Answer:

State Election Commissions (SECs) in India, established under the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, are responsible for conducting elections to panchayats and urban local bodies. However, many SECs face disempowerment due to inadequate authority and resources, impacting their ability to conduct free and fair elections. Currently, only 11 out of 34 states and UTs have empowered SECs for ward delimitation.

The Disempowerment of State Election Commissions Poses a Threat to Grassroots Democracy:

• Erosion of Local Autonomy: The weakening of SECs undermines local self-governance by delaying elections and diminishing the autonomy of local bodies, which hampers grassroots democracy.
  For example: CAG’s performance audits found that 70% of urban local governments in 18 states lacked elected councils due to delays, highlighting SECs’ disempowerment.
• Undermining Public Trust: Frequent delays in local elections due to SECs’ lack of power erode public confidence in electoral processes, weakening democratic engagement at the grassroots level.
• Inadequate Resources and Authority: Many SECs lack the necessary resources and independent authority to conduct elections, often depending on state governments, which can lead to manipulation and biased outcomes.
• Politicisation of Local Elections: State control over SECs often results in the politicisation of local elections, where ruling parties manipulate the process to their advantage, undermining the democratic principle of fair representation.
• Weakening Electoral Accountability: Disempowered SECs reduce electoral accountability, as delayed or manipulated elections prevent the timely expression of public opinion and hold local governments accountable.
  For instance: Failure to conduct timely elections due to SEC disempowerment has led to prolonged vacancies in local councils, affecting governance and accountability.

Challenges Faced by State Election Commissions:

• Legal and Administrative Hurdles: SECs often face legal battles with state governments, hindering their ability to conduct elections independently and timely.
• Dependence on State Governments: Many SECs rely on state governments for resources, staffing, and logistical support, limiting their autonomy and effectiveness.
  For instance: Only 35% of India’s population is under SECs with full delimitation powers, reflecting the extensive dependency on state machinery.
• Lack of Financial Independence: SECs often do not have a dedicated budget and must rely on state allocations, which can be inconsistent and politically influenced.
  For instance: SECs are legally entitled to request funds but often do not receive adequate resources, affecting their ability to conduct effective elections.
• Insufficient Technological Support: SECs lack access to modern technology and data management systems needed for efficient electoral rolls and delimitation, leading to errors and delays.
• Interference in Electoral Processes: State governments often interfere in SEC functions, such as delimitation and electoral roll management, compromising the impartiality of local elections.

Measures to Strengthen SECs for Free and Fair Local Body Elections:

• Constitutional Amendments for Greater Autonomy: Amend the Constitution to grant SECs powers similar to the Election Commission of India, ensuring their independence and authority in electoral matters.
  For instance: Amendments could provide SECs with financial autonomy and control over electoral rolls, reducing dependence on state governments.
• Establishing a Collegium for Appointments: Implement a collegium system for appointing State Election Commissioners to ensure transparency and independence in SEC leadership.
• Regularized Delimitation and Reservation: Mandating regular intervals for delimitation and reservation of seats to prevent arbitrary delays and political manipulation by state governments.
  For instance: Conducting delimitation every 10 years would standardise the process and reduce state government interference.
• Enhancing Coordination with ECI: Fostering stronger institutional coordination between the SECs and the ECI for sharing resources, technology, and best practices to improve efficiency.
• Implementing Strict Accountability Measures: Introduce mechanisms for holding SECs and state governments accountable for delays and malpractices in local elections.
  For instance: A system of performance audits and penalties for undue delays and manipulation could ensure greater accountability and fairness.

To safeguard grassroots democracy, India must empower its State Election Commissions (SECs) to function independently and efficiently. Strengthening SECs with constitutional protections, transparent appointments, and better coordination with the ECI will ensure free and fair local body elections. This will enhance public trust in local governance, thereby reinforcing the foundation of democracy at the grassroots level.

DOWNLOAD PDF