India’s Second 1991 Moment: Trump’s Tariffs & Economic Reforms

12 Apr 2025

India’s Second 1991 Moment: Trump’s Tariffs & Economic Reforms

US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, targeting China (125%) and others (10%) is a potential turning point for India’s economy, similar to the 1991 economic reforms.

Tariffs

Trump Tariffs (TT)

  • US President Donald Trump announced reciprocal tariffs (April 2, 2025), targeting China (125%) and others (10%).
  • Aim: Counter China’s mercantilist policies (export-led growth, import restrictions, reserve accumulation).
  • These tariffs aim to reduce the US trade deficit, which currently stands at $1.2 trillion.
  • A base tariff of 10% applies to all countries, while country-specific tariffs are imposed from April 9.
  • The US has announced the suspension of additional tariffs on India for 90 days until July 9, 2025.

China’s mercantilism:

  • Mercantilism, an economic system prevalent from the 16th to 18th centuries, aimed to increase national wealth and power through a combination of government regulation and protectionist trade policies, emphasizing exports over imports. 
  • Export-led growth model: China maintained a consumption-to-GDP ratio of just 35% in 2010, prioritizing exports over domestic demand​.
  • World’s largest exporter: China’s share of global manufactured goods exports rose from 4% in 1996 to 30% today, reflecting its aggressive export strategy​.
  • Persistent trade surplus: China has sustained massive trade surpluses for decades, stockpiling foreign reserves — a classic mercantilist move.
  • Limited market access for imports: China imposes non-tariff barriers and subsidies to restrict imports while promoting domestic champions.
  • Strategic currency policy: The managed undervaluation of the yuan for years boosted export competitiveness and discouraged imports.

Geopolitical Reactions to US Tariffs

  • China’s resolute opposition: China will impose 125 per cent tariffs on US goods.
    • This comes after the US decided to pause tariffs for 90 days on many countries, but hit China with a 145 percent tariff amid the ongoing trade wars.
  • Japan opts for negotiated settlement: Japan chose a diplomatic route, sending a team to negotiate with the US. 
    • Its goal was to protect economic interests through peaceful dialogue.
  • EU considering both options: The EU adopted a balanced approach—open to negotiations while preparing retaliatory measures. 
    • It emphasized the importance of safeguarding its €1.5 trillion trans-Atlantic trade relationship.

India’s Stance on US Tariffs

Tariffs

  • Strategic Restraint: India did not retaliate against US tariffs; instead, it opted for dialogue and negotiation.
  • Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA): Actively negotiating a BTA with the US to expand trade from $191 billion to $500 billion by 2030.
  • Government Response: Commerce Minister urged exporters to stay calm and emphasized India’s image as a trusted and stable trade partner.
  • Tariff Pause Advantage: US paused 26% reciprocal tariffs on India for 90 days (till July 9, 2025), recognizing India’s cooperative approach.
  • Opportunity Focus: India views the situation as a chance to boost manufacturing, attract investment, and integrate into global supply chains.

Impact on Indian Economy

  • Stock Market Volatility: Sensex plunged over 2,000 points on April 7, 2025, after tariff announcement.
    • Indian markets fell less than others but reflected global trade tension sensitivity​.
  • Export Sector Disruption: India faces a 26% reciprocal tariff; sectors like auto (3% of exports) and IT are hit.
    • Nifty IT fell by over 3% due to fears of reduced discretionary spending in the US​.
    • Though temporarily exempted, India’s $12.2B pharma exports to the US are vulnerable to future tariff hikes​.
  • Reduced Export Competitiveness: Higher tariffs increase product prices abroad, making Indian exports less competitive, especially in metals, electronics, and chemicals.
  • Pressure on Monetary Policy: RBI cut repo rate by 25 bps to 6% on April 9, citing global uncertainty and impact on exports​.
  • Risk of Inflation: Tariff-induced global inflation could spill into India via imported goods, affecting household budgets and input costs.
  • Uncertainty in FDI & Investor Sentiment: Unstable global environment may deter new investments.
    • India already saw FDI dip to <1% of GDP by 2025​.

1991 LPG Reforms (Liberalization, Privatization, Globalization)

  • LPG reforms, announced on July 24, 1991, marked a shift from a heavily regulated, socialist-inspired economy to a more market-oriented one.
  • The primary goals of the LPG reforms were to address the economic crisis, increase economic growth, and build foreign exchange reserves.
  • Liberalization: This involved reducing government control and regulations in various sectors, including industry, trade, and finance. 
    • This meant lowering tariffs, relaxing import restrictions, and allowing greater freedom for businesses.
  • Privatization: Ownership of government-owned enterprises transferred to the private sector
    • This was done through disinvestment and the encouragement of private sector participation in various industries.
  • Globalization: This involved opening up the Indian economy to international trade and investment. 
    • This included reducing trade barriers, attracting foreign direct investment, and integrating the Indian economy with the global market.

Opportunities for Indian Economy

  • Second 1991 Moment – Trigger for Reforms: External pressure provides the political cover needed to push trade, FDI, and industrial reforms​.
  • Boost to Manufacturing & PLI Schemes: US-China decoupling accelerates “China+1” strategy, India can attract global firms in electronics, pharma, and EVs.
    • Apple aims to shift 25% iPhone production to India by 2025.
    • PLI schemes target $520 bn manufacturing output by 2026.
  • Repositioning as Global Supply Chain Hub: China’s 125% US tariff creates space for India in manufacturing.
    • India is seen as a “trusted and reliable partner” in global trade​.
  • Boost to Bilateral Trade Talks with US: India–US BTA in progress, aiming to grow trade from $191B to $500B by 2030.
    • India’s non-retaliatory diplomacy helped pause the 26% tariff for 90 days​.
  • Greater Leverage in FTA Negotiations: Simultaneous FTA discussions with EU, UK, and CPTPP being explored.
    • India is now negotiating from a position of strategic necessity and opportunity.

The “China+1” strategy is a business approach where companies diversify their manufacturing and supply chain operations beyond China, rather than relying solely on it. 

  • Demographic & Workforce Edge: India’s prime-age (25-54), AI-ready workforce set to surpass China’s in coming years — making India more attractive to industries relocating from China​.
  • Textiles & MSME Export Boost: Indian textiles ($9.6B to US) may gain edge over China (21%) and Vietnam (19%) under new tariff regime​.
  • Rupee Trade Settlement Expansion: Rising dollar volatility and US-centric risk offers India a chance to expand rupee trade with Russia, Iran, UAE, Africa.
    • Reduces dollar dependency & improves sovereign economic autonomy.
  • Tech, Innovation & Startup Ecosystem Gains: India can attract venture capitalists (VC) and tech giants diversifying away from China.
    • Startup India, DPI (Digital Public Infrastructure), Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), UPI have already created global interest.
  • Agricultural Market Access: Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) may open up US agri markets for Indian rice, spices, and organic produce.
    • Push for farm sector R&D and tech-backed productivity growth​.

Way Forward & Reforms Needed for India 

  • Trade Policy Modernization: India’s trade-weighted import duties (12%) are among the highest globally (vs. 2.2% US, 3% China).
    • High tariffs make Indian goods less competitive, inflate costs for domestic industries, and hinder integration into global value chains.
    • Pursue “zero-for-zero” industrial goods agreements, starting with the India-US BTA as a template for upcoming EU/UK deals and eventual CPTPP accession.
  • Reform and Liberalise FDI and BITs: FDI inflows have fallen below 1% of GDP, from 2–2.5% over two decades.
    • The 2015 “model” bilateral investment treaty (BIT) mandates Indian courts for dispute resolution — a major deterrent for foreign investors.
    • Revamp BITs to include neutral arbitration mechanisms and attract long-term capital investment​.
  • Deepen Trade Integration via Strategic FTAs: India’s global export share remains low (1.8% in 2023), far below China (15.4%).
    • Expedite trade agreements with the US, UK, EU, and consider joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
  • Reform Land, Labour, and Agriculture Laws: Outdated laws constrain ease of doing business and industrial competitiveness.
    • Rollback of 2020–21 farm laws under political pressure stalled essential agricultural reform.
    • Reintroduce these reforms with better consensus-building and implementation strategies​.
  • Boost Export-Oriented Manufacturing: Job creation in India depends on scaling manufacturing exports, especially in labour-intensive sectors like textiles and toys.
    • Make in India struggled due to protectionism and neglect of such sectors.
    • India holds just 6% of the US textile market, vs. Vietnam (19%) and China (21%). TT could shift supply chains — India must seize this opportunity​.
  • Invest in R&D and AI-Ready Workforce: India’s demographic dividend is peaking; its prime-age labour force will soon exceed China’s.
    • Invest in skilling, R&D, and digital infrastructure to ride the AI and innovation wave.
    • The West is increasingly looking at India as a counterweight to China; building a skilled, export-capable workforce is critical now​.
  • Diversify International Trade Partnerships: Resume and conclude negotiations for the long-pending India-EU Free Trade Agreement by 2026 to access Europe’s $18 trillion market, particularly for pharmaceuticals, IT services, and automotive exports.
    • Proactively lead developing nations in WTO reforms while expanding rupee trade settlements to 50+ countries, building on the successful Russia-UAE payment mechanisms that bypass dollar dependence.

Conclusion

India must leverage US-China trade tensions to push long-pending reforms. Strategic alignment with the West can accelerate growth to 8%+. Second 1991 moment hinges on bold economic policy shifts.

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

Aiming for UPSC?

Download Our App

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">






    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.