Answer

The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), signed in 1960 between India and Pakistan, governs the distribution of the waters of the Indus River System. It allocates the Eastern Rivers (Beas, Ravi, Sutlej) to India and the Western Rivers (Indus, Chenab, Jhelum) to Pakistan. As water resources emerge as strategic assets in geopolitics, this treaty has shaped both cooperation and conflict in India-Pakistan relations. India’s recent notices seeking to modify the treaty reflect the evolving challenges in transboundary water management.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Water Resources as Strategic Assets in Geopolitics: Shaping Regional Cooperation 

• Control over Shared Water Resources as a Leverage Tool: Shared water resources often become tools for political leverage in geopolitics, influencing negotiations and regional power dynamics.
  For example: The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) grants India control over Eastern Rivers, strengthening its ability to develop infrastructure for energy and irrigation projects.
• Water Diplomacy as a Means of Regional Cooperation:Transboundary water-sharing agreements facilitate dialogue, fostering peace and cooperation among neighboring nations.
  For example: The Mekong River Commission exemplifies how coordinated efforts among Southeast Asian countries prevent conflicts over shared river resources.
• Joint Responses to Climate Change: Regional cooperation on shared water resources can address environmental challenges, ensuring sustainable usage and management.
  For example: The Mekong River Commission facilitates cooperation among Southeast Asian nations to tackle climate-related impacts on water flow and usage.

Water Resources as Strategic Assets in Geopolitics: Shaping Regional Conflict

• Growing Water Scarcity Escalating Tensions: Water scarcity due to overuse and climate change intensifies competition, leading to conflicts between nations sharing transboundary rivers.
  For example: Pakistan’s repeated objections to Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects highlight fears of reduced water availability for agricultural and domestic needs.
• Infrastructure Development on Shared Rivers Intensifying Conflicts: Upstream nations developing dams or other infrastructure often create tensions with downstream nations over perceived water flow restrictions.
  For example: Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam on the Nile River has caused disputes with Egypt and Sudan over water availability and usage rights.
• Weaponization of Water Resources: Nations may use water diversion or blockage as a tool during conflicts, creating further instability.
  For example: China’s dam-building on the Brahmaputra River raises concerns in India regarding potential water flow manipulation.

Challenges of Transboundary Water Management: India-Pakistan Context

• Diverging Interpretations of the Indus Waters Treaty: Misinterpretations of treaty clauses create conflicts, especially over hydroelectric projects, undermining trust between India and Pakistan.
  For example: Pakistan claims Kishenganga and Ratle projects violate IWT provisions, while India argues they comply with the treaty’s “run-of-the-river” specifications.
• Political Hostility Amplifying Water Disputes: Decades of political tensions hinder bilateral negotiations, preventing effective transboundary water management and cooperation.
  For example: Pakistan’s insistence on involving the Permanent Court of Arbitration reflects its lack of trust in bilateral mechanisms for resolving disputes.
• Climate Change Impacting Water Availability: Changes in precipitation patterns, glacial melt, and extreme weather events exacerbate challenges in ensuring equitable water-sharing agreements.
  For example: Climate-induced variability in Chenab River flows has raised concerns in Pakistan over its agricultural dependence on consistent water supply.
• Prolonged Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Lengthy processes for resolving disagreements delay effective water management, worsening conflicts over shared resources.
• Weaponization of Water: Pakistan often accuses India of using water as a geopolitical tool, while India views Pakistan’s obstructionism as a threat to its development aspirations.
• Cross-Border Terrorism Undermining Trust: Persistent terrorism originating from Pakistan impacts India’s confidence in engaging cooperatively on transboundary water-sharing issues.
  For example: India’s recent notice to modify the IWT cites Pakistan’s cross-border terrorism and non-compliance with treaty provisions as key reasons for review.

Opportunities Posed by Transboundary Water Management in India-Pakistan Relations

• Promoting Bilateral Cooperation: Transboundary water management can promote dialogue and trust between India and Pakistan by addressing shared concerns like water scarcity and flood management.
  For example: The Indus Waters Treaty has facilitated cooperation even during periods of heightened tensions, enabling consistent water-sharing for over six decades.
• Joint Infrastructure Development: Collaborative hydroelectric and irrigation projects can enhance regional development and energy security for both countries.
  For example: The Tulbul Navigation Project could benefit both nations by improving navigation and water regulation in the Jhelum Basin.
• Climate Change Mitigation: Shared management of water resources can help address challenges posed by glacial melting, water shortages, and seasonal variability due to climate change.
  For example: The Chenab Basin studies conducted by India and Pakistan aim to assess glacial runoff impacts on river flows.
• Economic Integration: Cooperation on water resources can strengthen trade and economic ties, boosting agriculture and industry across borders.
  For example: Pakistan’s reliance on Indus water for agriculture underscores the potential of joint agricultural planning to enhance productivity.
• Enhancing Regional Stability: Successful transboundary water management can set a precedent for broader regional cooperation on natural resources, reducing conflict risks.
  For example: The Permanent Indus Commission has helped resolve technical disputes, showcasing how water diplomacy can support peacebuilding.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Future of the Indus Waters Treaty in Light of India’s Recent Notices Seeking Modification

• Increased Focus on Modern Needs: India’s notices highlight the need to address changing demographics, energy demands, and climate impacts in revising treaty provisions.
  For example: India seeks to modify the treaty to accelerate hydroelectric projects like Kishenganga and Ratle for clean energy generation.
• Potential Renegotiation Risks: Revisiting the treaty may escalate tensions, as Pakistan perceives modifications as threatening its water security and agricultural economy.
  For example: Pakistan has opposed India’s Kishanganga project, claiming it violates downstream water availability requirements.
• Environmental Considerations: The treaty must adapt to address environmental challenges like pollution, waterlogging, and glacial melt to ensure long-term sustainability.
• Strengthening Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Modifications may focus on creating more robust mechanisms for addressing technical disputes without escalating to political or legal conflicts.
  For example: The recent decision on Kishanganga underscores the need for streamlined arbitration processes.
• Geopolitical Implications: India’s push for treaty revisions reflects its growing regional influence and strategic goals, potentially altering South Asia’s geopolitical landscape.
  For example: India’s emphasis on clean energy projects under the treaty aligns with its global climate commitments and regional power aspirations.

The future of the Indus Waters Treaty depends on cooperative water management and diplomatic engagement between India and Pakistan. To ensure stability, both nations must prioritize dialogue, adapt to changing geopolitical realities, and consider sustainable water use. Strengthening the treaty could foster regional cooperation and mitigate future conflicts.

DOWNLOAD PDF