Answer

Strategic autonomy refers to a nation’s ability to pursue independent defense and foreign policies without external influence. India, while strengthening defense ties with the US, particularly through agreements like BECA, LEMOA, and COMCASA, faces a dilemma. Balancing indigenous defense capabilities and external collaborations remains crucial for long-term security and self-reliance.

Strategic Dilemma Between Technological Advancement and Strategic Autonomy

• Dependence on U.S. Tech: India’s growing reliance on U.S. engines and systems for indigenous projects like Tejas and AMCA risks operational constraints based on U.S. strategic interests.
  For example: The U.S. halted F-35 fighter jet deliveries to Turkey due to geopolitical disagreements.
• Short Shelf Life of U.S. Policies: Defense frameworks like Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI) and recent pacts often lack continuity due to shifting U.S. foreign policy.
  For example: The U.S. exit from Afghanistan disrupted military coordination with regional partners.
• Asymmetry in Capabilities: The U.S. dominates in defense R&D, making India more of a technology recipient rather than an equal partner.
  For example: The India-U.S. jet engine deal (2023) still depends on American discretion regarding technology transfer.
• Potential Strategic Pressures: U.S. alliances and sanctions policies could affect India’s military readiness if India pursues independent foreign policy choices.
  For example: CAATSA sanctions threat over India’s S-400 purchase from Russia tested India’s strategic autonomy.
• Impact on Diversification: Over-reliance on the U.S. could limit India’s established partnerships with Russia, Israel, and France, affecting supply chain security.
  For example: Russia supplies 36% of India’s arms, ensuring resilience against Western policy shifts.

Balance with reference to India’s indigenous defense production goals and geopolitical constraints.

India’s Indigenous Defense Production Goals

• Aatmanirbhar Bharat in Defense: India aims for self-reliance through initiatives like Tejas Mk2, AMCA, and Kaveri engine projects.
  For example: Tejas Mk1A production ramp-up intends to reduce fighter jet imports.
• Public-Private Collaboration: Strengthening domestic defense PSUs and private firms ensures indigenous manufacturing and technology absorption.
  For example: L&T’s involvement in K9 Vajra artillery production enhances domestic capacity.
• Export-Oriented Defense Strategy: India seeks to become a global arms supplier, reducing dependence on foreign imports.
  For example: BrahMos missile exports to the Philippines mark India’s rise in global defense trade.

Geopolitical Constraints

• Balancing U.S. and Russia Relations: Dependence on U.S. technology risks jeopardizing India’s strategic ties with Russia, its primary defense supplier.
• Navigating Indo-Pacific Security Architecture: Strengthening QUAD ties with the U.S. must be balanced with India’s independent regional role.
  For example: India’s non-alignment in AUKUS prevents entanglement in U.S.-China conflicts.
• Managing Dependence on Foreign Technology: Delays or restrictions in foreign defense supplies can impact India’s operational readiness.
  For example: Delays in Rafale jet delivery due to France’s domestic issues highlight import vulnerabilities.

Way Ahead

• Enhancing Domestic R&D: Investing in indigenous technology development can reduce dependency on foreign defense firms.
  For example: DRDO’s Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) development strengthens India’s defense manufacturing capabilities.
• Balanced Multi-Alignment Strategy: India should maintain diversified defense partnerships with multiple nations to avoid over-reliance.
  For example: Defense agreements with Israel and France ensure alternative technology access.
• Technology Transfer in Foreign Deals: Insisting on local manufacturing and full technology transfer in defense procurements will enhance self-reliance.
  For example: AK-203 rifle production in Amethi is a step towards self-sufficiency.
• Stronger Private Sector Role: Encouraging private firms through policy incentives will strengthen the defense industrial base.
  For example: Tata’s partnership with Airbus for C-295 aircraft fosters indigenous manufacturing.
• Strategic Autonomy in Policy Decisions: India must ensure that foreign defense partnerships do not compromise its independent foreign policy choices.
  For example: India’s neutral stance on the Ukraine conflict reflects its commitment to strategic autonomy.

India must balance technological modernization with strategic autonomy by leveraging defense ties for joint production, technology transfers, and capacity building. Strengthening Atmanirbhar Bharat in defense, diversifying suppliers, and enhancing indigenous R&D through initiatives like iDEX and DRDO reforms will ensure resilience, minimizing over-dependence while securing national interests in a shifting geopolitical landscape.

DOWNLOAD PDF