Answer

The Constitution of India provides a clear framework for the role of the Governor in the legislative process, primarily under Article 200. The Governor’s role in granting assent to bills passed by the State Legislature is defined by the Constitution to ensure the smooth functioning of federal governance while maintaining the balance between the executive, legislature, and judiciary.

Constitutional Position of the Governor in legislative process

• Article 200 of the Constitution: Grants the Governor the power to either grant assent, withhold assent, return the Bill for reconsideration, or reserve the Bill for the President’s consideration.
• Four Options for the Governor: Under Article 200, the Governor has four options:
  • Grant assent to the Bill.
  • Withhold assent to the Bill
  • Return the Bill for reconsideration by the Legislature (except money Bills).
  • Reserve the Bill for the President’s consideration.
• Discretionary Power: The Governor has discretion in certain matters but is bound by Article 163 to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers, except in exceptional circumstances.
• No Indefinite Delay: The Governor must act “as soon as possible”, Constitution does not provide a clear timeframe for the Governor to act on Bills
• Role in the Federal Structure: The Governor acts as a link between the state legislature and the Centre, ensuring that laws passed by the state do not conflict with central laws and the Constitution.

Limits of the Governor’s authority in granting or withholding assent

• Time Limit for Assent: The Supreme Court has set a maximum period of one month for the Governor to grant assent to a Bill after it has been reconsidered by the State Legislature. Delays beyond this period are considered unconstitutional. For Bills reserved for the President, the Governor must act within three months.
• Governor Cannot Withhold Assent Indefinitely: A Governor cannot indefinitely withhold assent to a Bill, as prolonged delays without valid reason amount to an unconstitutional “pocket veto.”
  For example: In the Tamil Nadu case, the Court declared that 10 Bills that had been pending for an unduly long period were deemed to have received assent due to the Governor’s failure to act within a reasonable timeframe.
• Governor’s Discretion Must Be Constitutional: The Governor’s discretion to withhold assent is limited by the Constitution and must be based on valid reasons, not personal or political biases.
  For example: The Governor cannot withhold assent arbitrarily; the discretion should be used only when legitimate constitutional concerns exist.
• Mandatory Requirement: According to Article 163, the Governor is required to act on the advice of the Council of Ministers except in certain exceptional circumstances. 
• Limits on Reserving Bills for Presidential Consideration: The Governor can reserve a Bill for the President’s consideration, but this must be done within three months, and only in cases of exceptional circumstances such as the Bill conflicting with national interests.
• Supreme Court’s Role in Ensuring Justice: The Supreme Court can invoke Article 142 to address unreasonable delays or inaction by the Governor, ensuring complete justice.
  For example: In the Tamil Nadu case, the Court deemed the Bills to have received assent, showing its role in protecting the integrity of the legislative process.

Way Forward

• Timely Decision-Making: The Supreme Court has suggested that Governors should avoid delaying assent indefinitely and make timely decisions.
• Prompt Communication: The Governor should promptly communicate with the state legislature, providing reasons for withholding assent or referring bills to the President.
• Clarification on Discretionary Powers: A clearer constitutional or judicial framework is required to define the limits of the Governor’s role and discretion.
• Establishing Clear Guidelines: Setting clear guidelines for the Governor’s actions in granting assent will promote transparency and accountability.
• Enhanced Accountability: The Governor’s actions should be open to parliamentary or judicial review if they appear politically motivated.
• Strengthening Judicial Oversight: Strengthening judicial oversight will prevent misuse of the Governor’s powers and ensure compliance with constitutional principles.

The Governor has significant authority under the Constitution to assent bills, and this authority must be used in accordance with the Constitution. In order to support legislative effectiveness and democratic integrity, the Supreme Court promotes prompt decisions, accountability, and adherence to the Council of Ministers’ advice.

DOWNLOAD PDF