Answer

The Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) in India governs the receipt and utilisation of foreign funds by civil society organisations (CSOs) to ensure that foreign influence does not compromise national security. Since its amendment in 2020, foreign contributions have been closely regulated, affecting around 22,000 NGOs. The law ensures transparency while allowing CSOs to pursue development, but it raises concerns regarding their operational flexibility.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

National Security Challenges Posed by Foreign Funding to Civil Society Organizations

• Potential Foreign Influence on Policy Making: Foreign-funded CSOs can influence domestic policies in ways that may not align with national interests, raising concerns about sovereignty.
  For example:  Amnesty International India faced accusations of opposing the development of nuclear power plants in Tamil Nadu, purportedly backed by international anti-nuclear lobbies.
• Misuse of Funds for Anti-State Activities: There have been instances where foreign funds were allegedly misused for activities undermining national security, such as funding protests or insurgent movements.
  For example: Greenpeace India was accused of using foreign funds to campaign against India’s coal and mining projects, leading to its FCRA licence suspension in 2015.
• Undermining Development Projects: Foreign-funded NGOs have been known to oppose large-scale infrastructure projects, allegedly under the influence of foreign interests, which affects national growth.
  For example: Protests against the POSCO project in Odisha were reportedly backed by foreign-funded CSOs, delaying a crucial economic project.
• Data Security Risks: Foreign funding often comes with demands for data sharing, which can pose cybersecurity threats if sensitive information is mishandled or transferred to foreign entities.
  For instance: Concerns were raised over NGOs sharing developmental data with foreign donors without adequate safeguards.
• Weakening National Unity: Foreign funding can sometimes exacerbate communal or regional divides, as certain organisations use foreign funds to push sectarian agendas that threaten national cohesion.

Balancing National Security with Civil Society Functioning through FCRA

• Ensuring Transparency in Funding Sources: FCRA mandates that CSOs disclose their funding sources, which ensures transparency while allowing legitimate organisations to function without undue interference.
  For example: NGOs like Pratham, which focus on education, adhere to FCRA guidelines, maintaining transparency while contributing to social development.
• Scrutiny of Suspicious Organisations: FCRA allows the government to scrutinise organisations suspected of misusing foreign funds, ensuring that only legitimate CSOs contribute to nation-building.
  For instance: Several NGOs were de-registered in 2017 for violating FCRA norms, ensuring national security.
• Facilitating Developmental Work: The regulation ensures that organisations engaged in genuine developmental activities can continue receiving funds while preventing misuse for anti-national activities.
  For example: NGOs working on rural health initiatives, like SEWA, continue to receive foreign aid within the FCRA framework, contributing to local development.
• Balancing Freedom of Expression: FCRA maintains a balance by not restricting CSOs from engaging in advocacy or human rights work, provided they comply with national laws, ensuring that critical voices are not silenced.
  For example: Organisations like Amnesty International India have been scrutinised, but many other human rights NGOs continue to function within the legal framework.
• Periodic Reviews for Efficiency: The FCRA framework allows for periodic reviews of registered NGOs to ensure that they are compliant with the law while allowing CSOs to adapt to changing national and international circumstances.
  For example: The recent FCRA amendments introduced the requirement for organisations to use only one bank for foreign funds, enhancing financial transparency.

Suitable Way Forward for Regulating Foreign Funding

• Strengthening Capacity Building for CSOs: The government could invest in capacity-building initiatives for NGOs, helping them comply with FCRA regulations and enhancing their ability to access foreign funds responsibly.
• Promoting Collaboration with National Agencies: Encouraging CSOs to collaborate with government agencies can ensure alignment with national interests while maintaining operational flexibility for development work.
  For instance: The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan saw participation from several NGOs, demonstrating effective collaboration between civil society and the government.
• Creating a Transparent Reporting Framework: Establishing a transparent and user-friendly digital portal for NGOs to report foreign contributions could enhance compliance and reduce bureaucratic delays.
  For instance: An enhanced digital FCRA platform, similar to the GST portal, could streamline fund reporting processes.
• Differentiating Between Advocacy and Development Work: The FCRA framework could distinguish between advocacy-oriented NGOs and development-focused NGOs, applying different standards for each while ensuring national security.
• Engaging in Global Best Practices: Learning from global practices, such as the United Kingdom’s transparency laws or Australia’s foreign influence transparency scheme, can help refine India’s FCRA model.
  For example: India could adopt a tiered system of regulation, where larger NGOs with significant foreign funding face more scrutiny than smaller grassroots organisations.

Check Out UPSC CSE Books From PW Store

India’s regulation of foreign funding through FCRA strikes a delicate balance between national security and the functioning of civil society organisations. While FCRA safeguards the nation from external interference, it also ensures that legitimate CSOs can operate effectively. By adopting global best practices and enhancing collaboration, India can foster a robust civil society ecosystem while ensuring national interests are upheld in the future.

DOWNLOAD PDF