Recently, the United States announced its withdrawal from the United Nations climate regime, including the UNFCCC and key climate science and energy institutions.
United States Withdrawal from Climate Change–Related Organisations
- Nature of the Decision: The United States exited the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and over 60 multilateral organisations.
- This followed its earlier withdrawal from the Paris Agreement (2015), effective January 2026.
- Reason of Withdrawal: The United States withdrew citing national interest, opposition to binding climate obligations, climate change denial under the current President of the U.S , and concerns over economic costs and regulatory constraints.
Major Climate Organisations from which the United States Withdrew
| Organisation |
Est. |
Objective |
Impact of US Withdrawal |
| United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) |
1992 |
Global framework to combat climate change |
• Weakens multilateral climate negotiations
• Reduces accountability of major emitters |
| Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) |
1988 |
Assess climate science for policymaking |
• Lower US scientific coordination
• Potential gaps in climate assessments |
| Paris Agreement |
2015 |
Limit global warming to well below 2°C |
• Harder to meet mitigation targets
• Erodes climate trust |
| International Solar Alliance (ISA) |
2015 |
Promote solar energy deployment globally |
• Symbolic setback
• No major financial loss as US gave no funding |
| International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) |
2009 |
Support renewable energy transition worldwide |
• Reduced collaboration on clean technologies
• Slower knowledge exchange |
| Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) |
2012 |
Strengthen biodiversity science–policy interface |
• Weakens integration of climate–biodiversity governance |
Implications of United States’ Exit from Global Climate Bodies for India
- Reduced Pressure : With the United States stepping away from the UNFCCC, global pressure on developing countries like India to rapidly cut emissions may temporarily ease.
- This allows India to pursue a calibrated energy transition aligned with developmental needs and energy security.
- Enhanced Leadership : The exit of the United States from platforms like the International Solar Alliance (ISA) creates space for India, along with France, to assume stronger leadership in shaping the global solar agenda, particularly for the Global South.
- Flexible Pathways: India gains greater policy autonomy to integrate climate action with poverty reduction, industrialisation, and infrastructure growth, consistent with the principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR–RC).
- Strengthening South–South Cooperation: India can deepen climate partnerships with Africa, Asia, and Latin America, promoting technology sharing and climate solutions tailored to developing-country contexts.
Challenges Emerging for US Withdrawal
- Uncertainty in Climate Finance: The United States’ withdrawal weakens the credibility of climate finance commitments under UNFCCC mechanisms, affecting predictable flows to funds like the Green Climate Fund (GCF).
- Disruption of India–US Clean Energy Cooperation: Existing collaborations in clean technology, innovation, and capacity building may slow, forcing India to recalibrate its energy transition strategies.
- Legal and Institutional Implications: Withdrawal from the UNFCCC automatically implies withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, as it operates under the Convention.
- The US loses decision-making authority in Conference of Parties (COP) negotiations, transparency mechanisms, carbon markets, and climate finance governance.
- Scientific Fallout: Exit from the IPCC reduces US participation in global climate science assessments, affecting data credibility and coordination.
- Rising Chinese Dominance: The decision risks ceding global climate leadership to China, especially in renewable energy manufacturing and supply chains.
- Fragmented Global Climate Rules: Weak multilateralism could push climate action into trade measures such as Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms (CBAMs), potentially impacting India’s exports.
Key Environmental Impact of United States Withdrawal from UNFCC
- Weakened global climate governance: Exit from the UNFCCC removes the United States from the core platform coordinating global climate negotiations and rule-making.
- Reduced climate finance credibility: Under the UNFCCC’s climate finance mechanism, developed countries agreed to mobilise at least USD 300 billion annually for developing nations’ mitigation and adaptation by 2035, with a broader goal of USD 1.3 trillion per year from all sources.
- US withdrawal risks undermining trust and predictability in achieving these targets..
- Slower global mitigation efforts: Other countries may dilute commitments, citing lack of reciprocity from one of the world’s highest emitters.
- According to the Global Carbon Project and other sources, US territorial CO2 emissions in 2024 were about 4.9 billion tonnes, roughly 12.7% of the global CO2 emissions in 2024.
- Fragmentation of climate action: Greater reliance on bilateral deals, trade measures, and carbon border taxes may lead to uneven standards and conflicts.
About the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
- The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is a multilateral environmental treaty adopted in 1992 to address global climate change.
- Objective: Its primary objective is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations at levels that prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system.
- Members: The UNFCCC has a universal membership of 198 parties (197 states and the European Union).
- As of January 2026, the United States is the only country to have withdrawn, leaving a total of 197 members (parties) without the USA.
- Key Initiatives and Mechanisms
- Conference of the Parties (COP): Annual negotiations where countries review progress and enhance climate commitments.
- Paris Agreement (2015): A legally binding framework under the UNFCCC to limit global warming to well below 2°C.
- Transparency and reporting system: Tracks national emissions, mitigation actions, and progress toward targets.
- Climate finance architecture: Oversees mechanisms such as the Green Climate Fund and Global Environment Facility to support developing countries.
|
Conclusion
While the US exit offers India short-term flexibility, it undermines global climate cooperation, finance predictability, and equitable climate governance in the long run.