Answer

The prolonged vacancy of the Deputy Speaker’s office violates Article 93 of the Indian Constitution, which mandates its prompt election. Unwritten conventions have historically upheld parliamentary norms alongside constitutional provisions. This issue highlights the importance of these conventions in sustaining democratic balance.

Concerns regarding prolonged vacancy of Deputy Speaker

• Violation of Constitutional Mandate: Articles 93 and 94 state the Lok Sabha “shall” elect a Deputy Speaker “as soon as may be,” yet six years have passed without filling the post. This undermines the constitutional intent.
• Erosion of Parliamentary Conventions: Traditionally, the Deputy Speaker is offered to the Opposition to promote bipartisan cooperation. Leaving the post vacant breaks this long-standing norm.
• Concentration of Power: Without a Deputy Speaker, all presiding authority rests with the Speaker typically from the ruling party weakening the informal check that an Opposition Deputy would provide.
• Procedural Vulnerability: In the event of the Speaker’s absence, resignation, or incapacity, there is no clear successor to chair proceedings, risking disruption of legislative business.
• Weakened Democratic Balance: A vacant Deputy Speaker’s chair signals reluctance to share power and diminishes the Opposition’s role. This reduces transparency and accountability in parliamentary debates.

Role of unwritten conventions in sustaining democratic balance

• Facilitates bipartisan cooperation: The convention of offering the Deputy Speaker’s post to the Opposition promotes working relationships across parties, reducing adversarial gridlock.
• Maintains a check on majoritarian rule: Conventions temper the ruling party’s dominance by distributing key offices, ensuring minority voices are heard in procedural decisions.
• Fills gaps in the written Constitution: Where Articles 93 and 94 lack timelines, conventions impose an informal deadline that Parliament has respected historically.
• Builds institutional resilience: Regular adherence to conventions acclimatizes members to normative power-sharing, strengthening democratic norms beyond legal mandates.
• Adapts to evolving political contexts: Unwritten conventions can evolve more swiftly than statutes, allowing Parliament to respond flexibly to new challenges while preserving balance.

Potential benefits of legal enforcement of conventions for accountability

• Ensures clear timelines and responsibilities: Codifying conventions (e.g., a deadline for electing the Deputy Speaker) removes ambiguity, compelling timely action and preventing prolonged vacancies.
• Reduces arbitrary decision-making: Legal requirements force ruling parties to follow established norms rather than delaying or bypassing them, allowing consistency and fairness.
• Increases transparency: A statutory framework outlines clear procedures that makes it easier for citizens and the media to monitor compliance and hold Parliament accountable.
• Imposes enforceable consequences: Legislation can specify penalties if conventions are ignored, creating real deterrents against non-compliance.
• Reinforces separation of powers: By embedding conventions into law, the legislature asserts its autonomy from executive interference, ensuring parliamentary processes are respected independently.

Limitations of codifying conventions in a flexible democracy

• Risk of rigidity: Conventions often evolve to suit changing political contexts. Once codified, they may become inflexible and slow to adaptation.
• Over-reliance on formal mechanisms: Legal mandates may reduce genuine cross-party dialogue to mere procedural compliance, weakening cooperation.
• Potential for legal disputes:  Statutory conventions can trigger litigation over interpretations, diverting courts from core legislative issues.
• Legislative gridlock: Codification may politicize cooperative norms, enabling parties to exploit loopholes and delay key appointments.
• False sense of certainty: Strict rules may ignore nuanced situations where flexible, unwritten principles better serve democratic needs.
  

Unwritten conventions uphold democratic stability by complementing constitutional mandates. In times when political expediency undermines constitutional morality, respectful adherence, supported by selective statutory reinforcement can safeguard institutional accountability, ensuring effective governance and preserving the spirit of India’s parliamentary democracy.

DOWNLOAD PDF