Recently a committee of experts, chaired by Principal Scientific Advisor (PSA) Ajay Sood, has recommended that India do away with a decade-long policy of mandating Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) units in all coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs).
Rationale Behind Rolling Back of Mandate
- Low Sulphur Coal Usage: 92% of Indian coal has low sulphur (0.3%–0.5%), making universal FGD installation unnecessary, as per NIAS and IIT-Delhi data.
- Environmental Trade-offs: FGDs would raise power and freshwater use, adding 69 million tonnes CO₂ (2025–30) while only cutting 17 million tonnes SO₂, worsening climate impact.
- Cost-effective Alternatives Exist: Electrostatic precipitators by BHEL cost ₹25 lakh/MW (vs ₹1.2 crore/MW for FGD) and reduce particulate matter by 99%, offering better pollution control.
What is Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD)?
- FGD : It is a scrubbing method that utilizes an alkaline reagent, typically sodium- or calcium-based, to remove sulfur dioxide (SO₂) from the flue gas emissions of coal-fired power plants.
- Effectiveness: FGD can remove up to 95% of sulfur dioxide from flue gas, significantly reducing SO₂ emissions.
- Flue Gas Composition: Also known as exhaust or stack gas, flue gas originates from combustion plants and contains a mix of pollutants, including particulate matter (dust), sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide.
- It may contain pollutants such as particulates, sulfur dioxide, mercury, and carbon dioxide, but most flue gas consists of nitrogen oxides.
- Untreated flue gas from power plants, industrial facilities, and other sources can significantly impact local and regional air quality.
- Process Overview: In the scrubber or absorber tower, uncleaned flue gas is sprayed with a mixture of water and limestone (scrubbing slurry), which reacts with sulfur dioxide and binds it, preventing its release into the atmosphere.
Impact of Sulphur Dioxide in the Environment
- Major Air Pollutant: Sulphur dioxide is a severe environmental pollutant, harmful to human, animal, and plant health.
- Acid Rain Precursor: SO₂ contributes to acid rain, which harms forests, freshwaters, and soils.
- Acid rain disrupts ecosystems by killing insects and aquatic life forms, damaging vegetation, and reducing biodiversity.
- It causes damage to infrastructure and materials causing paint to peel and corrodes steel structures such as bridges.
- Accelerates the weathering of stone buildings and statues, eroding cultural and historic landmarks
Electrostatic Precipitators vs FGD
Aspect |
Electrostatic Precipitators |
Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) |
Primary Purpose |
Electrostatic precipitators are designed to remove particulate matter (PM) from flue gases. |
Flue Gas Desulphurisation systems are used to remove sulphur dioxide (SO₂) from emissions. |
Cost of Installation |
They cost approximately ₹25 lakh per megawatt (MW) to install. |
They are significantly more expensive, costing around ₹1.2 crore per megawatt (MW). |
Efficiency of Pollution Control |
These systems can remove up to 99% of PM emissions, making them highly effective. |
FGDs reduce SO₂ emissions but have limited impact on other pollutants like PM. |
Resource Consumption |
Electrostatic precipitators require less water and energy, making them more sustainable. |
FGDs consume more water and electricity, increasing overall environmental and operational load. |
Relevance to Indian Coal |
They are highly relevant due to the high ash content of Indian coal. |
Their effectiveness is limited, as 92% of Indian coal has low sulphur content. |
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.