The WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, adopted at the 12th WTO Ministerial Conference (2022), has officially entered into force after crossing the threshold of two-thirds of WTO members’ ratifications in 2025.
Key Provisions of the Agreement
- It is the first multilateral trade agreement with environmental sustainability at its core.
- Ban on Illegal Fishing Subsidies: Prohibits government subsidies to vessels or operators engaged in illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities.
- Overfished Stocks: Subsidies for fishing overexploited stocks are prohibited, except where they are directed towards rebuilding fish stocks to biologically sustainable levels.
- High Seas Fishing: Prohibits subsidies for fishing in unregulated high seas outside national jurisdictions and not regulated by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations/Arrangements (RFMO/As).
- Transparency Mechanism: Members must share information on subsidies and fishing practices through regular reporting.
- Special & Differential Treatment (S&DT): Developing countries and LDCs are given a two-year transition period from the date of entry into force to implement obligations.
- Committee on Fisheries Subsidies: Established to oversee implementation, review practices, and enhance transparency.
- WTO Fish Fund: Established to provide technical assistance and capacity building to developing economies and LDCs for sustainable fisheries management. (Fund announced in 2022 with ~$18 million pledged).
Global Context
- Overfishing Crisis:
- 35.5% of global fish stocks (2021) were overfished, compared to 10% in 1974.
- Around USD 35 billion spent annually on marine fishing subsidies; of this, USD 22 billion harmful subsidies contribute directly to stock depletion.
- Livelihoods at Stake: Hundreds of millions globally depend on fisheries for food, income, and employment.
- Environmental Sustainability: First WTO agreement explicitly aimed at meeting SDG 14.6 (End Subsidies Contributing to Overfishing).
India’s Position
- Sustainability Principle: India argues for the ‘polluter pays principle’ and ‘common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR)’, demanding that nations historically responsible for stock depletion should bear more obligations.
- Low Subsidiser: India provides minimal fisheries subsidies compared to advanced fishing nations. Its fisheries sector is small-scale and traditional, not industrialised.
- Livelihood Concerns: The agreement protects India’s small fishers by:
- Allowing subsidies where measures are taken to rebuild overfished stocks.
- Preventing large-scale IUU fishing by industrial fleets that deprive Indian coastal communities of resources.
Significance
- Multilateral Cooperation: Demonstrates that WTO members can deliver global solutions to shared challenges like environmental degradation.
- Balance of Interests: Seeks to protect marine resources while safeguarding livelihoods of small-scale fishers.
- Strengthening Multilateralism: Reinforces WTO’s relevance in addressing trade-linked environmental issues.
- Food Security: Ensures sustainable fish stocks, which are a vital protein source for millions.
Major Schemes with Subsidy Components
- Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY): Subsidies up to 40% (general category) and 60% (women, SC/ST) for various fisheries activities.
- Blue Revolution Scheme: Support for integrated fisheries development, aquaculture, and cold-chain facilities.
- Fisheries and Aquaculture Infrastructure Development Fund (FIDF): Concessional finance and interest subvention for big-ticket infrastructure projects such as fishing harbours, cold chains, and processing units.
- Kisan Credit Card (KCC) for Fishers: Extended to fishers and fish farmers to provide institutional credit for working capital and investment needs.
|
Additional Reading: World Trade Organisation
Additional Reading: WTO-Centred Multilateral Trade System