Answer

Bilateral Trade Agreements (BTA) are treaties between two nations that facilitate trade and investment by reducing barriers such as tariffs and import quotas. In FY24, the bilateral trade between India and the US stood at a record US$ 118.2 billion, making the U.S. India’s largest trading partner. Recent discussions focus on critical minerals, technology transfer, and market access, strengthening economic ties between both nations.

India and the U.S.A Negotiating a Multi-Sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA)

• Objective of the BTA: The agreement aims to enhance bilateral trade in multiple sectors by reducing tariffs and trade barriers, fostering economic integration between India and the U.S.
  For example: The India-U.S. Joint Leaders Statement (2025) emphasized creating a mutually beneficial BTA.
• Compliance with WTO Laws: The BTA must align with WTO’s Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle or qualify as an interim agreement leading to a Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
• Focus on Market Access: The BTA seeks to lower tariff rates on American goods, potentially benefiting key U.S. industries like energy, electronics, and medical devices in the Indian market.
  For example: India considers reducing tariffs on U.S. apple imports, allowing American apple exporters to regain competitiveness in the Indian market.
• Strategic Significance: The BTA strengthens India’s position as a reliable trading partner and boosts geopolitical ties amid global trade shifts and China’s economic dominance.
• Potential Economic Shifts: The BTA may lead to sectoral adjustments, with some Indian industries benefiting from U.S. investments, while others face increased competition from U.S. firms.
  For example: U.S. tech companies investing in India’s AI sector could accelerate innovation but may challenge local startups.

Impact on India’s Trade Policy, Economic Growth, and Strategic Relations

Way Forward

• Ensuring WTO Compliance: India should structure the BTA as an ‘interim agreement’ leading to an FTA, maintaining WTO consistency.
  For example: The India-UAE CEPA Agreement (2022) followed WTO guidelines, ensuring smooth trade facilitation.
• Balancing Market Access and Domestic Protection: India must negotiate sectoral safeguards, ensuring domestic industries aren’t adversely affected.
  For example: India could seek phased tariff reductions in sensitive sectors like dairy and agriculture.
• Expanding Trade Beyond the U.S.: India should diversify trade partnerships to avoid over-reliance on the U.S., strengthening ties with the EU, ASEAN, and Africa.
  For example: India’s EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations aim to create a more balanced trade portfolio.
• Strengthening Domestic Manufacturing: India must boost local production capacity through PLI schemes, making exports competitive under the BTA.
  For example: The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for electronics aims to reduce dependency on Chinese imports.
• Leveraging Strategic Alliances: India should align the BTA with initiatives like QUAD and Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF) for broader geopolitical gains.
  For example: India’s cooperation with the U.S. in critical minerals and defense production aligns economic and strategic goals.

A balanced and equitable BTA can be a game-changer for India’s trade diversification, technology transfer, and investment inflows. To maximize gains, India must ensure WTO-compliant safeguards, sectoral competitiveness, and regulatory alignment. A forward-looking strategy integrating Make in India, PLI schemes, and digital trade frameworks will cement India’s role as a global economic powerhouse while reinforcing strategic ties with the U.S.

DOWNLOAD PDF