Answer:

Centralising admissions in higher education through standardised testing such as UGC NET has sparked debates about its impact on institutional autonomy and accessibility for students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. While it aims to streamline admissions, concerns have been raised about how it may undermine the autonomy of universities and restrict access to PhD programs for marginalised communities, affecting the overall quality of education.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Implications of Centralising Admissions in Higher Education Through Standardised Testing on the Autonomy of Educational Institutions

• Restriction on Institutional Autonomy: The centralization of PhD admissions limits the ability of universities to independently design their own admission criteria.
  For example: The UGC NET now overrides universities’ traditional methods like interviews and research proposals, standardising the process across institutions.
• Homogenization of Academic Standards: Centralised admissions through standardised testing can lead to uniform academic standards, which may stifle innovation and diversity in research fields.
  For example: The introduction of CUET for undergraduate admissions can influence the diversity of academic programs.
• Limited Faculty Influence in Selection: The new system reduces the influence of faculty in selecting PhD candidates, thus affecting academic programs that require specialised skills and deep research understanding.
• Centralised Control Over Research Programs: Institutions lose control over shaping their research agendas, as they cannot select candidates based on specific research needs.
  For example: IITs and other research-heavy institutions face challenges aligning NET-selected candidates with their research priorities.
• Diminished Academic Freedom: Universities that had autonomy in creating niche research programs now face restrictions due to the centralised testing model.
• Overemphasis on Test Scores: The heavy reliance on test scores overlooks the broader skills required for PhD-level research, such as innovation and analytical abilities.

How This Trend Affects the Accessibility of PhD Programs for Students from Diverse Socio-Economic Backgrounds

• Increased Dependence on Coaching: Students from wealthier backgrounds can afford high-cost coaching for NET, giving them an advantage over marginalised students.
  For instance: Private coaching centres offer specialised courses that are unaffordable for economically weaker sections, deepening inequality in PhD admissions.
• Limited Access to Resources: Marginalised students often lack access to the study materials and resources required to succeed in standardised tests.
  For instance: Rural students face challenges in accessing online study material and preparatory resources needed to excel in NET.
• Neglect of Regional Diversity: Centralised admissions disregard regional socio-economic factors, disproportionately affecting students from underrepresented areas.
  For instance: Candidates from remote areas, such as Northeast India, face systemic barriers in competing in a standardised admission process that does not account for their unique challenges.
• Undermining Affirmative Action: The use of standardised testing might inadvertently undermine affirmative action policies aimed at ensuring equitable access to education.
• Socio-Cultural Barriers: Centralised exams fail to account for the diverse socio-cultural backgrounds of candidates, which play a significant role in shaping their educational opportunities.
  For example: Language barriers affect many students from non-English speaking backgrounds, reducing their chances of clearing standardised tests like UGC NET.

Way Forward

• Adopt a Holistic Admission Approach: Move beyond standardised testing by incorporating interviews, research proposals, and academic portfolios in PhD admissions to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of candidates.
• Increase Accessibility to Resources: Provide targeted scholarships and support programs for marginalised students to prepare for standardised tests like NET.
  For example: Government initiatives like the Post Matric Scholarship Scheme for SC/ST and OBC students help provide financial assistance for higher education preparation.
• Promote Regional Diversity in Admissions: Tailor admissions criteria to account for regional diversity and socio-economic challenges faced by students from different parts of the country. 
• Strengthen Institutional Autonomy: Allow universities to retain autonomy over admissions by complementing centralised exams with university-specific selection processes, such as discipline-specific tests.
  For example: Delhi University uses both standardised testing and internal criteria like interviews to maintain balance between centralization and institutional freedom.
• Provide Coaching Support for Marginalised Communities: Governments and universities should offer free or subsidised coaching for NET and other entrance exams to students from disadvantaged backgrounds, bridging the preparation gap.
  For example: States like Rajasthan provide free coaching under the SC/ST Coaching Scheme, helping marginalised students prepare for competitive exams.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

While the centralization of PhD admissions through standardised testing aims for uniformity and transparency, it has significant implications for institutional autonomy and student accessibility. By restricting universities’ ability to select candidates based on diverse criteria and disadvantaged students from marginalised backgrounds, the system risks exacerbating inequality in higher education. Reforms focusing on inclusivity and flexibility are essential to ensure fair representation and diverse academic growth in PhD programs.

DOWNLOAD PDF