Answer

The case highlights the conflict between urban governance and social equity in a mid-sized city. Street vendors, relying on their trade for survival, have encroached upon a designated no-vending zone near a bustling marketplace, disrupting traffic and prompting complaints from local shopkeepers. Balancing public order, fair business practices, and the economic vulnerability of vendors poses an ethical and administrative challenge.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Ethical Issues Involved

• Right to Livelihood vs. Public Order: Street vendors rely on vending for survival, supporting their families. However, their presence causes congestion and disrupts public order. A balance is needed to protect their livelihood while maintaining traffic flow and public safety.
• Fair Competition vs. Equity: Shopkeepers view vendors as unfair competition due to their lower costs and informal operations. However, vendors often belong to economically weaker sections. The solution must protect equity while ensuring that shopkeepers’ interests are not unfairly harmed.
• Balancing Economic Development and Social Welfare: While economic development is crucial for a thriving city, social welfare policies must ensure that vulnerable groups, like street vendors, do not face disproportionate hardship. Fair and just policies should integrate both economic growth and the welfare of marginalized communities.
• Humanitarian Concerns: Many vendors are breadwinners for their families, supporting elderly dependents and school-going children. Displacing them without alternatives could worsen their socio-economic conditions, making compassion essential in decision-making.
• Trust in Governance: Decisions must be transparent and inclusive, addressing the concerns of all stakeholders. Excluding any group could lead to unrest and weaken trust in the administration’s ability to govern fairly.

Options Available

Option 1: Strict Enforcement of No-Vending Zone: This option involves rigorous enforcement of the existing no-vending zone policy, meaning that street vendors would be removed from the area where vending is not allowed. 

Option 2: Relocate Vendors to a Designated Area: This option involves moving street vendors from the current no-vending zone to a designated vending area specifically created for their activities. The new location would be selected by the municipality, ensuring it does not interfere with public safety, traffic flow, or shopkeepers’ businesses. 

Option 3: Temporary Time-Based Vending: This option involves allowing street vendors to operate during designated hours rather than throughout the day, specifically during non-peak hours. 

Option 4: Collaborative Stakeholder Solution: This option involves bringing together all stakeholders, street vendors, shopkeepers, the general public (represented through civic bodies or associations), social welfare groups, and the municipal administration, for a dialogue-based decision-making process. 

Selected Course of Action

The best approach is a two-step solution:

• Short-Term Solution:
  • Implement a time-based vending schedule in the no-vending zone to allow vendors during non-peak hours while maintaining traffic flow.
  • Increase monitoring during peak hours to ensure public safety and minimize congestion.
• Long-Term Solution:
  • Develop a designated vending zone with essential facilities such as sanitation and drinking water, ensuring vendors have a sustainable space to operate.
  • Introduce a licensing system to regulate the number of vendors and prevent overcrowding.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Rationale: This approach addresses the immediate needs of vendors and shopkeepers while building a sustainable framework for the future. It balances public order, economic fairness, and compassionate governance, ensuring all stakeholders feel heard and supported.

Addressing the needs of street vendors, shopkeepers, and the public requires a balanced approach that focuses on both economic and social well-being. Government programs like the PM SVANidhi Scheme provide financial support, while the Street Vendors Act, 2014 protects their rights. In the future, offering skill development, creating more vending zones, and promoting digital platforms will help vendors thrive and integrate into the city’s economy.

DOWNLOAD PDF