Answer

Judicial backlog is a significant challenge in India, with over 4 crore pending cases across various courts. A primary factor in this backlog is excessive judicial adjournments, which delay case resolution and hinder justice delivery. Despite efforts to streamline proceedings, frequent adjournments continue to stall progress. Addressing this issue requires understanding its root causes and implementing systematic reforms.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

Excessive Judicial Adjournments as a Contributor to Backlogs

• Delayed Case Resolutions: Frequent adjournments extend the duration of cases, sometimes taking years or even decades for final resolution, affecting the efficiency of the judiciary.
• Increased Litigation Costs: Each adjournment adds to the overall expenses of litigation, creating a financial burden on parties, especially those from lower socio-economic backgrounds.
• Compromised Access to Justice: Extended timelines due to adjournments restrict access to timely justice, impacting public confidence in the judicial system.
  For instance: Criminal cases involving undertrials often see multiple adjournments, delaying justice and impacting the accused’s right to a fair and speedy trial.
• Strain on Judicial Resources: Adjournments occupy valuable court time, which could be used to address other cases, thus reducing the system’s overall efficiency.
• Impact on Witness Testimonies: Delays caused by adjournments can lead to witness fatigue, memory erosion, and sometimes withdrawal, compromising the quality of evidence and case outcomes.
  For instance: In cases of witness intimidation, frequent adjournments lead to witnesses retracting or altering their statements, affecting the verdict.

Underlying Causes of the Culture of Frequent Adjournments

• Legal Provisions for Adjournments: Procedural codes provide leeway for adjournments, allowing lawyers to exploit this flexibility for strategic advantages.
  For example: The Code of Civil Procedure permits adjournments under certain conditions, but this is often misused to delay proceedings.
• Caseload on Judges: High caseloads and limited court staff contribute to frequent adjournments, as judges struggle to allocate sufficient time to each case.
  For instance: In lower courts, judges are often overburdened, handling hundreds of cases monthly, resulting in postponed hearings.
• Tactics by Litigants: Parties may intentionally seek adjournments to delay proceedings for personal or strategic reasons, such as delaying financial liabilities or postponing adverse decisions.
  For instance: In property disputes, defendants sometimes request repeated adjournments to prolong occupancy without resolution.
• Inefficient Case Management: Absence of effective case management systems means that cases are not scheduled or monitored efficiently, leading to unnecessary adjournments.
  For instance: Courts lacking digital case-tracking systems face administrative inefficiencies, making it harder to monitor case progress and reduce delays.
• Shortage of Legal Professionals and Staff: Limited availability of trained court personnel, especially in rural areas, leads to procedural delays and frequent requests for adjournments.

Remedial Measures to Address the Issue

• Stringent Limits on Adjournments: Amend procedural codes to restrict the number of adjournments granted, particularly in civil and criminal cases.
  For instance: Certain high courts have introduced reforms to limit adjournments to a maximum of three per case, improving case resolution timelines.
• Case Management Systems: Implement digital case management tools to streamline scheduling, monitor case progress, and allocate court resources effectively.
  For example: The e-Courts Project aims to introduce digital systems for efficient case tracking, enhancing transparency and reducing unnecessary delays.
• Incentives for Timely Case Disposal: Introduce performance incentives for judges and court staff to encourage efficient disposal of cases and minimize adjournments.
  For instance: States have implemented schemes that recognize and reward judicial officers for adhering to case timelines, promoting accountability.
• Increased Judicial Appointments: Address the shortage of judges by appointing additional personnel, particularly in overburdened courts, to improve case handling capacity.
  For instance: Recent government initiatives to appoint additional district judges have helped reduce caseloads in some high-pendency regions.
• Legal Awareness and Training for Lawyers: Conduct workshops to educate lawyers on ethical practices, discouraging unnecessary adjournment requests and promoting timely case resolution.
  For instance: Legal bodies have initiated continuous professional development programs, aiming to instill a culture of efficient case handling.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

Reducing judicial adjournments is essential for addressing India’s judicial backlog and enhancing justice delivery. By adopting measures like case management, limiting adjournments, and expanding judicial capacity, the judiciary can make progress toward an efficient system. It is rightly said, “Justice delayed is justice denied,” underscoring the urgency for timely reforms to ensure fair and equitable justice for all.

DOWNLOAD PDF