Core Demand of the Question
- Discuss how sustainable peace in Manipur requires socio economic development alongside security measures.
- Challenges in maintaining sustainable peace in Manipur.
|
Answer
Introduction
Manipur, straddling South and Southeast Asia, has long faced ethnic tensions and insurgency rooted in deprivation and poor connectivity. This week’s tripartite pact with Kuki-Zo groups and the reopening of a key highway mark steps toward combining security with development for lasting peace.
Body
Sustainable peace in Manipur requires socio-economic development alongside security measures
- Reducing grievances through economic opportunities: Poverty and unemployment fuel violence; socio-economic development offers alternatives and reduces reliance on militancy.
Eg: In Manipur, prolonged blockades disrupted trade and employment; reopening NH-2 can restore economic activity and reduce economic frustration.
- Strengthening social cohesion: Education, healthcare, and infrastructure projects bridge community gaps and promote interdependence.
Eg: Building schools and hospitals in both Meitei-dominated valleys and Kuki-Zo hill areas can encourage interaction and mutual trust.
- Addressing identity and land-related disputes: Land rights and resource allocation are core triggers of conflict. Socio-economic policies that fairly distribute resources can reduce territorial tensions.
- Enhancing political participation and representation: Economic empowerment boosts political participation and weakens support for insurgency.
Eg: Training programs for youth from marginalized groups in Manipur can increase their participation in local governance, reducing support for armed groups.
- Complementing security measures with long-term solutions:Security alone curbs violence temporarily; addressing socio-economic gaps ensures lasting peace.
Eg: The new Suspension of Operations (SoO) pact in Manipur provides security, but combining it with economic rehabilitation and infrastructure development ensures durable peace.
Challenges in maintaining sustainable peace in Manipur
- Persistent Distrust Across Communities: Despite the pact, Meitei groups called it “fuel to the fire,” showing deep mistrust remains.
- Fragile Nature of Peace Initiatives: Past attempts like bus services between divided areas led to casualties, revealing the fragility of trust-building.
Eg: Even symbolic steps toward reconciliation risk escalating violence.
- Sporadic Violence Despite Security Deployment: Heavy security cannot fully prevent violence rooted in unresolved socio-political conflicts.
- Unresolved Core Issues: Root causes; identity, land rights, representation, economic opportunities remain unaddressed.
- Weak Political Leadership and Trust Deficit: Political leadership has failed to inspire confidence, leaving dialogue stillborn.
Eg: The unilateral termination of SoO in March 2023 worsened relations and eroded trust in governance.
Conclusion
The renewed SoO pact and reopening of NH-2 are important steps, but sustainable peace requires inclusive dialogue on identity, land, and representation. Coupled with rehabilitation of displaced communities and socio-economic development, a Prime Ministerial push could build momentum. True stability rests on combining security, justice, reconciliation, and development.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Latest Comments