Answer

Delimitation is the process of redrawing boundaries of parliamentary and assembly constituencies to ensure equitable representation based on population changes. It is conducted by the Delimitation Commission under Article 82 and Article 170 of the Constitution. The freeze on delimitation since 1976, based on the 1971 Census, was extended till 2026 by 84th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2006 with the same objective of encouraging population limiting measures.

Concerns About Proportional Representation in Southern States

• Demographic Disparity: Southern states with lower fertility rates and stable population growth may lose parliamentary seats, reducing their voice in national decision-making.
  For example: Tamil Nadu’s population growth (1971-2024) is 171%, while Bihar’s is 233%, risking a loss of representation despite better demographic management.
• Penalizing Development: States with better health, education, and population control policies might be disadvantaged, discouraging progressive governance.
  For example: Kerala and Karnataka, with low birth rates, could lose seats, despite high human development indices compared to states with high fertility rates.
• Shift in Political Power: Northern states with high population growth may dominate Parliament, altering national policy priorities and governance models.
  For example: Bihar and Uttar Pradesh’s seat share might increase, shifting focus toward issues affecting them, potentially marginalizing concerns of other states.
• Economic Contribution vs. Representation: Southern states contribute higher per capita revenue to the economy but might receive lesser political representation and lower fiscal devolution.
  For example: The five southern states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu collectively account for 30% of India’s GDP as of March 2024, yet could see a decline in parliamentary influence due to population-based seat allocation.
• Federal Imbalance: The weightage of votes in densely populated northern states might increase, weakening the voice of progressive southern states in federal decision-making.
  For instance: According to data, we will have a 0% increase in seats for Kerala, only 26% for Tamil Nadu, but a whopping 79% for both Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.

Positive Impact on Federalism and Equitable Political Representation

• Better Representation for Growing Populations: High-growth states will gain representation proportional to their demographic size, making democracy more reflective of actual numbers.
  For example: UP’s population exceeds 230 million, yet its seat share remains unchanged since 1976, warranting revision for true proportionality.
• More Legislators for Effective Governance: Increased Lok Sabha seats will ensure better representation for citizens, reducing constituency size and improving governance.
  For example: Expanding parliamentary seats from 543 to 800+ will allow MPs to cater effectively to voter needs.
• Correction of Historical Imbalance: Northern states have been underrepresented due to frozen seat allocations, making delimitation an opportunity to correct past discrepancies.
  For example: Bihar’s representation remains based on 1971 numbers, despite significant population growth.
• Strengthening Democratic Legitimacy: Adjusting constituencies based on updated Census data will enhance democratic fairness and avoid population discrepancies in electoral representation.
  For example: Jharkhand, carved out of Bihar in 2000, still follows old constituency patterns, reducing political clarity.
• Boosting Regional Development: More MPs from populous states will bring attention to developmental gaps, ensuring targeted policy interventions for backward regions.
  For example: A higher MP count for states like MP and Rajasthan may lead to better infrastructure planning and investment allocation.

Negative Impact on Federalism and Equitable Political Representation

• Reduced Influence of Progressive States: Southern states with efficient governance models may see their influence wane, reducing incentives for effective policy management.
  For example: Kerala’s literacy driven growth will not reflect in seat allocation, weakening incentives for others to follow similar policies.
• Risk of Majoritarianism: Higher representation for populous states may encourage centralized policymaking, limiting regional autonomy in governance.
  For example: Legislative changes favoring agrarian states may overlook industrialized states’ concerns, affecting economic balance.
• Erosion of Fiscal Federalism:This political shift may influence the Finance Commission’s tax distribution, potentially benefiting states with higher representation. Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, despite their strong economic contributions, could face challenges in securing fiscal interests due to reduced representation.
• Potential for Political Polarization: Increased representation based purely on population may widen the North-South divide, creating regional tensions.
  For example: Tamil Nadu’s parties oppose delimitation, fearing loss of influence to Hindi-majority states, intensifying political fragmentation.

Way Ahead

• Weighted Representation Model: Maintain current seat proportions while allocating additional seats to populous states to balance representation.
  For example: A hybrid model like Rajya Sabha’s representation can ensure fairness without penalizing progressive states.
• Decoupling Seats from Population Growth: Consider economic contribution, development indices, and governance efficiency while reallocating seats.
  For example: States meeting sustainable development goals (SDGs) could receive reserved political representation, ensuring governance rewards.
• Constitutional Safeguards for Equitable Power Distribution: Implement legal provisions ensuring regional balance, preventing dominance by high-growth states.
  For example: A regional council within Parliament could advocate for underrepresented states’ interests.
• Gradual Implementation with Consensus: Adopt a phased approach post-2031 Census, allowing for stakeholder discussions and smooth adaptation.
  For example: Delimitation should be preceded by a national commission report, evaluating impact and recommending safeguards.
• Strengthening Federal Dialogue: Ensure state governments have an active role in delimitation discussions through institutionalized mechanisms.
  For example: Inter-State Council consultations should be mandatory before finalizing seat reallocations, promoting cooperative federalism.

A balanced delimitation can be the bridge between demographic reality and federal integrity. To prevent regional imbalances, innovative solutions like a dual representation model, weighted voting, or increased Rajya Sabha powers must be explored. Strengthening fiscal federalism and institutional mechanisms will ensure that political equity complements demographic shifts, fostering a harmonious and united India.

DOWNLOAD PDF