Answer

India’s economic disparity among states presents a challenge to cooperative federalism, impacting balanced development, resource sharing, and policy implementation. With developed states like Maharashtra and Gujarat attracting more investment, and less-developed states struggling with limited resources, this divide hampers equitable growth. The widening gap between rich and poor states calls for concerted efforts to ensure inclusive economic development across the nation, reinforcing the principles of cooperative federalism.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

How Economic Disparity Among Indian States Challenges Cooperative Federalism

• Uneven Resource Allocation: States with lower GDP struggle to secure adequate resources, affecting their public services and infrastructure, leading to over-reliance on central assistance.
  For example: Northeastern states heavily depend on central funds, limiting their autonomy in policy-making.
• Differences in Investment Attraction: Wealthier states attract higher investment due to advanced infrastructure, while economically weaker states face a lack of investment, reinforcing the economic gap.
• Public Service Disparity: Economic disparity impacts public service quality, where poorer states face challenges in healthcare, education, and basic amenities, undermining federal principles.
• Policy Implementation Imbalance: Economic disparity causes challenges in implementing central policies uniformly, with wealthier states showing better outcomes than poorer counterparts.
  For example: Schemes like Swachh Bharat saw quicker implementation in developed states, while resource-strapped states lagged in execution.
• Migration and Regional Tensions: Disparities in job opportunities cause migration from poorer to richer states, leading to workforce imbalances and regional tensions, straining federal relations.
  For example: High migration rates from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi and Maharashtra highlight unequal opportunities, impacting social dynamics in host states.

Factors Responsible for Economic Disparity Among Indian States

• Unequal Natural Resource Distribution: States rich in natural resources attract more industries, while others with limited resources face slower growth and dependency.
  For example: Jharkhand’s mineral wealth enables mining-based revenue, while resource-scarce states rely on agriculture.
• Varying Levels of Industrial Development: Developed states with advanced industrial bases have robust economies, while others lag due to minimal industrialisation.
• Infrastructure Gaps: Poorer states often lack adequate infrastructure, deterring investors and limiting economic growth compared to better-equipped states.
  For example: Poor road and rail connectivity in Assam hampers its economic potential compared to well-connected states like Punjab.
• Differences in Educational Attainment: States with higher literacy and skill levels experience better job creation and economic stability, widening the gap with less-educated states.
  For example: Kerala’s high literacy rate supports its service sector economy, unlike regions with lower literacy rates.
• Governance and Policy Differences: Effective governance fosters economic growth; states with better governance attract more investment and manage resources more efficiently.

Way Forward to Address Economic Disparities

• Focused Infrastructure Development: Prioritise infrastructure development in economically weaker states to attract investment and stimulate growth, ensuring balanced regional development.
  For instance: Improved rail and road connectivity in northeastern states can enhance trade and economic activities.
• Special Economic Zones (SEZs): Establish SEZs in lagging states to promote industrialization, create job opportunities, and bridge the development gap with wealthier states.
• Equitable Resource Sharing: Implement policies that ensure fair resource distribution, enabling all states to contribute to and benefit from national economic growth.
  For instance: Central schemes allocating funds based on need rather than revenue potential can support poorer states more effectively.
• Promotion of Skill Development: Enhance skill development programs in lagging states to boost employment and productivity, promoting economic self-reliance.
  For example: Expanding Skill India initiatives in economically weaker regions can generate local employment opportunities.
• Improving Governance and Transparency: Promote transparent and accountable governance in less-developed states, improving investment climate and reducing corruption-related growth barriers.
  For instance: Initiatives like e-governance and transparency reforms can streamline processes in states struggling with bureaucratic inefficiencies.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Addressing economic disparities among Indian states is critical for strengthening cooperative federalism and achieving inclusive growth. As Dr. B.R. Ambedkar aptly said, “The progress of any society depends on the progress of the weakest sections.” By implementing equitable policies, fostering industrialization, and focusing on regional infrastructure, India can reduce the development divide and pave the way for balanced and sustainable progress across states.

DOWNLOAD PDF