SC) in place of the previous one-member panel.
  • 89th Amendment Act, 2003: Article 338 was amended, and the erstwhile National Commission for SC and ST was replaced by two separate Commissions from the year 2004 which were:

 

Mains Question: Critically examine whether sub-classification of Scheduled Castes is justified for ensuring equality of opportunities in public services for the most disadvantaged communities. (15 marks | 250 words)

 

Must Read
NCERT Notes For UPSC UPSC Daily Current Affairs
UPSC Blogs UPSC Daily Editorials

 

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Download October 2024 Current Affairs.   Srijan 2025 Program (Prelims+Mains) !     Current Affairs Plus By Sumit Sir   UPSC Prelims2025 Test Series.    IDMP – Self Study Program 2025.

 

THE MOST
LEARNING PLATFORM

Learn From India's Best Faculty

      

Download October 2024 Current Affairs.   Srijan 2025 Program (Prelims+Mains) !     Current Affairs Plus By Sumit Sir   UPSC Prelims2025 Test Series.    IDMP – Self Study Program 2025.

 

Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.