Supreme Court’s Verdict on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004

Supreme Court’s Verdict on Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004

A three bench Chief Justice of India upheld the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Board Act, 2004 with exceptions regarding higher education provisions.

Key Highlights of the Judgement

  • Validation with Limitations : The Act was upheld for primary and secondary madrasa education but declared unconstitutional for higher education provisions at Fazil (undergraduate) and Kamil (postgraduate) levels.
  • Conflict with UGC Act: These levels intrude on Entry 66 of the Union List, which exclusively grants the Central Government control over higher education standards.
  • UP Madarsa Act, 2004 : It was introduced to regulate madarsa education in UP, covering subjects like Islamic studies, Tibb, and Urdu.
    • It established the UP Board of Madarsa Education, which oversees curricula, exams, and degrees Kamil and Fazil.
  • Allahabad High Court Ruling: It Quashed the UP Madarsa Act, citing violations of Articles 14, 15, and 21-A, and a lack of secular education.
    • The High court ordered the integration of madarsa students into regular UP schools.
  • Response to Allahabad High Court’s Secularism Argument: The Court clarified that constitutional validity cannot be challenged solely on grounds of Basic Structure violations.
    • For a law to be invalidated, it must clearly violate constitutional provisions related to secularism.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

State’s Right to Regulate Education

  • The State can regulate madrasa education to ensure competency standards for students, allowing them to participate in society effectively.
  • The Act allows the Madrasa Board to set curricula, teacher qualifications, and infrastructure standards without interfering in daily administration.

Minority Rights under Article 30

  • Article 30 provides minorities with the right to establish and manage educational institutions, but this right is not absolute.
  • The State can impose regulations to ensure educational standards while balancing minority rights.

Interpretation of Education under Entry 25

  • The term “education” in Entry 25 of the Concurrent List has a broad meaning, covering institutions that offer both secular and religious education.
  • Recognised madrasas primarily aim to educate, and thus fall under Entry 25’s scope.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Secular Standards as per different Constitutional Provisions

  • Article 21A (right to education) aligns with minority rights to administer educational institutions.
  • Secular Standards: The Madrasa Board can set secular education standards without affecting the institution’s minority status.
  • Religious Instruction (Article 28(3)): Article 28(3) protects students in minority institutions from being forced into religious instruction or worship if the institution is state-recognised or publicly funded.

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

Need help preparing for UPSC or State PSCs?

Connect with our experts to get free counselling & start preparing

THE MOST
LEARNING PLATFORM

Learn From India's Best Faculty

      
Quick Revise Now !
AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD SOON
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध
Quick Revise Now !
UDAAN PRELIMS WALLAH
Comprehensive coverage with a concise format
Integration of PYQ within the booklet
Designed as per recent trends of Prelims questions
हिंदी में भी उपलब्ध

<div class="new-fform">







    </div>

    Subscribe our Newsletter
    Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.
    *Promise! We won't spam you.
    Yes! I want to Subscribe.